|

Activists blockade genetically
engineered feed processing plant
Auckland, New Zealand, Dec. 21-- Today
police arrested four Greenpeace activists who stopped the production
and distribution of genetically engineered (GE) animal feed
by Tegel Foods Limited, the country’s largest supplier of chicken
feed.
Eighteen activists, ten of whom were dressed as
chickens, entered Tegels feedmill in Takanini, South Auckland
at 6:30am this morning.
Two “chickens” chained themselves to an immobilized
trailer carrying a billboard that blocked the entrance to the
factory. The trailer caused considerable delay in the operations
of the Tegel feedmill. The billboard read, “Tegel don’t be chicken,
say no to GE.” Two other activists locked onto equipment to
disrupt the production of the animal feed and they were also
arrested.
The activists involved in the protest included
international crew members from the Greenpeace flagship, Rainbow
Warrior II, which arrived in Auckland on December 20.
The action today followed Greenpeace’s discovery
that Tegel uses GE-contaminated soya meal in its animal feed.
Greenpeace condemned Tegel for using GE soya meal
in animal feed and met with Tegel officials on-site, asking
them to source GE-free soya meal.
“Tegel can easily follow the commitments that
have been made around Europe and agree to using only GE-free
soy in animal feed,” said Sarah Duthie, Greenpeace campaigner.
“GE-free soy is already available from Brazil, a country that
bans the growing of GE crops. Greenpeace is calling on Tegel
to make a commitment today to source GE-free soy,” said Duthie.
When the activists entered the mill they labeled
animal feed bags with, “Genetic Experiment, Warning: Contains
Genetically Engineered Soy.” Climbers hung a banner off a mill
silo reading, “Tegel Chicken Feed Not Wanted.”
“Tegel Foods Limited uses genetically engineered
soya meal grown in the United States. The soya meal is used
in animal feed which is supplied to Tegel poultry farmers,”
said Duthie.
“Greenpeace opposes the irreversible release of
genetically engineered organisms into the environment. As long
as companies like Tegel continue to use GE ingredients in their
animal feed the environment is exposed to the risks associated
with GE organisms,” said Duthie.
Source: Global @ction
globalaction@angelfire.com
Activists demand probe into
federal aid to nuclear industry
By Danielle Knight
Washington, Dec. 19 (IPS)-- Anti-nuclear
watchdogs and lawmakers here are calling for a federal investigation
into an alleged attempt by the government to help the nuclear
industry win approval for a controversial nuclear waste storage
site in Nevada.
Environmentalists and lawmakers in Nevada have
long argued against using Yucca Mountain in the deserts of southern
Nevada as a permanent repository for 70,000 metric tons of high-level
radioactive waste from nuclear reactors and weapons facilities
across the country.
A newly leaked document from the Department of
Energy has given opponents of the site new ammunition.
While legislation to store the waste in Yucca
Mountain has been stalled in Congress, the Department of Energy
(DOE) has been studying the site and has been compiling an independent
report.
But according to opponents of the project, a
leaked memo proves that the agency is biased in favor of the
nuclear industry that wants the site approved.
The memo, given to reporters, states that the
document “provides information that potential supporters can
use in expressing support for a site recommendation.”
“This outrageous memo demonstrates that the DOE’s
‘impartiality’ in assessing Yucca Mountain’s suitability for
a high-level radioactive waste dump is a joke,’’ said Wenonah
Hauter, director of Public Citizen’s Critical Mass Energy and
Environment Program.
Nevada senators Harry Reid and Richard Bryan,
and representatives James Gibbons and Shelley Berkley, are joining
advocacy groups in calling for the US General Accounting Office
to investigate if the DOE and its contractors are secretly lobbying
for the nuclear industry.
“It is imperative that science precedes politics
and that the Department of Energy maintains the highest degree
of integrity while conducting its evaluation process,’’ says
Senator Reid.
On December 8, Senator Reid asked the DOE’s Inspector
General to investigate the allegations of the DOE’s bias. On
December 12, Energy Secretary Bill Richardson requested an investigation
and said the report on Yucca Mountain would not be released
until the investigation is complete.
But activists are pushing for the General Accounting
Office, as an outside investigator, to look into the matter
since the Yucca Mountain proposal represents an enormous subsidy
for the nuclear industry, according to Michael Mariotte, executive
director of the Nuclear Information and Resource Service, an
advocacy group.
Storing the waste at Yucca Mountain is expected
to cost the federal government about 50 billion dollars.
“Instead the money should be used for further
investigations of what we should do with the waste,’’ says Mariotte.
Environmentalists across the nation are opposed
to moving the waste from commercial reactors, which are concentrated
in the eastern United States, to Nevada.
Dubbed “mobile Chernobyl’’ by activists, the transportation
scheme would involve highly radioactive shipments passing through
43 states to get to the far western state.
According to opponents of the Yucca Mountain site,
the plan not only poses dangers to those along the transportation
route, but several scientists say the waste could likely contaminate
the groundwater sometime in the future since the waste will
remain dangerously radioactive for about 240,000 years.
Critics also warn that the waste could be released
during an earthquake since Nevada ranks third in the nation
for current seismic activity.
Several indigenous rights organizations have also
joined environmentalists in opposing the site because Yucca
Mountain is considered sacred by the Western Shoshone Native
American tribe.
While environmentalists differ on what should
be done with the waste, Mariotte says that it should remain
stored at the reactor sites until the highly radioactive waste
decays or until a site proven to be permanently safe is found.
A letter sent Tuesday by about 160 environmental
organizations to the DOE urged Secretary Richardson to disqualify
the Yucca Mountain site based on its unsuitability.
Since 1954, when the Atomic Energy Act allowed
commercial nuclear reactors to generate electricity and held
the federal government responsible for the spent nuclear fuel,
scientists have been looking for a place to bury the waste.
In 1982, the Nuclear Waste Policy Act required
that two sites be selected. But five years later, Congress told
the Energy Department to study only Yucca Mountain. While the
legislation to approve the Yucca Mountain site has stalled in
Congress, lawmakers remain under pressure by the nuclear industry
to give the project the green light.
Senator Reid worries that the political battle
to keep nuclear waste out of Yucca Mountain will become harder
if President-elect George W. Bush appoints Senator Bennet Johnson
of Louisiana to the post of Energy Secretary.
Johnson, who while in the Senate had introduced
legislation to store waste in Yucca Mountain, is one of three
people Bush is currently considering for the cabinet position.
“Appointment of Bennet Johnson would be tantamount
to a declaration of war against the environmental movement,’’
said Mariotte.
|