|

Greenpeace invades US embassy
in Star Wars protest for Bush-Putin summit
Ljubljana, Slovenia, June 16-- Greenpeace
activists invaded the US embassy in Ljubljana, Slovenia, in
protest against the US push to deploy a Star Wars missile system,
as US President George Bush arrived for his first summit meeting
with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
A group of five activists climbed over the 3 metre
high fence and attempted to replace the US flag with a banner
saying “Stop Star Wars.” Another 20 activists also unfurled
banners saying “Stop Star Wars” in front of the embassy and
seven of this group locked on to the gates of the embassy. The
activists came from Austria, the United Kingdom and Slovakia.
“Today’s summit will be an historic disaster for
world peace if there is any deal struck between the US and Russia
on Star Wars,” said Greenpeace disarmament campaigner William
Peden. “Rather than enter a new era of conflict they should
be building upon the work of previous Russian and American Presidents
such as Bush senior, Clinton, Gorbachev and Yeltsin, who gave
the world historic agreements that deeply reduced their nuclear
arsenals. The legacy of Bush and Putin could well be a return
to the Cold War and a new nuclear arms race, if they reach agreement
on Star Wars.”
“President Putin must continue to reject Star
Wars and US demands to amend or destroy the 1972 Anti-Ballistic
Missile (ABM) Treaty which outlaws Star Wars. Putin has previously
described Star Wars as a ‘cure that is worse than the disease,’”
said Peden.
Under the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty,
the US and Russia are restricted to protecting only one site
each from missile attack rather than their entire territory,
as envisaged by Star Wars.
“If Bush continues to peddle dangerous myths
to justify Star Wars, he will leave Europe in no doubt that
American weapons manufacturers are driving US defense and foreign
policy and not the desire for global security and stability.
Bush will leave Europe branded as a dangerous arms salesman
and not an international statesman,” said Peden.
Source: Greenpeace: www.greenpeace.org
Brazilian farmers’ leader found
murdered
Sao Paulo, Brazil, June 16-- The bullet-riddled
body of a regional leader of Brazil’s landless farmers’ movement
was found Saturday on a roadside near the Paraguayan border,
police said.
The body of Valdecir Padilha, 31, was found in
the municipality of Itaquirai with three gunshot wounds to the
chest and one in the neck, news agency Agencia Estado reported.
Police in nearby Navirai, 540 miles west of Sao
Paulo, said they were investigating Padilha’s death.
Padilha was doing community service at Itaquirai
hospital as a sentence for leading several invasions of large
farms and ranches in the area for the Landless Farmworkers Movement.
Police said they found motorcycle tire marks and
parts of a car headlight and rear-view mirror at the site.
The landless movement spearheads large-scale occupations
of land it considers unproductive in order to pressure the government
into speeding up its agrarian reform program.
In recent years, the movement has also taken
to invading banks and other public institutions to press its
demands, which include the settlement of some 4 million landless
families it claims to represent.
In Brazil, the richest 20 percent of the population
owns about 90 percent the land, while the poorest 40 percent
holds just 1 percent.
More than 1,000 Brazilians have lost their lives
in land disputes over the past decade, according to Land Pastoral,
a Roman Catholic group that advocates land reform.
Source: Associated Press
Mexican government blocks bid
to patent maize
By Diego Cevallos
Mexico City, Mexico, June 14 (IPS)— The
Mexican government has stepped in to halt a patent for the maize
variety known as Optium, produced by the agricultural bio-tech
transnational Dupont, arguing that the grain originated in this
Latin American country and cannot be claimed as property.
Dupont is seeking rights over a maize variety
that it developed through crossbreeding, a traditional crop
improvement method.
The patent was to take effect June 1 in Europe,
but at the last moment, the Mexican government filed an appeal
of nonconformity with the European Patent Office (EPO), launching
a discussion and deliberation process.
The Dupont maize known as Optium HOC/HO possesses
traits that are similar to several Mexican varieties. Recognition
of the patent of these traits could harm local farmers because
it would give the transnational exclusive rights over a type
of grain derived from older and widely cultivated varieties,
say experts.
Dupont has responded to these claims saying that
its maize, which has a minimum content of six percent oil and
55 percent oleic acid, does not exist in Mexico or in any other
country. The transnational further asserted that its product
was developed by crossing corn varieties that are unknown in
Mexico.
“There are no scientific reports indicating that
Mexico has a type of maize with the exact traits of the Dupont
variety, but we are the country of origin of this plant species
and -- sooner or later -- the plant breeders here will obtain
a similar variety,’’ said Víctor Villalobos, Mexico’s assistant
secretary of Agriculture.
The case has not yet been won but the government
move at least halted the “rapacity’’ of the transnational, said
Liza Covantes, a spokeswoman for the environmental watchdog
Greenpeace in Mexico.
If the Mexican government had not taken action
before the June 1 deadline, when the EPO closed the period for
accepting objections, the Dupont patent would have entered into
full force.
Greenpeace, which sounded the alarm on the maize
patent case, presented its own claim of nonconformity before
the EPO.
The government, however, is still not assured
of obtaining the annulment of the patent, which would be valid
only in Spain, France and Italy, countries that do not buy Mexico’s
corn exports.
The authorities recognize that exact copies of
the Optium variety do not exist in Mexico, explained Villalobos.
The maize dispute is a typical case of “bio-piracy,’’
maintains the non-governmental Rural Advancement Foundation
International (RAFI).
Bio-piracy is a term environmental groups use
to describe the practice of companies from the industrialized
North of registering as their own intellectual property the
ancestral knowledge of plants and other organisms held by communities
in the developing South.
Ecologists and Mexican authorities alike believe
that the patent the US-based transnational is seeking must not
be granted because the Optium maize is too similar to locally
cultivated varieties. Dupont insists that its maize is unique.
If Dupont is able to declare property rights
over Optium, Mexican maize with similar traits would be impossible
to market, at least in Europe, and its producers would have
to pay royalties to the transnational, Covantes explained.
But the government does not see it that way. The
Dupont patent would not hurt Mexico because it is valid only
in countries that do not buy Mexican maize, according to Mexico’s
secretariat.
Maize originated in the region that is now Mexico.
Thousands of years ago the local population began to cultivate
the plant, giving rise to an entire world-view and mythology
that continues to permeate Mexican culture today.
The Dupont Optium dispute is not the first time
this country has been caught up in a bio-piracy case.
Under Mexico’s previous governments, there was
no internal coordination for handling these problems, which
could soon involve requests to patent transgenic organisms (genetically
modified plants or animals), pointed out Villalobos.
The Agriculture official announced that the government
will create a special committee — possibly by the end of September
— to study the bio-piracy matter in general, and whether the
government should pursue efforts to block patents involving
living organisms.
“We must watch over the rights of the farmer,
the peasant, the Indian, because they are the ones who have
selected the breeds and varieties that have become the crops
we know today, but that now -- with additional modification
(through genetic manipulation) -- take on greater value’’ and
can be patented, he said.
According to RAFI, the case involving Mexican
maize demonstrates that international laws for regulating patents
on living organisms are precarious or non-existent, and are
an indication of just how vulnerable developing countries are
to bio-piracy.
US picks Ecuador for drug
war base
By Anthony Boadle
Washington, DC— The United States will
expand its military presence in South America this fall when
a major anti-drug airborne surveillance facility begins operating
at the coastal airport of Manta, Ecuador, US officials said.
The buildup will be the first in Latin America
since US military bases closed in Panama in 1999 and will intensify
American operations in the war against the drug trade centered
in Colombia, the world’s largest cocaine producer.
Arms control advocates said in interviews yesterday
that Ecuador would become a new Honduras, the hub of US military
operations during the Central American wars of the 1980s. The
think tank RAND last week recommended a multinational effort
to contain Colombia’s civil war.
When the runway is lengthened by the end of September
at the Ecuadorian Air Force base, two large Airborne Warning
and Control System (AWACS) planes and two KC-135 refueling aircraft
will be able to land there simultaneously if need be.
The US Southern Command, located in Miami, which
controls US military operations in Latin America, said it would
also deploy one or two Navy P-3 aircraft, like the one captured
by China, plus two US Coast Guard P-3s and two C-130 transport
planes.
The apron will be able to accommodate three ARL
airborne reconnaissance aircraft developed by the US Army to
carry out low-profile intelligence work by day or night.
A Southcom spokeswoman said the AWACS would not
be assigned permanently to the Andean region, but would fly
out of US home bases and not use Manta at the same time.
But the maintenance and flying of the planes
will mean a significant increase in US military personnel in
Manta to a maximum of 400 stipulated in a November 1999 agreement
with Ecuador allowing use of the base for 10 years.
State Department officials said the aircraft would
be used exclusively for aerial detection, monitoring and tracking
of drug traffickers in the Andean region and the eastern Pacific.
They said they could not estimate the number of
US military personnel who would be in Manta at any given time,
because it would fluctuate according to mission requirements.
But they assured that the US presence would remain under the
agreed ceiling of 400 people.
Washington is spending $30 million to renovate
and lengthen the runway and $18.4 million on hangars, housing,
maintenance facilities and an operations building, contractors
said.
The surveillance base in Ecuador follows an increased
role in Colombia, where the US government is funding and training
a military-police offensive against drug plantations protected
by armed Marxist and right-wing groups in southern Colombia.
The operations are the largest by US military
in Latin America since the 1980s in Central America, with the
exceptions of the 1989 Panama invasion to oust dictator Manuel
Noriega for his ties to drug traffickers and the 1994 task force
to restore Haiti’s deposed president Jean-Bertrand Aristide.
Source: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
US agency to probe use of F-16s
against Palestinians
By Natan Guttman
Washington, DC— The US General Accounting
Office (GAO) has began an investigation into the American military
aid programs to the Middle East, following a complaint filed
by a Congressman regarding the Israeli use of F-16 fighters
against Palestinian targets.
A spokesman for the GAO, a Congressional agency,
confirmed last night that an investigation was indeed underway
and that it was still in the early stages.
The investigation began following a request by
Representative John Conyers Jr., Democrat from Michigan, and
the results of the probe will be presented to him when it is
completed. The findings will also be made public by the GAO.
In a letter to President Bush last week, Conyers
informed him of his request for an investigation, stressing
the fact that he considers it paramount that all sides in the
Middle East comply with the rules regulating the use of American-made
weapons sold in the region.
According to the terms of the sale of the F-16
fighters to Israel, the US limits their use for the purpose
of “legitimate defense.”
Congressman Conyers argues that the bombing of
Palestinian targets in Ramallah on May 18, which the Israel
Air Force carried out with F-16s, diverged from the terms under
which the aircraft were sold.
The GAO fulfills a dual function for Congress:
It provides Members of Congress with data in order to assist
them in their legislative tasks and also carries out investigations,
at the request of Members of Congress, into the functioning
of the government and its agencies.
In practice, the GAO operates much like the State
Comptroller’s Office in Israel, and the person in charge is
indeed called the Comptroller General.
The decision to embark on an investigation followed
an initial examination showing that no other government agency
had carried out a similar probe, and that it was within the
jurisdiction of the GAO to carry out such an assignment.
The Israeli Embassy spokesman in Washington,
Mark Regev, said in response to the announcement of the probe
that the Israeli attack came in response to Palestinian violence,
and that it was a clear act of self-defense.
Neither the State Department nor the US administration
condemned Israel for the use of the fighter aircraft against
targets in the territories.
Two weeks ago, Secretary of State Colin Powell
emphasized the fact that since the May 18 attack, Israel has
refrained from using F-16s against Palestinian targets.
Source: Al Awda News: Al-Awda-News@yahoogroups.com
|