No. 203, Dec. 5-11, 2002

FRONT PAGE
FROM THE EDITORS
COMMENTARY

LETTERS
LOCAL & REGIONAL
NATIONAL
WORLD
LABOR
ENVIRONMENT

CULTURE
MEDIA WATCH
NOTICIAS EN ESPAÑOL
AGR RESOURCE GUIDE


About AGR
Subscribe
Contact

Alternative Media Links



Bush rewrites national forest management law

A clearcut in the Sequoia National Forest.

By J.R. Pegg

Washington, DC, Nov. 27 (ENS)— The Bush administration has proposed broad changes to the federal government’s management plans for US national forests and grasslands.

The new rules would give increased authority to federal supervisors of each of the country’s 155 national forests to approve logging, drilling, and mining regardless of the forest plan’s guidelines for protecting wildlife.

The proposal also calls for the removal of a provision that requires the US Forest Service to scientifically monitor the effect of these activities on plant and wildlife species.

Critics contend the administration’s plan will eliminate or seriously weaken vital safeguards for all US national forests and grasslands, and will cause increased logging, drilling, and mining that will destroy habitat for many species of wildlife.

for the remainder of this article, go to:

ens-news.com

 

Bush appoints
controversial statesman
to head 9/11 investigation

Compiled by Eamon Martin

Dec. 4 (AGR)— Despite initial objections, on Wednesday, Nov. 27, President George W. Bush appointed controversial veteran US diplomat Henry Kissinger to head a new independent commission to investigate the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington.

On Wed., Nov. 27, President Bush appointed Henry Kissinger to head a new independent commission to investigate the Sept. 11 attacks on New York and Washington.

The Bush administration had long opposed the commission, arguing that a congressional investigation was better equipped to preserve national security secrets. Even after it accepted the idea in September, it argued with lawmakers over the panel’s composition. Bush backed down only after the families of the victims applied pressure and congressional hearings began to uncover intelligence and law enforcement failures.

Kissinger, 79, is one of the best-known and most controversial figures in 20th-century diplomacy. He was both Secretary of State and National Security Adviser to Republican presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. He won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973 with North Vietnam’s Le Duc Tho for ceasefire negotiations during the Vietnam War.

But in all those years of public service, Kissinger was famous for secrets. He was the architect of secret diplomacy with China, secret peace talks with Vietnam, a secret bombing of Laos, and a secret war involving 3,630 American bombing raids over the nation of Cambodia. Kissinger’s biographers have dubbed him a genius of secrets -- a man who played in-house politics better than any other official of his time. His control over the information of state reached the level of obsession. Leaks were cause for investigation -- unless they were leaks made by himself. He was said to be a true artist of the media leak. He has fought battles in and out of office to keep the public from knowing things. Not surprisingly, the appointment surprised and shocked numerous political observers.

“I honestly don’t think he has a stellar track record for this [assignment],” said Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, an organization that sued Kissinger over access to his official papers and lost in the US Supreme Court. After leaving public office, Kissinger had appropriated the records of his time at the State Department and took them on a truck to the Rockefeller family estate in New York.

”One would hope the American public will learn what went wrong on Sept. 11,” she said. “My concern is his propensity for secrecy, which unfortunately fits too well the pattern of the current White House.”

In Kissinger, Bush has appointed a man who understands the prerogatives of power, and who would seem to believe in strict limits on the public’s right to know what powerful people do or don’t do behind closed doors.

In his memoirs, Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, former commander of naval forces in Vietnam, wrote of his frustration with the efforts of Kissinger and Nixon “to conceal, sometimes by simple silence, more often by articulate deceit, their real policies about the most critical matters of national security.”

The man who once confided, “The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer,” is regarded by many outside the US as a war criminal. There are countries he can’t travel to for fear of arrest.

Vietnam

Kissinger participated in a GOP plot to undermine the 1968 Paris peace talks in order to assist Richard Nixon’s presidential campaign. As co-architect of Nixon’s war in Vietnam, Kissinger oversaw the secret bombing campaign which reached into neighboring Cambodia, an arguably illegal operation estimated to have claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of civilians. During the first 30 months of the Nixon-Kissinger administration, the US counter-insurgency “Phoenix Program” was responsible for the murder or abduction of 35,708 Vietnamese civilians. According to the US Senate sub-committee on refugees, from March 1969 to March 1972, in excess of three million civilians were killed, wounded or made homeless. Also during this period, the US launched approximately 4.5 million tons of high explosives on Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, which was 200% more than all of the bombs used during the entire period of World War II. The peace settlement that Kissinger negotiated in 1973 approximated what the Johnson Administration could have gotten four years earlier if Nixon and Kissinger hadn’t sabotaged the effort.

Bangladesh

In 1971, Pakistani General Yahya Khan, armed with US weaponry, overthrew a democratically elected government in an action that led to a massive civilian bloodbath. Hundreds of thousands were killed. Kissinger blocked US condemnation of Khan. Instead, he noted Khan’s “delicacy and tact.”

East Timor

In 1975, President Gerald Ford and Kissinger, still serving as Secretary of State, offered advance approval of Indonesia’s brutal invasion of East Timor. One-third of the East Timorese population was exterminated during the subsequent 20-year occupation, but this had little impact on continuing US and western arms shipments to the regime in Jakarta. For years afterward, Kissinger denied the subject ever came up during the Dec. 6, 1975, meeting he and Ford held with General Suharto, Indonesia’s military ruler. But a classified US cable obtained by the National Security Archive shows otherwise. It notes that Suharto asked for “understanding if we deem it necessary to take rapid or drastic action” in East Timor. Ford said, “We will understand and will not press you on the issue. We understand the problem you have and the intentions you have.” The next day, Suharto struck East Timor. Kissinger is an outright liar on this subject.

Chile

Kissinger is the target of two lawsuits, and judges overseas have sought him for questioning in war-crimes-related legal actions. On Sept. 9, two days before the Sept. 11 attacks, the family of Chilean General Rene Schneider sued Kissinger. Schneider was shot on Oct. 22, 1970, by would-be coup-makers working with CIA operatives. These CIA assets were part of a secret plan authorized by Nixon—and supervised by Kissinger—to foment a coup before Salvador Allende, a socialist, could be inaugurated as president. Schneider, a constitutionalist who opposed a coup, died three days later. This secret CIA program in Chile—dubbed “Track Two”—gave $35,000 to Schneider’s assassins after the slaying. Every single document in the prosecution case is a US-government declassified paper.

Michael Tigar, an attorney for the Schneider family, said at the time the lawsuit was filed, “Our case shows, document by document, that [Kissinger] was involved in great detail in supporting the people who killed General Schneider, and then paid them off.”

“The United States did not want Allende to assume the presidency, and my father was the only political obstacle for a military coup,” said Schneider’s eldest son, also named Rene Schneider.

The family chose to sue after carefully reviewing the materials that became public in the past two years, Schneider said. A Senate committee in 1975 found evidence that US officials hoped to instigate a coup to stop Allende and did in fact provide arms and encouragement to those plotting the general’s kidnapping. According to the Schneider family, the materials show that the CIA continued to encourage a coup in the days leading to the kidnapping.

“Every single factual assertion in this complaint is based on a document that has been furnished by the US government,” said Tigar.

Allende remained in power until a 1973 military coup that was supported by the CIA. Gen. Augusto Pinochet then began a 17-year reign in which thousands of people were killed or tortured. Before the coup, Kissinger had remarked: “I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves.” On June 8, 1976, at the height of Pinochet’s repression, Kissinger had a meeting with the Chilean dictator and behind closed doors told him that “we are sympathetic to what you are trying to do here.”

Pinochet was arrested in London in 1998 and indicted in Chile last year. But an appellate court recently suspended the legal proceedings because of concerns about his mental fitness for trial.

But Kissinger has more trouble than lawsuits. The Chilean Supreme Court sent the State Department questions for Kissinger about the death of Charles Horman, an American journalist killed during the 1973 coup. (Horman’s murder was the subject of the 1982 film Missing.) A criminal judge in Chile has said he might include Kissinger in his investigation of Operation Condor, a now infamous secret project, in which the security services of Chile, Uruguay, Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay, and Argentina worked together to kidnap and murder political opponents. Judges in France, Spain and Chile have requested that Kissinger answer questions about the deaths of their citizens in Operation Condor, but Kissinger, so far, has not been cooperative.

On Memorial Day 2001, Kissinger was visited by the police in the Ritz Hotel in Paris and handed a warrant, issued by Judge Roger LeLoire, requesting his testimony in the matter of disappeared French citizens in Pinochet’s Chile.

Kissinger chose to leave town rather than appear at the Palais de Justice as requested.

In late 2001, the Brazilian government canceled an invitation for Kissinger to speak in Sao Paulo because it could no longer guarantee his immunity. Earlier this year, a London court agreed to hear an application for Kissinger’s imprisonment on war crimes charges while he was briefly in the United Kingdom.

‘An investigatee, not an investigator’

“Dr. Kissinger will bring broad experience, clear thinking and careful judgment to this important task,” Bush said at the signing ceremony last week in the Roosevelt Room of the White House. “Secretary, thank you for returning to the service of your nation.”

The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States has a broad mandate, building on the limited joint inquiry conducted by the House and Senate intelligence committees. The independent panel will have 18 months to examine issues such as aviation security, diplomacy, terrorist financing and border problems, along with intelligence.

However, Bush did not set as a primary goal for the commission to uncover mistakes or lapses of the government that could have prevented the attacks. Instead, he said it should try to help the administration learn the tactics and motives of the enemy.

The commission’s creation is part of a bill authorizing intelligence activities in the 2003 budget year. Though most details of the legislation remain secret, lawmakers say it provides the biggest-ever increase in intelligence spending.

Ahead of the signing ceremony, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer made clear that Bush does not envision testifying before the panel.

The White House disclosed in May that Bush was told in the months before the Sept. 11 attacks that Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaida network might hijack US passenger planes, prompting the administration to issue an alert to federal agencies — but not the American public.

Several critics say Kissinger’s appointment would make a thorough investigation impossible. The Federation of American Scientists called it “an astonishing move that heralds stark limits on the scope of the investigation… He is an investigatee, not an investigator, and one who has stubbornly resisted the disclosure of official information to members of Congress, courts of law, private researchers, and others.”

In an editorial, the New York Times questioned Kissinger’s independence and suggested that the White House might have appointed him to contain the investigation rather than pursue it. The newspaper opined further that it would seem “improbable to expect Kissinger to report unflinchingly on the conduct of the government, including that of Bush. He would have to challenge the established order and risk sundering old friendships and business relationships.”

New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd mused, “Who better to ferret out government duplicity and manipulation than the man who engineered secret wars, secret bombings, secret wiretaps and secret coups, and still ended up as a Pillar of the Establishment and Nobel Peace Prize winner?”

Sources: BBC News, Boston Globe, CBSNews.com,
Financial Times (UK), Guardian (UK), The Nation, New York Times, Newsday, Pan-African News Wire, Reuters, Washington Post

 

 

 

 

Industrialized north hinders WTO medicine agreement

By Gustavo Capdevila

Geneva, Switzerland, Nov. 29 (IPS)— Negotiators at the World Trade Organization (WTO) failed Friday to reach an agreement to ensure poor countries access to essential medicines. Health activists blame the fiasco on opposition from the United States and a handful of other industrialized countries.

The WTO council on the Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (TRIPS), entrusted with the matter of pharmaceutical patents, ended its annual sessions this week without finding a solution that would guarantee developing countries access to generic medicines.

Mexican diplomat Eduardo Pérez Motta, chairman of the TRIPS negotiations, commented that the delegations representing the WTO member states “need time to take stock of the situation and to consult in capitals.”
As a result, the chances for an agreement facilitating poor nations’ access to medications depends on the WTO General Council, the institution’s maximum body when the ministerial conferences are not meeting. The Council is scheduled to meet Dec. 10-12 in Geneva.

In a declaration issued by the ministerial conference held last year in Doha, the Qatar capital, the WTO established health as a priority over trade and resolved that the mechanisms for exporting low-cost pharmaceuticals to poor countries should be resolved by the end of 2002.

Negotiations took place throughout the year to determine how countries of the developing South with their own pharmaceutical industries could supply other poor countries with the medications necessary to fight HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis and other epidemic diseases.

In early November, just when an agreement on the issue seemed imminent, hurdles emerged because the countries home to the big transnational drug companies — such as the United States and Switzerland — filed objections that went so far as to question the Doha Declaration’s take on trade and health.

Three non-governmental organizations, Oxfam International (based in Britain), Consumer Project on Technology (United States), and the Malaysia-based Third World Network are blaming industrialized countries for the failure of the talks.

The United States, Japan, Canada, European Union, and Switzerland demand that any solution to the problem of access to medications should be limited to those needed for only a few infectious diseases, complain the three NGOs.

Some of these wealthy countries also attempted to exclude from the agreement vaccinations, medical equipment, and even simple first-aid kits destined for poor countries that cannot manufacture these items themselves.

The three organizations charge that the position taken by the industrialized countries was “dictated by the ambitions of the big pharmaceutical companies.”

Another demand from the North seeks to divide the developing world into different categories for the application of the pharmaceutical access policies.

But Argentine negotiator Alfredo Chiaradia stressed that the Doha Declaration does not establish any sort of distinction between developing nations.

The African delegations to the WTO agreed that the negotiations had been “disappointing and frustrating,” and that it is unlikely that Africa will be able to resolve its severe public health problems, particularly HIV/AIDS, through this channel.

Africa’s stance has the backing of the rest of the developing world.

Brazil, which along with India pushed the issue of access to low-cost medication through the WTO ministerial conference in Doha, threw its support behind Africa.

Brazilian representative Antonio de Aguiar Patriota stressed that “at this moment Brazil is entirely behind the Africans,” adding that a period for reflection might be best given the current circumstances of the WTO talks.

Aguiar Patriota commented that the negotiations suffered a setback in recent weeks that had cast doubt over the Doha Declaration’s Paragraph 6, which consecrates that health comes before trade.

There are proposals on the table that would limit the diseases covered by the agreement and would introduce conditions for defining who the beneficiaries would be, said the Brazilian diplomat.

Such demands from the industrialized countries “hardly seem justifiable,” he said.

Oxfam International’s Celine Charveriat said her organization was “happy to see that developing countries have stood firm in the face of US attempts to rewrite the Doha Declaration.”

Despite the setbacks, she expressed hope that “we can still reach an effective solution before the end of the year so people have access to drugs and that their right to health is respected.”

Meanwhile, the US representative, Linnet F. Deily, asserted that her country is “committed to supporting poor countries in having access to drugs to fight epidemics.”

 

back to top

FRONT PAGE | FROM THE EDITORS | LETTERS | LOCAL & REGIONAL| NATIONAL | WORLD
COMMENTARY | CULTURE | MEDIA WATCH | ENVIRONMENT
LABOR | NOTICIAS EN ESPAÑOL | AGR RESOURCE GUIDE

about | subscribe | contact

Entire Contents Copyright 2002 Asheville Global Report.
Reprinting for non-profit purposes is permitted: Please credit the source.