Budget bill riders set
anti-environmental policies
go to story
ENVIRONMENT BRIEFS
go to briefs
Children face cancer risks from wood
playsets
By J.R. Pegg
Washington, DC, Feb. 12 (ENS) Government officials
warn that children face increased risks of developing lung or bladder
cancer if they use playground equipment made of wood treated with an arsenic-based
pesticide called chromated copper arsenate.
More than 90 percent of wood playground equipment and residential decks
now in use have been treated with chromated copper arsenate (CCA), which
protects wood from rotting due to insects and microbial agents.
In a statement released last Friday, Consumer Product Safety Commission
(CPSC) chair Hal Stratton said his agencys scientists recommend
that parents and caregivers thoroughly wash childrens hands with
soap and water immediately after youngsters play on playground equipment
made of the treated wood.
Children also should not eat while on the equipment, Stratton said.
This is the first official acknowledgment by the federal government that
there are health risks from structures built with the treated wood. Arsenic
bleeds to the surface of the wood and the residue is easily absorbed through
simple physical contact.
Young children are at particular risk because the residue sticks to their
hands and they are likely to ingest it by hand to mouth contact.
The study confirms what "weve been saying all along,"
said Richard Wiles, senior vice president of the Environmental Working
Group (EWG), which has petitioned to ban the use of CCA-treated wood in
playground equipment.
EWG and the Healthy Building Network filed a petition requesting the ban
in June 2001, and Wiles argues the government has been far too slow in
responding to growing evidence of the health risks posed to children by
the treated wood.
"You have to be in some fantasy land to think this doesnt cause
cancer in some kids," said Wiles.
The CPSC study found that two to 100 of every one million children frequently
exposed to CCA-treated wood risk developing lung or bladder cancer from
that exposure. The increased risk from CCA-treated wood is in addition
to other risks of developing cancer.
The wide range of risk comes from the difficulty in pinpointing the likelihood
that exposure to arsenic will cause cancer. CPSC researchers based their
conclusions on previous scientific studies of exposure to arsenic, which
is a known carcinogen. According to the National Academy of Sciences,
exposure to arsenic causes lung, bladder, and skin cancer in humans, and
is suspected as a cause of kidney, prostate, and nasal passage cancer.
In February 2002, the EPA forged an agreement with industry to halt the
use of CCA in new wood play sets and other consumer products by December
2003, but concluded that there was no reason to "remove or replace
arsenic treated structures."
But a study by EWG, released in August 2002, contradicted this finding.
EWGs report found that children who play on arsenic-treated play
sets and decks are at particularly high risk. The study analyzed the findings
of consumers across the country who tested some 263 decks, play sets,
and picnic tables, as well as the arsenic-contaminated soil beneath them.
According to EWG, the amount of arsenic wiped off a small area of wood
about the size of a four-year-olds handprint -- about 100 square
centimeters -- typically far exceeds what EPA allows in a glass of water
under the Safe Drinking Water Act standard.
The EPA is conducting a study of the risks that may be associated with
CCA-treated wood and expects to release the report later this year. In
addition, the EPA and CPSC staffs plan to conduct a study to determine
effective measures of reducing the amount of arsenic released from CCA-treated
wood.
Sealants, argues EWGs Wiles, are not a long-term solution and do
not get rid of the arsenic. While a full recall of all treated wood may
not be feasible the option should be explored for play sets, he added.
The EPA advises that individuals who decided to remove CCA-treated wood
play sets to contact the agency or a state or local solid waste management
office for disposal instructions. CCA-treated wood should never be burned
in open fires, the agency warns.
The CPSC will hold a public briefing on Mar. 12, 2003 to consider the
petition. CCA is a registered chemical pesticide that is subject to EPA
regulation, but the playground equipment made with CCA-treated wood is
the jurisdictional responsibility of the CPSC. Stratton recommended that
the agency wait on formal action until the EPA has finished its own studies.
This decision, said Paul Bogart, director of the Healthy Building Networks
arsenic-treated wood phase out campaign, is "irresponsible."
Even with this new study, added Wiles, the federal government has not
delivered "a coherent statement to the American public on this issue."
Bogart also criticized the limited scope of CPSCs study, which did
not look at decks or picnic tables.
"The fact that the CPSC has restricted their conclusions to arsenic
treated play sets doesnt make any sense," he said. "A
childs body doesnt differentiate between the arsenic they
get from their deck or their picnic table, and the arsenic from a playground."
Industry groups, including the American Wood Preservers Institute, believe
the CPSC erred in releasing its findings prior to the completion of these
other studies. The organization is unconvinced the wood treated with CCA
poses a serious health risk, even though the industry and EPA have agreed
to a ban.
CCA has been used to treat wood since the 1940s, although its use for
play sets and decks has largely been in the past two decades. On Friday,
an industry group, the Treated Wood Council, said it "stands by the
safety of CCA-treated wood, when handled properly."
"The Treated Wood Council believes that the Consumer Product Safety
Commissions (CPSC) release of a staff briefing on CCA treated wood
in playground equipment is premature and could cause needless confusion
among consumers and parents," the group said. "Given the numerous
CCA studies by government and industry now underway, including an Environmental
Protection Agency risk assessment expected later this year, the Treated
Wood Council questions CPSCs decision to release information before
the scientific findings from these additional studies are in."
But growing pressure on the regulation of wood preservatives is not limited
to CCA. In December 2002, a national labor union, environmental groups,
and a victim family filed suit in federal district court in Washington
DC to stop the continued use of CCA, as well as pentaclorophenol and creosote,
two other wood preservatives.
back to top
Budget bill riders set
anti-environmental policies
By J.R. Pegg
Washington, DC, Feb. 14 (ENS) Republicans slid a host of anti-environmental
riders into the final text of the $397.4 billion spending bill passed
by Congress yesterday. One rider blocks appeals against a pending decision
on whether to expand protection for Alaskas Tongass National Forest.
Others cut funding for land conservation, weaken the national organic
labeling standards, and expand a pilot forest thinning program that environmentalist
decry as a further subsidy for timber companies.
"Congress just bought smaller, more degraded forests and open spaces,"
said Bonnie Galvin, director of budget and appropriations for The Wilderness
Society, a national conservation organization based in Washington, DC.
The process to stuff the appropriations for all federal agencies except
the Defense Department into one bill was never expected to be pretty,
but even seasoned members of Congress are surprised by the end result.
Senator John McCain (R-AZ) blasted his colleagues for a 3,000 page document
that "no one in this body has had time to thoroughly review, examine,
and debate."
Members of Congress complained that they were forced to pass the massive
spending bill, because allowing the government to continue operating through
stopgap resolutions was a worse alternative. The bill will fund the government
for the remainder of fiscal 2003, which ends in September.
The House adopted the bill by a vote of 338 to 83, the Senate by a vote
of 76 to 20.
For the rest of this article, please see Environment
News Service.
back to top
|