|
Sick, wounded US troops held in squalor
Hundreds of sick and wounded US soldiers including many who served in
the Iraq war are languishing in hot cement barracks in Fort Steward, Georgia
while they wait sometimes for months to see doctors.
The National Guard and Army Reserve soldiers living conditions are
so substandard, and the medical care so poor, that many of them believe
the Army is trying to push them out with reduced benefits for their ailments.
One document shown to UPI states that no more doctor appointments are
available from Oct. 14 through Nov. 11 Veterans Day.
I have loved the Army. I have served the Army faithfully and I have
done everything the Army has asked me to do, said Sgt. 1st Class
Willie Buckels, a truck master with the 296th Transportation Company.
Buckels served in the Army Reserves for 27 years, including Operation
Iraqi Freedom and the first Gulf War. Now my whole idea about the
US Army has changed. I am treated like a third-class citizen.
One month after President Bush greeted soldiers at Fort Stewart
home of the famed Third Infantry Division as heroes on their return
from Iraq, approximately 600 sick or injured members of the Army Reserves
and National Guard are warehoused in rows of spare, steamy and dark cement
barracks in a sandy field, waiting for doctors to treat their wounds or
illnesses.
The Reserve and National Guard soldiers are on what the Army calls medical
hold, while the Army decides how sick or disabled they are and what
benefits if any they should get as a result.
Some of the soldiers said they have waited six hours a day for an appointment
without seeing a doctor. Others described waiting weeks or months without
getting a diagnosis or proper treatment.
The soldiers said professional active duty personnel are getting better
treatment while troops who serve in the National Guard or Army Reserve
are left to wallow in medical hold.
It is not an Army of One. It is the Army of two Army and
Reserves, said one soldier who served in Operation Iraqi Freedom,
during which she developed a serious heart condition and strange skin
ailment.
A half-dozen calls by UPI seeking comment from Fort Stewart public affairs
officials and US Forces Command in Atlanta were not returned.
Soldiers at Fort Stewart estimate that nearly 40 percent of the personnel
now in medical hold were deployed to Iraq. Of those who went, many described
clusters of strange ailments, like heart and lung problems, among previously
healthy troops. They said the Army has tried to refuse them benefits,
claiming the injuries and illnesses were due to a pre-existing condition,
prior to military service. (UPI)
Panel eyes homeland spy service
A former CIA director and a former deputy national security adviser on
Oct. 14 advocated major changes to the US intelligence establishment in
testimony before the independent commission studying the terror attacks
of Sept. 11, 2001.
John M. Deutch, CIA director from 1995-1996, and James B. Steinberg, deputy
national security adviser in the Clinton administration, endorsed two
structural reforms: appointing a director of national intelligence separate
from the CIA, and creating a domestic security service modeled after Britains
MI5.
In an interview on the eve of his testimony, Steinberg said US counterterror
efforts remain hampered by decades-old walls separating by law the work
of the FBI and CIA. The FBI operates domestically and traditionally focuses
on catching law-breakers; the CIA works abroad and focuses on learning
secrets.
The beauty of the MI5 model is it breaks down both those walls,
said Steinberg, director of foreign policy studies at the Brookings Institution.
MI5 describes itself as Britains defensive security intelligence
agency. It is the domestic partner to MI6, the foreign intelligence agency.
MI5 cannot detain or arrest its targets, but seeks to to gain the
advantage over (them) by covertly obtaining information about them
for countering their activities.
Besides the FBI and CIA, the US intelligence apparatus includes the National
Security Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Reconnaissance
Office, and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency. In addition, the
Air Force, Army, Navy and Marine Corps all have intelligence departments,
as do certain civilian agencies, like the Departments of Energy, Homeland
Security and State. (CBS)
God put Bush in charge, says general hunting bin Laden
The general leading the hunt for Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein has
publicly declared that the Christian God is bigger than Allah,
who is a false idol, and believes the war on terrorism is
a fight with Satan, it emerged this week.
Investigative reporters from the Los Angeles Times and NBC television
have dug up two years worth of seemingly incendiary comments from
Lt. Gen. William Jerry Boykin, the newly promoted deputy undersecretary
of state of defense for intelligence.
Gen. Boykin has repeatedly told Christian groups and prayer meetings that
President George W. Bush was chosen by God to lead the global fight against
Satan. He asked one gathering: Why is this man in the White House?
The majority of Americans did not vote for him. Hes in the White
House because God put him there for a time such as this.
In January, he told Baptists in Florida about a victory over a Muslim
warlord in Somalia, who had boasted that Allah would protect him from
American capture. I knew my God was bigger than his. I knew that
my God was a real god and his was an idol, Gen. Boykin said.
He also emerged from the conflict with a photograph of the Somalian capital
Mogadishu bearing a strange dark mark. He has said this showed the
principalities of darkness. . . a demonic presence in that city that God
revealed to me as the enemy.
On the Middle East, Gen. Boykin told an Oregon church in June that America
could not ignore its Judaeo-Christian roots. Our religion came from
Judaism and therefore [Islamic] radicals will hate us forever.
In the same month, Gen. Boykin told an Oklahoma congregation that Osama
bin Laden and Saddam Hussein were not the enemy.
Our enemy is a spiritual enemy because we are a nation of believers.
. . His name is Satan.
Gen. Boykin told NBC that he would be curtailing his speeches to religious
groups. I dont want to come across as a right-wing radical,
he said. (Daily Telegraph (UK))
Flaws discovered in ballot computers
Next years US presidential election may be compromised by new voting
machines that computer scientists believe are unreliable, poorly programed
and prone to tampering.
An investigation published in todays Independent reveals tens of
thousands of touch screen voting machines may be less reliable than the
old punchcards, which famously stalled the presidential election in Florida
in 2000, leaving the whole election open to international ridicule.
The machines are said to offer no independent verification of individual
voting choices, making recounts impossible, and the software is shielded
from public scrutiny by trade secrecy agreements.
The shortcomings have appeared in two academic studies and have prompted
calls for urgent oversight legislation. They have also cast doubt on the
accuracy of last Novembers mid-term election results, especially
in Georgia, the first state to switch to touch screen voting.
The three leading voting machine manufacturers are substantial Republican
campaign donors, and one of their chief executives, Walden ODell
of Diebold, in Ohio, wrote a letter to Republican supporters saying he
was committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the
President next year.
In Georgia, citizens were alarmed at apparent anomalies in the election
results for governor and one of the states two Senate seats. Both
offices were won by Republicans in last-minute voting swings away from
Democrats.
Causes for alarm included a serious malfunction in the voting software,
discovered after the machines were packaged for shipment, which had to
be repaired with a programming patch, and the fact that the
patch showed up on an open-access internet page. Hundreds of security
flaws were identified in subsequent follow-up studies. There were also
several election day glitches, including the loss of 67 voting memory
cards in the Democrat stronghold of central Atlanta. (Independent
UK)
Halliburton accused of overbilling US taxpayers
A Democratic lawmaker has accused Halliburton, the Texas oil services
company once run by Vice President Dick Cheney, of overcharging the government
for gasoline the firm imports into Iraq.
Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root has a contract with the
US Army Corps of Engineers to rebuild Iraqs oil sector, which has
included importing gasoline products in short supply to the oil-rich nation.
Waxman said army documents showed that as of Sept. 18, the United States
had paid Halliburton $300 million to import about 190 million gallons
of gasoline into Iraq.
Halliburton charged an average price of $1.59 per gallon, excluding the
companys fee of 2 percent to 7 percent, said Waxman.
He said the average wholesale cost of gasoline during that period in the
Middle East was about 71 cents a gallon, a figure an oil industry source
told Reuters was accurate. That meant Halliburton was charging more than
90 cents a gallon to transport fuel into Iraq from Kuwait.
When we checked with independent experts to see if this fee was
reasonable, they were stunned, said Waxman, adding a reasonable
transport cost would be 10 to 25 cents per gallon, especially as the US
military was providing security.
Waxman sent a letter on Wednesday to the White House Office of Management
and Budget complaining KBR was overcharging for petroleum products.
From the facts available to us, Halliburton seems to be inflating
gasoline prices at a great cost to American taxpayers. The overcharging
by Halliburton is so extreme that one expert privately called it highway
robbery, he wrote. (Reuters)
|