No. 253, Nov. 20-26, 2003

SECCIÓN EN ESPAÑOL

NATIONAL NEWS





To read an article, click on the headline.


Military families raise hell

 




Military families raise hell

By John Tarleton

Nov. 14— Debbie Roath’s husband Jeffrey was activated by the Army Reserves in January and was sent to the Middle East in April. While she has stayed home in Marshall, Missouri, to raise their five children, he has helped the 129th Transportation Company haul golf carts, motor boats and SUVs (as well as M1-70 Abrams tanks) across Iraq’s dangerous highways.

Roath, 40, who voted for Bush in 2000, is now one of the leaders in a highly vocal online campaign to bring her husband’s unit home.

“Our husbands’ and our soldiers’ lives are being put in danger,” she says. “And I don’t see any reason for that except greed.”

As the United States first long-term occupation of another country since Vietnam becomes bloodier and more chaotic, military family members like Roath are beginning to raise their voices in the belief that supporting the troops ultimately means ending the war.

“I think it has a tremendous impact in how the anti-war movement is received by public and Congress,” says Ben Chitty of Vietnam Veterans Against the War. “Family members and returning vets provide political credibility.”

“It [the military families movement] is relatively small right now,” adds Professor Robert Buzzanko, author of Masters of War: Military Dissent and Politics in the Vietnam Era. “But as more reserves get called in and more soldiers get killed, it can only grow. It’s serious.”

Buzzanko notes that President Lyndon Johnson repeatedly refused to call up the reserves at the height of the Vietnam War for fear of the social disruption it would cause. After Vietnam, the Pentagon set in place a political tripwire by reconfiguring its forces so that it would be impossible to carry out a military occupation without quickly resorting to large numbers of reserves to carry out day-to-day tasks —engineering, policing, medical support, transportation, public relations, and civil administration.

The Bush administration crossed that threshold in mid-September when it announced that 20,000 reserves currently stationed in Iraq and Kuwait would have their overseas deployment extended from six months to 12 and that their total mobilization could be extended to a full 24 months.

Members of Congress were besieged with complaints from across the country. 129bringthemhome.com’s online petition drive received 8,000 signatures overnight. The military brass openly speculated there would be a mass exodus of Guard and Reserve troops at the end of their current deployments.

“Extending arduous tours of duty in the middle of a deployment demonstrates not only poor planning, but a complete disregard for the families of service members who are already making tremendous personal and financial sacrifices,” a former Navy recruiter wrote on 129bringthemhome.com.

At home, Roath tried to explain the situation to her five children. “They cried and they were angry. They don’t understand why the military and our president lied to them.”

Other military family members are also raising their voices.

Fernando Suarez del Solar of Escondido, California, started Fundación Guerrero Azteca this spring after the Marines refused to pay the full burial costs for his son Jesús, who was killed by an unexploded cluster bomb one week into the war. Guerrero Azteca assists other Spanish-speaking families with burial costs and with psychological counseling. Suarez has since traveled to Baghdad and spoken before Congress as a passionate critic of the war.

“In war there are no winners, only victims,” he says. “They [the troops] are the first victims of this crime.”

Kimberly Huff, 32, is one of the leaders of the 437th Medical Company’s Family Readiness Group (FRG), which helps military families cope with the day-to-day stress of deployment. Military officials usually attend the FRG’s monthly get-togethers. They admonish family members not to talk about the war with the press lest they “compromise the mission.” “I think the first reaction of most people is to obey,” Huff says.

Huff’s response: she wears T-shirts that say, “My husband is a political prisoner in Bush’s army” and regularly speaks out at local anti-war rallies.

“I don’t want people to forget about our troops,” says Huff, who will mark her second wedding anniversary on Nov. 29. “They’re still over there. And they need to come home.”

Huff’s one-woman campaign extends to the freeways of Southern California where passing motorists can read the yellow chalk messages on all five windows of her Chevy Blazer.

“I get all sorts of honks and waves of approval as I drive the freeways,” Huff says. “I had one woman approach me in the parking lot the other day and say, ‘I thought the war was over but I guess I was wrong.’”

Adele Kubein, 50, writes letters constantly to local newspapers and to her elected representatives. Her daughter joined the Oregon National Guard five years ago. She already had wild-land firefighting experience and needed money to finish college. When Kubein asked her daughter if she was sure she wanted to join, she replied, “Oh, Mom, there’s never going to be another war.” Now she finds herself stationed in the northern city of Mosul where her unit comes under nightly mortar and sniper fire.

“A lot of those guys had never prepared for something like this,” Kubein notes. “They were supposed to build roads and fight fires in Oregon, not be killing kids or getting shot at all the time.”

Last November, Nancy Lessin and Charley Richardson started Military Families Speak Out (www.mfso.org) after their son was deployed to the Persian Gulf with the Marines. The Internet-based advocacy group’s list serve has since grown to more than a thousand members.

“We get so many emails from people who say ‘Thank God I found you because I thought I was the only person connected with the military who felt like this,” Richardson, 50, says.

Still, Richardson acknowledges dissent among military families remains the exception not the rule.

“It’s very hard to believe that your loved one is in harm’s way for no good reason,” Richardson says. “It’s easier psychologically to believe in the war.”



Source: NYCIndypendent, a publication of the New York Independent Media Center, http://nyc.indymedia.org