Bush admin. opens last North American
rainforest to logging
Compiled by Eamon Martin
Dec. 29 (AGR) Capping more than 10 years of intense
controversy over the fate of some of the nations last remaining
old-growth forest and igniting howls of protest from conservationists,
the Bush administration on Dec. 23 removed prohibitions on logging
and development from 9 million acres of the United States
largest national forest, the Tongass of southeastern Alaska.
The Bush administration rule, led by US Undersecretary of Agriculture
Mark Rey, a former timber lobbyist, announced the day before Christmas
Eve, exempts the Tongass National Forest from the Roadless Area
Conservation Rule. This landmark conservation policy was designed
to protect 58.5 million acres of pristine national forest land
from logging and roadbuilding. The new rule exempting the Tongass
is the result of a deal to end a court challenge to the roadless
rule brought by the State of Alaska.
The roadless rule was put in place after a two-year process that
included 600 scientific studies and two rounds of public comments
that generated almost two million responses, most of them in favor
of the rule.
The Tongass contains nearly 30 percent of the worlds unlogged
coastal temperate rainforest. At risk are the habitats of the
North American grizzly bear, bald eagle, coho salmon, humpback
whale, and Sitka black-tail deer, among others.
Widespread opposition to undoing the Tongass protections was expressed
this summer when the public sent more than a quarter of a million
comments in opposition to the proposal. These comments followed
more than two million comments supporting the roadless rule in
response to prior notices.
But Rey recently dismissed the public outcry as not a referendum
and the he would not count votes from the public.
The Bush administration has turned its back on the public,
good science, and the law in its effort to clear-cut the Tongass,
said Tom Waldo, an attorney for environmental watchdog group Earthjustice.
This is obviously a Christmas present from the Bush administration
to the timber industry which wants the right to clear-cut in Americas
greatest temperate rainforest.
Bush administration officials claimed the decision would result
in the logging of only about 3 percent of the forest.
But environmental groups countered that because the parcels to
be cut are spread across much of the landscape, roads built to
provide loggers with access will end up disturbing much more of
the temperate coastal rainforest four times as much, according
to US Forest Service estimates.
Dennis Neill, public affairs officer for the national forest said
plenty of intact forest will be left. About 6.7 million acres
of the 16.8 million-acre forest is permanently off-limits to all
development. The current forest plan envisions allowing logging
only about 676,000 acres, of which 330,000 acres are affected
by yesterdays decision.
This place is not going to be a 16 million-acre stump field.
Its not happening, he said. Yeah, were
going to cut some trees. Thats part of our job. Its
part of our mission. Congress passes the budget every year and
tells us to do that.
Environmentalists also attacked the decision for its timing.
We were anticipating this would come down right before Christmas
when the news would get less attention, said Nicole Whittington-Evans,
assistant regional director of The Wilderness Society. This
is just a clear pattern with the Bush administration where they
ignore public comment, both inside and outside Alaska, which favored
protection of the Tongass roadless areas, and just basically line
the pockets of corporate interests.
Administration officials also plan to remove the roadless-rule
protections at the nations second-largest national forest,
the Chugach, near Anchorage.
Environmental groups supported the roadless rule as a way to curb
the development and logging that had already affected half of
national forest land. But Western states and the timber industry
said the rule was unjustified in its sweeping scope touching
about 30 percent of national forest acreage in the country.
Industry groups and states have made a concerted effort to attack
the rule through lawsuits around the country. In July, a federal
district court judge in Wyoming suspended the rule nationwide.
Environmental groups are appealing the case to the United States
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, in Denver.
Before that, a federal court in Idaho originally threw out the
roadless rule, but that decision was overturned last December
by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in
San Francisco.
Rather than wait for a resolution, the administration has
indicated that it will move administratively to give individual
governors the right to ignore the rule. That would seem to pre-empt
the judicial process. It would also give a handful of state officials
power over federal lands, which belong to all Americans,
the New York Times responded in an editorial.
The Tongass National Forest has been particularly contentious
because it is the only temperate rainforest on the continent.
This is the rarest forest type on earth and it needs to
be protected, said Jeremy Paster, a forest campaign organizer
for Greenpeace.
Amy Mall of the Natural Resources Defense Council, said it would
open to development the most valuable habitat from one of
our most important forests and one of the most ancient forests
worldwide. The trees they want to log are the biggest and oldest.
Of the more than 250,000 comments the agency received, she said,
fewer than 2,000 favored the rule.
Sources: Earthjustice, New York Times,
Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Washington Post
Mad cow disease exposes meat industry
negligence
By Liz Allen
Dec. 31 (AGR) The United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) announced on Dec. 23 that the disease known as Bovine Spongiform
Encephalophy (BSE) or mad cow disease was found in a dairy cow
slaughtered in Mabton, Washington on Dec. 9.
USDA officials are currently claiming that the cow may have come
from Canada. BSE is contagious, fatal, and affects the central
nervous system. The disease can incubate for four or five years
before symptoms appear.
BSE is generally thought to be transmitted through the consumption
of prion proteins, agents that are modified forms of components
of normal cell surfaces. They are found in food containing meat
from infected animals. Cattle catch the disease because of the
common meat industry practice of putting animal parts into livestock
feed for extra protein.
There is a 1997 law in the US prohibiting cattle farmers from
feeding their animals feed that contains brain or spinal cord
tissue. According to the USDA the disease is contagious through
the consumption of brain, spine or lower intestine matter from
infected animals. Enforcement of the 1997 law is weak, causing
a higher risk for infection.
Humans who consume beef contaminated with BSE can catch a similar
disease, a variant of Creutzfeldt - Jakob Disease (vCJD). The
disease is fatal. Although some neurologic symptoms may appear,
brain abnormalities cannot be detected through an MRI or x-ray
until vCJD is already in its late stages. The USDA is maintaining
that US meat is still safe to consumers, and their recall of over
10,803 pounds of beef is acting in an abundance of precaution.
The USDA claims to have tested 20,000 cattle for Mad Cow Disease
in 2002 and 2003, however, according to United Press International
(UPI) news service, the USDA has not produced documents pertaining
to those tests, despite requests over a series of months since
July, 2003. UPI reported that USDA official Michael Marquis responded
to the initial request that same month, promising that if any
such documents exist, they would be forwarded.
However, UPI also reports that no phone calls, made periodically
since July through December, were returned. UPI called the USDAs
failure to produce documents a violation on a 30-day limit by
the Freedom of Information Act.
How long BSE has been in the US is a point of controversy. The
USDA reports that the only previous case was a young woman in
the US and she is believed to have contracted the disease while
previously living in the UK, where the largest outbreak of BSE
and vCJD occurred.
However, critics say that BSE has been in the US for many years,
and is a result of mistreatment of animals in the industry, inadequate
testing and lax industry oversight.
Wayne Pacelle, a senior vice-president of the United States Humane
Society, pointed to the slaughtering of downer animals
as a threat to the US meat industrys safety standards. Downer
animals are animals too sick to stand or walk and are usually
spent dairy cattle.
The infected cow was identified as a downer cow, but was originally
identified as having partial paralysis due to complications from
pregnancy, and although she was tested for BSE she was sent to
the slaughterhouse anyway.
He called these animals the prime carriers of BSE and referred
to a 2001 study in Germany that found the cows up to 240 times
more likely to be a carrier of BSE. Pacelle called for laws banning
the slaughtering of downer animals. He said such legislation was
passed last year by US House and Senate, but was killed in conference
after heavy lobbying by the dairy industry.
Also, in question is the testing technique for the disease, which
takes a longer time to process than the tests that are conducted
in Europe. Plus, the industry only tests a small percentage of
the 35 million cattle that are commercially slaughtered each year.
Retired USDA veterinarian Michael Schwochert reported to UPI that
in the last six months he had seen a cow who appeared to have
the BSE, who was sent out on a special truck before USDA officials
saw and the people working in the office at the meat processing
plant were told not to say anything about the incident.
Organic beef is increasingly seen as a safer option,
because the cattle receive more individualized attention, and
do not eat feed containing antibiotics, hormones or high-protein
animal waste and blood.
Also, organically raised cattle are rarely slaughtered when too
sick to walk. But organic cattle are not necessarily free from
mad cow disease because not all causes of the disease are known
and calves from a non-organic cow could have been exposed to the
disease.
The US beef industry accumulated $2.6 billion in overseas beef
sales with 80 percent being sold to Japan, South Korea and Mexico.
Already 11 countries have banned beef imported from the US.
On Dec. 29 the US entered into negotiations with Japan to attempt
to lift the ban on beef, although Japan refused. At least four
major grocery chains on the west coast in the US have voluntarily
removed US beef from their shelves. As of Dec. 26, McDonalds
is reported to have suffered a 5 percent slide in sales and the
US dollar is sliding to another low against the euro.
The USDA continues to insist that their beef supply is safe. US
Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman insisted that she would be serving
US beef at her holiday dinner. Previously the USDA and the FDA
placed limits importing products such as food, food ingredients,
dietary supplements and cosmetics from countries that had documented
cases of BSE.
Questions raised after shooting of
Israeli protester
Compiled by Joshua Ferguson
Dec. 29 (AGR) Israeli soldiers on Friday, December
26 shot and wounded an Israeli and an American who were among protesters
trying to breach a controversial barrier Israel is building in the
West Bank, witnesses said.
The protesters were demanding that the gate near the West Bank village
of Mascha be opened so farmers could tend their fields. When it was
not, they cut the fence with pliers, eventually creating a hole large
enough for a person to walk through, according to an Associated Press
photographer on the scene.
On the other side, about half a dozen Israeli soldiers, who appeared
panicked and unprepared, demanded they stop, fired several bullets
in the air and then shot at their legs
The army, confirming two people were wounded, said in a statement
that soldiers opened fire only after several protesters became violent
and tried to cut through the fence.
One of the wounded was 22-year-old Gil Naamati, an Israeli who had
just completed three years of military service as a combat soldier.
He was shot in both legs and was hospitalized soon after. The American
identified herself as Anne Farina, 26. She was only slightly wounded.
The two were part of a group of an estimated 500 foreign and Palestinian
protesters demonstrating against the building of an Israeli wall that
Israel claims will help prevent suicide bombers from crossing over
into Israeli territory. Opponents claim that the fence will encroach
upon Palestinian land, in some cases already dividing villages and
separating farmers from their fields.
Palestinian officials said the shooting supported their long-standing
contention that Israeli troops are too quick to use lethal force.
It shows how liberal the army is in using live ammunition against
peaceful demonstrators, said Dr. Mustafa Barghouti, who leads
a Palestinian group monitoring the violence.
In many previous shootings involving Palestinians, the Israeli military
has routinely said that soldiers followed strict rules of engagement
on the use of live ammunition. The military does not divulge the specific
rules, but in most instances, soldiers are to use other means, like
tear gas or rubber bullets, unless they believe they are in danger,
military officials say.
The protesters say they had no weapons and did not throw stones or
otherwise endanger the soldiers, who they said were 20 to 40 yards
away, on the far side of the fence. We didnt threaten
soldiers, Naamati said in the only interview he gave from his
hospital bed, to the army radio. All we hurt was the fence.
The fence does not threaten lives. We did not threaten anyones
life. . Naamati acknowledged he was among those shaking the
fence and trying to cut through it. But he added, I am familiar
with the rules of engagement, and what I did was not even close to
something that I think would warrant opening fire.
The army said it would investigate, but an Israeli military source
said the soldiers operated according to procedure after they told
protesters to move away from the fence and fired warning shots into
the air.
Anyone who attacks the security fence is considered suspicious,
and this behavior is a (legitimate) reason for soldiers to begin conducting
arrest procedures . . . It doesnt matter who the person is,
the source said.
Hard-line Cabinet minister Uzi Landau said the soldiers had to stop
the protesters, or it would have set a bad precedent and encouraged
others to break through the barrier. Anyone who destroys the
fence is assisting terrorism, he said.
According to Israeli military regulations, soldiers may open fire
only in life-threatening situations. The army announced that it had
opened two investigations into the shooting.
In more than three years of violence, 2,602 people have been killed
on the Palestinian side and 904 on the Israeli side. Israel has routinely
used live ammunition against Palestinian demonstrators who sometimes
pose a threat and sometimes do not, according to Yariv Oppenheimer
of the dovish Israeli group Peace Now. But this shooting appeared
to be the first time Israeli troops fired live rounds at a Jewish
Israeli protester.
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon told his Cabinet that the barrier needs
to be protected, but Israel has to use the appropriate means for dispersing
demonstrators.
The incident occurs amid an outcry from hundreds of army reservists,
including dozens from elite combat units, who are refusing to serve
their compulsory duty in the West Bank and Gaza Strip to protest what
they say is pervasive mistreatment of Palestinians.
Noam Hoffstater, a spokesman for the Israeli human rights group Btselem,
said the shooting offered an opportunity to demonstrate our
armys open-fire regulations in the occupied territories in a
way the Israeli public might understand and listen to.
When Palestinians tell their stories, a lot of Israelis find
them very hard to believe, Hoffstater added. There is
a huge gap between how we see ourselves and what we do in the West
Bank and Gaza. But when it happens to an Israeli, we must face the
reality. We cant defend ourselves.
The demonstration shooting also came on the heels of several other
West Bank incidents involving the Israeli army and Palestinian villages.
On Dec. 22, Israeli troops captured a Hamas leader and shot dead five-year-old
Mohammed al-Araj in the nearby Balata refugee camp. Doctors said the
boy was hit in the chest.
Israeli military sources said the clash occurred when Palestinian
youths pelted soldiers with stones, bottles and bricks. They said
troops opened fire in the direction of an attacker who was trying
to detonate a bomb.
A fifteen year old boy was also shot and killed in the same town,
one week prior. The army claims to be investigating the deaths.
One day later, on Dec. 23, Israeli soldiers shot and killed eight
Palestinians, including three civilians, in a raid on the Rafah refugee
camp along the Gaza-Egypt border. 41 other people, including nine
children, were wounded by Israeli gunfire, hospital officials said.
Four of the injured were in critical condition.
The army said the raid was aimed at exposing weapons smuggling tunnels
and that troops had fired in response to attacks by Palestinian militants.
After the attack, the army raided a nearby village, destroying six
houses and razing several farms. The army had no immediate comment
on the second raid.
These latest clashes came at a time when Israeli and Palestinian officials
began laying the groundwork for a summit between their respective
prime ministers, Ariel Sharon and Ahmed Qureia. The chief Palestinian
negotiator, Saeb Erakat, predicted that the meeting, their first since
Qureia took office, could be place as early as the first week of January
.
Ehud Olmert, Israels Deputy Prime Minister, said in Jerusalem
that Sharons new plan, to make progress towards an agreement
within months, or take unilateral action to separate Israelis and
Palestinians - was irreversible. He told foreign correspondents
that the Israeli pull-back would mean moving tens of thousands
of the 220,000 Jewish settlers in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The
settlers have threatened to mobilize thousands of supporters to resist
evacuation.
Olmert explained that Israel was giving the international road-map
peace plan another chance. We are giving the new Palestinian
government a hand to work together to reach an agreement, he
said. But if we see that it doesnt work, we cant
wait for another government. We have to change the status quo.
Sources: AFP, International Solidarity
Movement, Reuters, Associated Press, Independent UK
|