WINNER OF SEVEN PROJECT CENSORED AWARDS

No. 259, Jan. 1-7, 2004

SECCIÓN EN ESPAÑOL
To read an article, click on the headline.

Bush admin. opens last North
American rainforest to logging

The Tongass National Forest, the only remaining rainforest in North America, provides critical habitat for the American bald eagle, grizzly bear, coho salmon, humpback whale, and Sitka black-tail deer, among others.

Mad cow disease exposes
meat industry negligence

Questions raised after
shooting of Israeli protester

Does Col. Sanders have his head up his ass?
Selective memory and a dishonest doctrine
Campaign finance: Ashcroft above the law
Activists alarmed at new Colombian anti-terrorism law
Sex workers seek recognition in Kenya
The troubled marriage of environmentalists and oil companies
Empowerment through entitlement: the 'Rise of the Creative Class'
Israel muzzles Palestinian journalists
Francia-EEUU, enésimo round


Quote of the Week

“And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid?”

- Benjamin Franklin, Constitutional Convention, June 28, 1787, as quoted in Dick and Lynne Cheney’s 2003 holiday cards

 



AGR is ON THE AIR!

103.5 FM WPVM

Tune in for news from the frontlines

Mondays 8 am
Tuesdays 11 am
Wednesdays 2 pm
Thursdays 4 pm
Fridays 6 pm


Bush admin. opens last North American
rainforest to logging

Compiled by Eamon Martin

Dec. 29 (AGR)— Capping more than 10 years of intense controversy over the fate of some of the nation’s last remaining old-growth forest and igniting howls of protest from conservationists, the Bush administration on Dec. 23 removed prohibitions on logging and development from 9 million acres of the United States’ largest national forest, the Tongass of southeastern Alaska.

The Bush administration rule, led by US Undersecretary of Agriculture Mark Rey, a former timber lobbyist, announced the day before Christmas Eve, exempts the Tongass National Forest from the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. This landmark conservation policy was designed to protect 58.5 million acres of pristine national forest land from logging and roadbuilding. The new rule exempting the Tongass is the result of a deal to end a court challenge to the roadless rule brought by the State of Alaska.

The roadless rule was put in place after a two-year process that included 600 scientific studies and two rounds of public comments that generated almost two million responses, most of them in favor of the rule.

The Tongass contains nearly 30 percent of the world’s unlogged coastal temperate rainforest. At risk are the habitats of the North American grizzly bear, bald eagle, coho salmon, humpback whale, and Sitka black-tail deer, among others.

Widespread opposition to undoing the Tongass protections was expressed this summer when the public sent more than a quarter of a million comments in opposition to the proposal. These comments followed more than two million comments supporting the roadless rule in response to prior notices.

But Rey recently dismissed the public outcry as “not a referendum” and the he would not “count votes” from the public.

“The Bush administration has turned its back on the public, good science, and the law in its effort to clear-cut the Tongass,” said Tom Waldo, an attorney for environmental watchdog group Earthjustice. “This is obviously a Christmas present from the Bush administration to the timber industry which wants the right to clear-cut in America’s greatest temperate rainforest.”

Bush administration officials claimed the decision would result in the logging of only about 3 percent of the forest.

But environmental groups countered that because the parcels to be cut are spread across much of the landscape, roads built to provide loggers with access will end up disturbing much more of the temperate coastal rainforest —four times as much, according to US Forest Service estimates.

Dennis Neill, public affairs officer for the national forest said plenty of intact forest will be left. About 6.7 million acres of the 16.8 million-acre forest is permanently off-limits to all development. The current forest plan envisions allowing logging only about 676,000 acres, of which 330,000 acres are affected by yesterday’s decision.

“This place is not going to be a 16 million-acre stump field. It’s not happening,” he said. “Yeah, we’re going to cut some trees. That’s part of our job. It’s part of our mission. Congress passes the budget every year and tells us to do that.”

Environmentalists also attacked the decision for it’s timing.

“We were anticipating this would come down right before Christmas” when the news would get less attention, said Nicole Whittington-Evans, assistant regional director of The Wilderness Society. “This is just a clear pattern with the Bush administration where they ignore public comment, both inside and outside Alaska, which favored protection of the Tongass roadless areas, and just basically line the pockets of corporate interests.”

Administration officials also plan to remove the roadless-rule protections at the nation’s second-largest national forest, the Chugach, near Anchorage.

Environmental groups supported the roadless rule as a way to curb the development and logging that had already affected half of national forest land. But Western states and the timber industry said the rule was unjustified in its sweeping scope — touching about 30 percent of national forest acreage in the country.

Industry groups and states have made a concerted effort to attack the rule through lawsuits around the country. In July, a federal district court judge in Wyoming suspended the rule nationwide. Environmental groups are appealing the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, in Denver.

Before that, a federal court in Idaho originally threw out the roadless rule, but that decision was overturned last December by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco.

“Rather than wait for a resolution, the administration has indicated that it will move administratively to give individual governors the right to ignore the rule. That would seem to pre-empt the judicial process. It would also give a handful of state officials power over federal lands, which belong to all Americans,” the New York Times responded in an editorial.

The Tongass National Forest has been particularly contentious because it is the only temperate rainforest on the continent.

“This is the rarest forest type on earth and it needs to be protected,” said Jeremy Paster, a forest campaign organizer for Greenpeace.

Amy Mall of the Natural Resources Defense Council, said it would open to development “the most valuable habitat from one of our most important forests and one of the most ancient forests worldwide. The trees they want to log are the biggest and oldest.”

Of the more than 250,000 comments the agency received, she said, fewer than 2,000 favored the rule.

Sources: Earthjustice, New York Times, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Washington Post


Mad cow disease exposes meat industry negligence

By Liz Allen

Dec. 31 (AGR) — The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced on Dec. 23 that the disease known as Bovine Spongiform Encephalophy (BSE) or mad cow disease was found in a dairy cow slaughtered in Mabton, Washington on Dec. 9.

USDA officials are currently claiming that the cow may have come from Canada. BSE is contagious, fatal, and affects the central nervous system. The disease can incubate for four or five years before symptoms appear.

BSE is generally thought to be transmitted through the consumption of prion proteins, agents that are modified forms of components of normal cell surfaces. They are found in food containing meat from infected animals. Cattle catch the disease because of the common meat industry practice of putting animal parts into livestock feed for extra protein.

There is a 1997 law in the US prohibiting cattle farmers from feeding their animals feed that contains brain or spinal cord tissue. According to the USDA the disease is contagious through the consumption of brain, spine or lower intestine matter from infected animals. Enforcement of the 1997 law is weak, causing a higher risk for infection.

Humans who consume beef contaminated with BSE can catch a similar disease, a variant of Creutzfeldt - Jakob Disease (vCJD). The disease is fatal. Although some neurologic symptoms may appear, brain abnormalities cannot be detected through an MRI or x-ray until vCJD is already in its late stages. The USDA is maintaining that US meat is still safe to consumers, and their recall of over 10,803 pounds of beef is acting in “an abundance of precaution.”

The USDA claims to have tested 20,000 cattle for Mad Cow Disease in 2002 and 2003, however, according to United Press International (UPI) news service, the USDA has not produced documents pertaining to those tests, despite requests over a series of months since July, 2003. UPI reported that USDA official Michael Marquis responded to the initial request that same month, promising that if any such documents exist, they would be forwarded.

However, UPI also reports that no phone calls, made periodically since July through December, were returned. UPI called the USDA’s failure to produce documents a violation on a 30-day limit by the Freedom of Information Act.

How long BSE has been in the US is a point of controversy. The USDA reports that the only previous case was a young woman in the US and she is believed to have contracted the disease while previously living in the UK, where the largest outbreak of BSE and vCJD occurred.

However, critics say that BSE has been in the US for many years, and is a result of mistreatment of animals in the industry, inadequate testing and lax industry oversight.

Wayne Pacelle, a senior vice-president of the United States Humane Society, pointed to the slaughtering of “downer” animals as a threat to the US meat industry’s safety standards. “Downer” animals are animals too sick to stand or walk and are usually spent dairy cattle.

The infected cow was identified as a downer cow, but was originally identified as having partial paralysis due to complications from pregnancy, and although she was tested for BSE she was sent to the slaughterhouse anyway.

He called these animals the prime carriers of BSE and referred to a 2001 study in Germany that found the cows up to 240 times more likely to be a carrier of BSE. Pacelle called for laws banning the slaughtering of downer animals. He said such legislation was passed last year by US House and Senate, but was killed in conference after heavy lobbying by the dairy industry.

Also, in question is the testing technique for the disease, which takes a longer time to process than the tests that are conducted in Europe. Plus, the industry only tests a small percentage of the 35 million cattle that are commercially slaughtered each year.

Retired USDA veterinarian Michael Schwochert reported to UPI that in the last six months he had seen a cow who appeared to have the BSE, who was sent out on a special truck before USDA officials saw and the people working in the office at the meat processing plant were told not to say anything about the incident.

“Organic” beef is increasingly seen as a safer option, because the cattle receive more individualized attention, and do not eat feed containing antibiotics, hormones or high-protein animal waste and blood.

Also, organically raised cattle are rarely slaughtered when too sick to walk. But organic cattle are not necessarily free from mad cow disease because not all causes of the disease are known and calves from a non-organic cow could have been exposed to the disease.

The US beef industry accumulated $2.6 billion in overseas beef sales with 80 percent being sold to Japan, South Korea and Mexico. Already 11 countries have banned beef imported from the US.

On Dec. 29 the US entered into negotiations with Japan to attempt to lift the ban on beef, although Japan refused. At least four major grocery chains on the west coast in the US have voluntarily removed US beef from their shelves. As of Dec. 26, McDonald’s is reported to have suffered a 5 percent slide in sales and the US dollar is sliding to another low against the euro.

The USDA continues to insist that their beef supply is safe. US Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman insisted that she would be serving US beef at her holiday dinner. Previously the USDA and the FDA placed limits importing products such as food, food ingredients, dietary supplements and cosmetics from countries that had documented cases of BSE.


Questions raised after shooting of Israeli protester

Compiled by Joshua Ferguson

Dec. 29 (AGR) — Israeli soldiers on Friday, December 26 shot and wounded an Israeli and an American who were among protesters trying to breach a controversial barrier Israel is building in the West Bank, witnesses said.

The protesters were demanding that the gate near the West Bank village of Mascha be opened so farmers could tend their fields. When it was not, they cut the fence with pliers, eventually creating a hole large enough for a person to walk through, according to an Associated Press photographer on the scene.

On the other side, about half a dozen Israeli soldiers, who appeared panicked and unprepared, demanded they stop, fired several bullets in the air and then shot at their legs

The army, confirming two people were wounded, said in a statement that soldiers opened fire only after several protesters became violent and tried to cut through the fence.

One of the wounded was 22-year-old Gil Naamati, an Israeli who had just completed three years of military service as a combat soldier. He was shot in both legs and was hospitalized soon after. The American identified herself as Anne Farina, 26. She was only slightly wounded.

The two were part of a group of an estimated 500 foreign and Palestinian protesters demonstrating against the building of an Israeli wall that Israel claims will help prevent suicide bombers from crossing over into Israeli territory. Opponents claim that the fence will encroach upon Palestinian land, in some cases already dividing villages and separating farmers from their fields.

Palestinian officials said the shooting supported their long-standing contention that Israeli troops are too quick to use lethal force. “It shows how liberal the army is in using live ammunition against peaceful demonstrators,” said Dr. Mustafa Barghouti, who leads a Palestinian group monitoring the violence.

In many previous shootings involving Palestinians, the Israeli military has routinely said that soldiers followed strict rules of engagement on the use of live ammunition. The military does not divulge the specific rules, but in most instances, soldiers are to use other means, like tear gas or rubber bullets, unless they believe they are in danger, military officials say.

The protesters say they had no weapons and did not throw stones or otherwise endanger the soldiers, who they said were 20 to 40 yards away, on the far side of the fence. “We didn’t threaten soldiers,” Naamati said in the only interview he gave from his hospital bed, to the army radio. “All we hurt was the fence. The fence does not threaten lives. We did not threaten anyone’s life.” . Naamati acknowledged he was among those shaking the fence and trying to cut through it. But he added, “I am familiar with the rules of engagement, and what I did was not even close to something that I think would warrant opening fire.”

The army said it would investigate, but an Israeli military source said the soldiers operated according to procedure after they told protesters to move away from the fence and fired warning shots into the air.

“Anyone who attacks the security fence is considered suspicious, and this behavior is a (legitimate) reason for soldiers to begin conducting arrest procedures . . . It doesn’t matter who the person is,” the source said.

Hard-line Cabinet minister Uzi Landau said the soldiers had to stop the protesters, or it would have set a bad precedent and encouraged others to break through the barrier. “Anyone who destroys the fence is assisting terrorism,” he said.

According to Israeli military regulations, soldiers may open fire only in life-threatening situations. The army announced that it had opened two investigations into the shooting.

In more than three years of violence, 2,602 people have been killed on the Palestinian side and 904 on the Israeli side. Israel has routinely used live ammunition against Palestinian demonstrators who sometimes pose a threat and sometimes do not, according to Yariv Oppenheimer of the dovish Israeli group Peace Now. But this shooting appeared to be the first time Israeli troops fired live rounds at a Jewish Israeli protester.

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon told his Cabinet that the barrier needs to be protected, but Israel has to use the appropriate means for dispersing demonstrators.

The incident occurs amid an outcry from hundreds of army reservists, including dozens from elite combat units, who are refusing to serve their compulsory duty in the West Bank and Gaza Strip to protest what they say is pervasive mistreatment of Palestinians.

Noam Hoffstater, a spokesman for the Israeli human rights group B’tselem, said the shooting offered an opportunity “to demonstrate our army’s open-fire regulations in the occupied territories in a way the Israeli public might understand and listen to.”

“When Palestinians tell their stories, a lot of Israelis find them very hard to believe,” Hoffstater added. “There is a huge gap between how we see ourselves and what we do in the West Bank and Gaza. But when it happens to an Israeli, we must face the reality. We can’t defend ourselves.”

The demonstration shooting also came on the heels of several other West Bank incidents involving the Israeli army and Palestinian villages.

On Dec. 22, Israeli troops captured a Hamas leader and shot dead five-year-old Mohammed al-Araj in the nearby Balata refugee camp. Doctors said the boy was hit in the chest.

Israeli military sources said the clash occurred when Palestinian youths pelted soldiers with stones, bottles and bricks. They said troops opened fire in the direction of an attacker who was trying to detonate a bomb.

A fifteen year old boy was also shot and killed in the same town, one week prior. The army claims to be investigating the deaths.

One day later, on Dec. 23, Israeli soldiers shot and killed eight Palestinians, including three civilians, in a raid on the Rafah refugee camp along the Gaza-Egypt border. 41 other people, including nine children, were wounded by Israeli gunfire, hospital officials said. Four of the injured were in critical condition.

The army said the raid was aimed at exposing weapons smuggling tunnels and that troops had fired in response to attacks by Palestinian militants.

After the attack, the army raided a nearby village, destroying six houses and razing several farms. The army had no immediate comment on the second raid.

These latest clashes came at a time when Israeli and Palestinian officials began laying the groundwork for a summit between their respective prime ministers, Ariel Sharon and Ahmed Qureia. The chief Palestinian negotiator, Saeb Erakat, predicted that the meeting, their first since Qureia took office, could be place as early as the first week of January .

Ehud Olmert, Israel’s Deputy Prime Minister, said in Jerusalem that Sharon’s new plan, to make progress towards an agreement within months, or take unilateral action to separate Israelis and Palestinians - was “irreversible.” He told foreign correspondents that the Israeli pull-back would mean moving “tens of thousands” of the 220,000 Jewish settlers in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The settlers have threatened to mobilize thousands of supporters to resist evacuation.

Olmert explained that Israel was giving the international “road-map” peace plan another chance. “We are giving the new Palestinian government a hand to work together to reach an agreement,” he said. “But if we see that it doesn’t work, we can’t wait for another government. We have to change the status quo.”

Sources: AFP, International Solidarity Movement, Reuters, Associated Press, Independent UK