|
Murdoch launches sexist channel
On Jan. 12 a new satellite channel aimed at adultman took
to the airwaves. Regular programs include G-string Divas and
a game show called My Big Fat Obnoxious Fiancé. On
Jan. 15 it will be followed by two major magazine launches: Nuts, a weekly
targeted at the same market, and Sorted, a monthly catering for little
lads between the ages of 11 and 16. Zoo Weekly, which promises girls,
football and funny stuff will follow.
The television channel, FX UK, is from Rupert Murdochs Fox stable.
Among early highlights is The Man Show, described as a
woman-free zone, unless theyre in bikinis and bouncing on trampolines.
Foxs vice president of broadcasting and marketing for the UK, Jason
Thorpe, said the channel would appeal to the universal interests
of men aged 25-44. (Independent (UK))
Iraqi official threatens to overturn US contract
Iraqs communications minister on Jan. 9 threatened to overturn a
politically sensitive contract awarded to an American company to run Iraqs
national broadcasting service.
The Harris Corporation, a US manufacturer, was selected that day with
the Lebanese Broadcasting Company and a Kuwaiti-Iraq group, Al-Fawares,
to carry out a $100million, one-year contract to rebuild and operate a
newspaper and a group of Iraqi television and radio stations used by Saddam
Husseins regime.
But Haider Abadi, communications minister, said he was not consulted about
the contract and threatened to overturn it when the US-led administration
hands power to a sovereign Iraqi government in July.
The media contract has been a source of controversy for the US-led coalition.
SAIC, a US defense contractor first recruited by the Pentagon, was widely
criticized for poor quality and pro-American bias. Critics dubbed its
television operation the Pentagons Pravda for its broadcasting
of English-language press conferences with an Arabic voiceover.
Several prospective bidders, including the BBC, withdrew from the tendering
process amid concern that the contract would not guarantee the independence
of the broadcaster from state interference. Without firm regulations,
broadcasters said they feared they would be subject to political influence.
(Financial Times (UK))
|