|
Do or Die:
Voices from the ecological resistance
By Skyler Simmons
Mar. 29 (AGR) After 10 years of publishing what started
out as a zine, Do or Die (DoD) presents us with its final issue chock
full (397 pages) of incendiary analysis, in-depth news reports, and
exciting accounts from direct actions around the world.
For those not familiar with DoD, it is a publication born out of the
radical environmental movement in Britain that came to rise in the early
90s. It has a strong anti-authoritarian tone, with an emphasis
on ecology and direct action. Issue #10 does not fail the reader in
delivering yet another round of enticing reading.
It starts out with a 100 page (dont worry, theres lots of
pictures too) farewell manifesto of sorts that offers an insightful
(as well as inciting) vision of where the radical environmental and
anti-globalization movement should go from here. This begins with a
brief movement history of the last ten years, mostly focused on Britain.
While some of this may seem irrelevant to folks in the US it provides
a good parallel to compare our own activism to. It moves on to emphasize
the need to grow countercultures. We need to catalyse living,
loving, fighting countercultures that can sustain rebellion across generations.
In both collective struggle and our everyday lives we must try to live
our ecological and libertarian principles. The author of the essay
sees alternative infrastructure such as community gardens, social centers,
and squats as essential for sustaining a radical resistance movement,
because they create autonomous zones where we can truly practice what
we preach.
The essay moves on to emphasize the need to escalate our tactics due
to the ever-more imminent threat of ecological meltdown and how we should
prepare for the likely backlash from the state due to any militant resistance.
We must have the ability to defend ourselves, survive, and exploit
crises in society, including capitalist attempts to destroy us. The
divided and industrial nature of todays society has already determined
the instability of tomorrow. Its not a pretty picture that
is painted, but its an important concept that radicals must examine
if we are serious about achieving our goals.
One thing that is unique about this journal is its attention to majority
world struggles. Abandoning the Euro-centric action reports that
fill so many radical periodicals, there is a wealth of information on
struggles from Papua New Guinea, to recent insurrections in Algeria,
to tree-sits in Ecuador. This includes an interesting interview with
Native American activist and former political prisoner Rod Coronado
that covers everything from sabotage to spirituality. Another interview
highlights an anarchist feminist group in Bolivia and the political
work they do in their country.
The Do or Die collective puts a lot of emphasis on creating active solidarity
with majority world struggles as they are often fighting on the frontlines
of a battle that is largely created by industrialized nations consumption
of raw materials and cheap labor.
The counter-culture must act in real solidarity with our struggling
sisters and brothers on other islands. Aid them in whatever we can and
bring the majority world battlefronts to the boardrooms,
bedrooms, and barracks of the bourgeosie. In other words, we,
as activists in the belly of the beast, are in a unique position, and
in fact are obligated, to lend a hand to those who are most affected
by modern day colonialism.
Another strong point for DoD is its willingness to critically examine
everything it reports on. There is very little of the unquestioning
praise for different movements that is often found in radical journals.
At the same time the criticism that it does offer is generally constructive
and shies away from the cheap shots and character assassinations that
sometimes pass for critical journalism.
If you are looking for inspiring stories of resistance to the current
world order, or you want to explore a fresh perspective of how we might
go about creating radical change in our society and for the Earth, I
recommend picking up a copy of DoD #10.
Justice Dept. accused of nuclear
plant cover-up
Denver, Colorado, Mar. 27 Secret midnight burning of radioactive
waste. An FBI spy flight with infrared cameras. An employee who contends
she was contaminated by fellow workers for reporting safety violations.
It sounds like something out of a paperback thriller. But the allegations
are contained in a new book that says the Justice Department covered
up environmental misconduct at the former Rocky Flats nuclear weapons
plant near Denver more than a decade ago.
Federal and state health officials say they are looking into the claims
raised by the book, The Ambushed Grand Jury: How the Justice Department
Covered Up Government Nuclear Crimes and How We Caught Them Red Handed.
The book was written by Wes McKinley, the foreman of a grand jury that
investigated activity at Rocky Flats, and attorney Caron Balkany. They
said the book is worth the risk of jail for violating grand jury secrecy
rules.
I am doing my patriotic duty, McKinley said. These
people are criminals.
In addition to interviews with former plant workers and investigators,
the authors relied on a journal McKinley kept during the grand jury
sessions. They said they were able to independently confirm all of the
evidence discussed in the book.
A former federal prosecutor denied the allegations, and the plants
former operator, Rockwell International, said all the claims have been
investigated and found to be groundless.
Rocky Flats, situated on the edge of the foothills outside Denver, made
plutonium triggers from the 1950s until 1989. The Energy Department
complex is being cleaned up and officials hope to turn it into a wildlife
refuge by 2006.
Tipped about potential safety violations, the FBI in 1988 used infrared
cameras during flights over Rocky Flats and detected what agents said
was a burning incinerator in Building 771, the plutonium-reprocessing
facility. At that time, the building was supposed to be shut down after
an employee was exposed to radiation. FBI and Environmental Protection
Agency officials raided the plant in 1989 as part of an investigation
called Operation Desert Glow.
Investigators subsequently looked at whether Rockwell knowingly discharged
chemicals into creeks that flowed into municipal water supplies, burned
toxic waste, and failed to adequately monitor groundwater.
From 1989 to 1992, a federal grand jury heard testimony and reviewed
evidence against Rockwell. The panel wanted to indict eight people and
two corporations involved with Rocky Flats, and recommended closing
the plant.
But then-US Attorney Michael Norton refused to sign the indictments
and worked out a plea bargain.
Rockwell pleaded guilty to 10 hazardous waste and clean water violations
in 1992 and was fined $18.5 million. The company admitted it stored
hazardous waste without a permit, in containers that leaked, and that
its actions caused hazardous waste to wind up in reservoirs that supplied
drinking water to nearby cities.
A Justice Department review of the plea bargain supported the prosecutors.
The review said a charge of illegal burning had to be withdrawn because
Allen Divers, a former military analyst who was working for Lockheed
and who reviewed the infrared photos, had changed his mind and could
not be sure. However, the books authors contacted Divers, who
said he had never changed his opinion. Divers confirmed this in a telephone
interview with the Associated Press.
The grand jurys report remains sealed, and as recently as this
month, US District Judge Richard Matsch refused to allow grand jurors
to break their oath and speak publicly about the case.
Matsch did not respond to a request seeking comment.
Jeff Dorschner, spokesman for the US attorneys office in Denver,
would not comment on whether McKinley would be prosecuted for violating
grand jury secrecy.
The book includes material from interviews with FBI agent Jon Lipsky,
who led a raid on the plant in 1989, and Jacque Brever, a Rockwell employee
who worked in a building where processed plutonium was stored.
My superiors have ordered me to lie about a criminal investigation
I headed in 1989. We were investigating the Department of Energy, but
the US Justice Department covered up the truth, Lipsky said in
the book. He confirmed his statement in a brief telephone interview
with the AP.
Brevers account is more chilling. She said she is suffering from
thyroid cancer she believes is the result of her fellow union workers
deliberately damaging her protective gear because they feared her testimony
would force the shutdown of the plant and cost them their jobs.
Officials at the Energy Department did not return calls or an e-mail
seeking comment.
Source: Boston Globe
Occupation Must End Yesterday
Jerusalem Women Speak
By Susan Pepper
Mar. 30 (AGR) Michal Sagi, a Jewish Israeli, gives up
her Saturdays to monitor checkpoints around Jerusalem. If you
are a Palestinian living in the surrounding areas of the city, you must
cross various checkpoints to perform any of the mundane tasks of daily
living such as shopping, a visit with the doctor, or if you are so bold,
a visit with friends. You must show a different kind of pass depending
on the nature of your excursion.
Sagi explained that ninety percent of the barriers separate not Israelis
from Palestinians but rather Palestinians from Palestinians.
One beautiful morning, Sagi was walking when she saw Israeli police
point their guns at a young Palestinian female student and asked her
to lift her shirt. Their presumption was to ensure she was not
hiding any bombs.
Sagi knew it was an outrageous request, since the girl was wearing a
thin shirt that could not hide anything anyway.
Sagi shouted something at the police, where upon, they turned their
guns at her and asked her to mind her own business. Sagi just
stood there and tried to give them the most piercing stare she could
muster.
Upon witnessing the mistreatment of this young Palestinian woman by
the Israeli police, Sagi decided that attending protests and signing
petitions once in awhile was not adequate.
She became actively involved with Checkpoint Watch, a womens human
rights group which reports on its observations of Israeli military at
police checkpoints in the occupied Palestinian Territories.
Sagi said, I am going out to the checkpoint to protest and to
show both Palestinians and Israelis that there is a different voice
calling to keep human rights and remove checkpoints.
In addition, the presence of the women from Checkpoint Watch performs
various functional roles. It helps reduce the rudeness of the
soldiers.
The women relay information about the daily conditions at the checkpoints
to Palestinians waiting at the back of the line. On certain days,
only people of a certain category -- whether it be their age or the
nature of their outing -- are permitted to get through.
The women from Checkpoint are a resource that that enables Palestinians
to anticipate and to improve their chances of getting through. On
occasion, the women act as mediators and can encourage the guards to
be more flexible with the Palestinians than they otherwise are.
Sagi talked about how difficult it is for her to leave the Checkpoint
at the end of her shift. Its very hard to go away
once
you go, things will be harder for the people. When she returns
to her home, the cleanliness, quiet, and comfort are a stark contrast
from the dusty, dirty checkpoints where the temperatures are either
too hot or bitter cold. She no longer takes for granted the security
she feels at her home.
Unlike her Palestinian friends, she can trust that no one will
enter her house without her permission. No one will tell her what
to do in her apartment. She knows she can plan to have a meal
with friends at a certain hour and that they will have food and will
be able to congregate. Sagi said, These trivial things should
be trivial for everyone.
Sagi wonders what is happening to her society. Speaking about
the Israeli soldiers, on average eighteen or nineteen years old, she
said, The gun is part of the hand now and they are waving it all
around the place.
If not to restore the humanity of the Palestinians than for Israelis,
occupation must end yesterday.
Michal Sagi spoke last Sunday at churches in Asheville and Black Mountain.
She, along with Nahla Assali and Nuha Khoury, both Palestinian
women from Jerusalem, are currently on a 17-day tour in the USA sponsored
by Partners for Peace, a non-profit and UN registered non-governmental
organization based in Washington, DC.
When reality is just an illusion
By Josh Sims
Mar. 29 Uday and Qusay Hussein are holed up in a villa in
the northern Iraqi city of Mosul. And you have got a crucial decision
to make: should you storm the building? Intelligence reports suggest that
opposition forces have been under-estimated; satellite imagery shows that
the approach would leave many soldiers exposed; and graphic modelling
of the interior reveals a potentially unbreachable stronghold for gunmen.
What do you do?
Such life-and-death dilemmas are now the stuff of living-room entertainment,
thanks to Kuma:War, a PC game which went online earlier this month, offering
a radical alternative to the conventional shoot-em-up video game.
As a player in its computer-generated combat zone, all the information
is purportedly factual, culled from respected wire services, from contacts
within the Pentagon, from transmitted and incidental video reportage,
declassified Department of Defense reports, and pricey satellite photos,
assisted by top-rank military advice and presented, not so much for the
thrill of the kill, as for your improved understanding of the intricacies
of recent historic events.
While the Kuma:War launch package, produced by Kuma Reality Games, focuses
on incidents from the Iraq war, subscribers to the web site can also play
out key moments in Afghanistan and the dispute between North and South
Korea. It costs $10 a month for unlimited access to a growing number of
continually updated missions, during which gamers re-enact the events
at close quarters, and through gamesmanship, try alternative histories
to see how the news might have turned out.
We live between being the news and being a game, says Keith
Halper, CEO of the New York-based news-cum-games service. We wanted
to put people in the middle of situations they read about or see on TV
so as to better understand them.
Kuma claims to be able to take an event of global newsworthiness and create
a simulation within three to eight weeks, and plans to launch simulations
of crime and sports events early next year.
Some people have expressed concern about Kumas melding of news and
entertainment. Clearly this kind of game is going to be deeply interactive,
and wherever you cross the boundaries between real life and screen life,
the danger of confusing the two is presented, suggests psychologist
Professor Mark Griffiths of Nottingham Trent University, who is an authority
on the effects of online games playing.
Adult players wont end up with a distorted view of the reality,
though its a very different story for the young, adds Griffiths.
Reality games can alter the way you perceive the world, and condition
stereotypes. That said, the familiarity of the games subjects, the
fact that many of these news events will already be known to the players,
may work to enhance their empathy.
The military uses the likes of its free Americas Army online game
to recruit. The anti-war movement uses games such as Velvet-Strike (a
hack that allows you to spray paint the walls in Counter-Strike) to protest.
And the media, especially in the US, uses games graphics to explain military
strategy. And Henry Jenkins, director of the comparative media studies
program at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Boston, asks, is the
commercial games industry now simply seeing if we are ready to filter
our understanding of war through games much as previous generations have
through films? The Palestinian Liberation Organization has already launched
Under Ash, their own politically-oriented game, and Sony has trademarked
shock and awe as a title for a planned, but since abandoned,
Iraq war game.
Source: Independent Digital (UK)
|