|
Occupiers spend millions on private
army of security men
By Robert Fisk and Severin Carrell
London, UK, Mar. 28An army of thousands of mercenaries
has appeared in Iraqs major cities, many of them former British
and American soldiers hired by the occupying Anglo-American authorities
and by dozens of companies who fear for the lives of their employees.
Many of the armed Britons are former SAS (Special Air Service) soldiers
and heavily armed South Africans are also working for the occupation.
My people know how to use weapons and theyre all SAS,
said the British leader of one security team in southern Baghdad. But
there are people running around with guns now who are just cowboys.
We always conceal our weapons, but these guys think theyre in
a Hollywood film.
There are serious doubts even within the occupying power about Americas
choice to send Chilean mercenaries, many trained during General Pinochets
vicious US backed dictatorship, to guard the Baghdad airport. Many South
Africans are in Iraq illegally - they are breaking new laws, passed
by the government in Pretoria, to control South Africas booming
export of mercenaries. Many have been arrested on their return home
because they do not have the license now required by private soldiers.
Casualties among the mercenaries are not included in the regular body
count put out by the occupation authorities, which may account for the
persistent suspicion among Iraqis that the US is underestimating its
figures of military dead and wounded. Some British experts claim that
private policing is now the UKs biggest export to Iraq - a growth
fueled by the surge in bomb attacks on coalition forces, aid agencies
and UN buildings since the official end of the war in May last year.
Many companies operate from villas in middle-class areas of Baghdad
with no name on the door. Some security men claim they can earn more
than $147,000 a year; but short-term, high-risk mercenary work can bring
much higher rewards. Security personnel working a seven-day contract
in cities like Fallujah, can make $1,000 a day.
Although they wear no uniform, some security men carry personal identification
on their flak jackets, along with their rifles and pistols.
Others refuse to identify themselves even in hotels, drinking beer by
the pool, their weapons at their feet. In several hotels, guests and
staff have complained that security men have held drunken parties and
one manager was forced to instruct mercenaries in his hotel that they
must carry their guns in a bag when they leave the premises. His demand
was ignored.
One British company director, David Claridge of the security firm Janusian,
has estimated that British firms have earned up to $1 billion from their
contracts in Iraq - barely a year after the invasion of Iraq. One British-run
firm, Erinys, employs 14,000 Iraqis as watchmen and security guards
to protect the countrys oil fields and pipelines.
The use of private security firms has led to some resentment amongst
the Department for International Developments (DFID) aid workers
- who fear it undermines the trust of Iraqi civilians. DFID staff
would prefer not to have this, said one source. Its
much easier for them to do their job without any visible security, but
the security risks are great down there.
One South African-owned firm, Meteoric Tactical Solutions, has a $50,000
contract with DFID which, it is understood, involves providing bodyguards
and drivers for its most senior official in Iraq and his small personal
staff.
Another British-owned company, ArmorGroup has an £876,000 contract
to supply 20 security guards for the Foreign Office. That figure will
rise by 50 per cent in July. The firm also employs about 500 Gurkhas
to guard executives with the US firms Bechtel and Kellogg Brown &
Root.
Opposition Members of Parliment Ps were shocked by the scale of the
Governments use of private firms to guard British civil servants,
and claimed it was further evidence that the British army was too small
to cope. Menzies Campbell, the Liberal Democrats foreign affairs
spokesman, said: This suggests that British forces are unable
to provide adequate protection and raises the vexed question of overstretch
- particularly in light of the remarks by the Chief of the Defense Staff,
last week that Britain couldnt stage another operation on the
scale of Iraq for another five years.
Andrew Robathan, a Tory MP on the international development select committee
and former SAS officer, said: The Army doesnt have the troops
to provide static guards on this scale. Surely it would have been cheaper
to have another battalion of troops providing guards.
The UKs largest private security firm in Iraq, Global Risk Strategies,
is helping the coalition provisional authority and the Iraqi administration
to draft new regulations. It is expecting to increase its presence from
1,000 to 1,200 staff this spring, and could reach 1,800 this year. However,
aid charities are disturbed by the sums being spent on security, since
DFID has diverted $1.5 million from its mainstream aid budget for Iraqi
reconstruction.
Dominic Nutt, of Christian Aid, said: This sticks in the craw.
Its right that DFID protects its staff, but this is robbing Peter
to pay Paul.
Source: Independent (UK)
Iraqi women find no end to their suffering
By Victoria Firmo-Fontan
Baghdad, Iraq, Mar. 28 For two days, 19-year-old Bedur
Ibrahim lay in the mortuary of the al-Kindi hospital. Her family refused
to collect her body, and the city authorities failed to provide a pathologists
report on her death.
Like all victims of violence here, Bedurs remains should have
been brought to the city morgue. But doctors in Baghdad have admitted
that - at the request of her parents - she was buried without ceremony
in a common grave at the municipal cemetery.
The reason was as shameful as it was routine. Like many other women
in Baghdad since the Anglo-American invasion a year ago, Bedur had been
abducted from her home by armed men, gang-raped and murdered.
Even the head of the city mortuary, Dr. Faqr Bakr, admitted to the Independent
on Sunday that he knew her family would not have collected her body
had it been sent to him.
Most women who suffer Bedurs fate leave no record of their ordeal.
But she lived just long enough after being shot to tell nurses at the
hospital what had happened.
Hanan Abdullah, the al-Kindi nurse who looked after Bedur until she
died of her extensive injuries, described a very distressed human
being who was looking for comfort in her last hours because she
had been shunned by those she cared for most - her own family. She
told me what happened. She said: They took me at gun point from
my home, raped me for 16 days and then they shot me.
Bedur was brought unconscious to the emergency department by the Khadmiya
police, with no details of her family. The police officer told the hospital
he would try to contact her father, but to no avail. We operated
on Bedur, and when she recovered consciousness she repeatedly asked
for her mother, said the nurse. When she realised that she
would never come, I think she gave up and let herself die.
According to the Iraqi honor system, a woman who has been
raped or abducted is considered to have brought shame upon her family.
Under Saddams regime, a rape victim would usually be killed by
a brother or father to restore family honour unless she agreed to marry
her abductor.
The day after Saddam Husseins capture, the US proconsul Paul Bremer
told Iraqis that there would be no more suffering. But Yannar
Mohammed, chairwoman of the Iraqi Womens Coalition (IWC), says
that since the end of the war, about 350 women have been abducted. The
few who survive their ordeal require protection from honour
killings by their family. The IWC is about to open the first womens
shelter in Baghdad, with no financial help from the occupation authorities.
The US State Department criticises countries which fail to curb human
trafficking, but the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq has treated
the fate of kidnapped women as an isolated phenomenon.
Source: Independent (UK)
US Major attacks Guantánamo justice
Lawyer says detainees face unfair trials
By Tania Branigan
Mar. 25 A US military lawyer representing a detainee at
Guantánamo Bay said yesterday that his client could not receive
justice under the existing system of military commissions.
The system is not set up to provide even the appearance of a fair
trial, said Major Michael Mori, who was appointed by the Pentagon
to defend the Australian detainee David Hicks.
If theres credible evidence, take him to an established
justice system, he said at a press conference in London given
by lawyers acting for the prisoners. If its not credible,
that doesnt justify changing the rules.
Two of the four Britons still being held at the US detention camp, Martin
Mubanga and Richard Belmar, have been named as potential defendants
in military hearings. The cases against the other two, Moazzam Begg
and Feroz Abbasi, have been suspended pending further talks with Britain.
The government has said all four men should be returned to Britain or
given fair trials. It said it was not satisfied with the current commission
rules.
Michael Ratner, the lawyer representing detainees in a US supreme court
case next month, told the press conference: The idea the British
government would let them go forward [for trial] is shocking.
The hearings are unlikely to proceed until the American supreme court
has ruled on whether US courts should have jurisdiction over the American
naval base in Cuba.
Theres no such place in the world as a law-free zone,
said Ratner, the president of the New York-based Center for Constitutional
Rights.
But Major John Smith, a military lawyer and the Pentagons spokesman
on the commissions, told the Guardian the detainees would receive full
and fair trials, as President George Bush had promised.
He said: The fact Major Mori is out there arguing his clients
case says a lot about the fact these will be fair trials and shows we
have provided vigilant defense lawyers. I support his zealous defense
but absolutely disagree with his assertions.
He claimed Mori had misrepresented the system. Different doesnt
always mean unfair, he said. Its very easy to be critical
of the process because people havent seen it in action.
Earlier Mori said that labeling the defendants as terrorists had allowed
the US government to lower its standards of justice. He said the system
lacked checks and balances, such as a truly independent appeal process.
The appointing authority, who approves the charges, is the same
person who gets to rule on defense motions, he said. He
is basically reviewing his own decisions ... its like letting
the bowler call leg before wicket.
When you use an unfair system, all you do is risk convicting the
innocent and providing somebody who is truly guilty with a valid complaint
to attack his conviction. It doesnt help anyone.
The major said he was afraid the prosecution would present hearsay evidence
in statements taken from detainees in Cuba whom he would be unable to
cross-examine.
Other lawyers expressed concern that after two years without access
to lawyers detainees were likely to invent information. Three of the
five released Britons have claimed to have signed false confessions
after lengthy interrogation and solitary confinement.
The Pentagon has dismissed the fears saying evidence would be ruled
out if it was not of probative value to a reasonable person.
Joseph Belmar, the father of one of the Britons still being held in
Cuba, accused the US of trying to smear detainees.
The Daily Telegraph (UK) recently quoted a senior US official as saying
that one Briton - subsequently identified by the Guardian as Richard
Belmar -- had trained at a terrorist camp in 1998.
But Belmar said his son had never been outside the UK until he visited
Pakistan in 2001. All this is a lie, he said. They
are trying to build up something against him so they can bring charges.
Ratner said: The government is trying to come up with anything
they can to justify their position. Why dont they charge people
if they have information?
Source: Guardian (UK)
Argentine president hands over former
torture center
By Marcela Valente
Buenos Aires, Mar. 24 (IPS) -- In a ceremony outside of the
Navy School of Mechanics (ESMA) the most notorious detention
center operated by Argentinas 1976-1983 dictatorship President
Néstor Kirchner apologized in the name of the state for the silence
that has surrounded the atrocities committed by the de facto regime.
On the 28th anniversary of the coup detat that gave rise to one
of Latin Americas bloodiest dictatorships some 30,000 dissidents
were disappeared, according to human rights groups
Kirchner lived up to two promises he had made to human rights
activists.
First, he ordered the army chief Wednesday to remove the portraits of
former dictators Jorge Videla and Reynaldo Bignone from a gallery in
the military school a gesture demanded by activists for the past
two decades.
In a second ceremony, held outside ESMA, he officially handed over the
19-hectare naval complex to local human rights organizations, which
will convert it into a memorial museum.
Visibly moved after hearing speeches by young people who were born in
ESMA when their parents were held there as political prisoners, Kirchner
told the crowd that I have come as the president, to apologize
in the name of the Argentine state for having remained silent regarding
such atrocities during 20 years of democracy.
This is neither rancour nor hatred. But we do not want impunity;
we want justice, said the president.
Those who committed such macabre and sinister acts
in clandestine detention centers like ESMA have only one name:
they are murderers, repudiated by all Argentines, said Kirchner,
to loud applause by the relatives of victims, represented by groups
like the Mothers and Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo.
Shortly before Emiliano Hueravillo, a young man who was born in ESMA,
went up on stage to speak, he told IPS that his parents were abducted
and taken to the detention center, and never heard from again.
His mother, Mirta Alonso, was seven-months pregnant when she was taken
away. When he was four-months old, he was left at the Pedro de Elizalde
hospital with a letter that gave his name and those of his parents.
Standing nearby, Karina Castro could hardly talk, she was so choked
up. But she managed to tell IPS that her mother, Graciela Campolongo,
was taken from her grandmothers home in 1976. Although the three-year-old
Graciela was there, she remembers nothing.
I dont know if she was at ESMA because we never heard anything
more from her. But I came because I believe this place is a symbol for
all of us, said Karina.
At least 5,000 of the disappeared were held at some point in ESMA, where
the officers club served as the torture center. Many of the political
prisoners who survived their torture sessions and interrogations
ended up being drugged and thrown alive into the sea from airplanes.
Juan Cabandié, 26, who like Emiliano was born in ESMA, said he
only found out his real identity two months ago, thanks to the efforts
of the Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo.
I always knew my name was Juan, he said, referring
to the name his mother gave him when he was born in a clandestine detention
center, and which he now uses.
Hundreds of babies born to the disappeared were stolen and raised by
military families.
The ceremony outside of ESMA ended with three songs: La Memoria
(Memory) and Todavía cantamos (We Are Still Singing)
performed by Argentine singer-songwriters León Gieco and Víctor
Heredia, respectively; and Para la libertad (For Freedom),
by Spanish singer-songwriter Joan Manuel Serrat.
Two hours before the ceremony, human rights groups hung banners with
the photos of thousands of disappeared on the bars surrounding ESMA.
Mabel Gutiérrez, a member of the group Relatives of Political
Prisoners and the Disappeared, read out a message that stated that the
presidents political decision and the 28 years of struggle by
the human rights groups to keep alive the memory of what happened made
it possible for ESMA to become the property of all
Argentines today.
Mario Villani, who attended Wednesdays ceremonies, was one of
a group of around 30 torture survivors who toured ESMA last Friday with
Kirchner.
Villani spent time in five different torture centers during the dictatorship.
The last place he was held in was ESMA, from which he was not released
until 1981.
I think I survived because Im a physicist, and I know something
about electronics, so they used me to fix TV sets and other household
appliances that they stole, he told IPS, referring to the
furnishings that the armed forces took from the homes of political prisoners,
which were stored in an ESMA warehouse.
Villani commented to IPS that when he returned to the world of
the living he refuses to say he was freed
because the Navy continued to keep surveillance over him he thought
he would want to kill one of his torturers with his own hands.
But that hatred, he explained, was transformed into a desire to fight
against impunity, and to make sure that those responsible for the human
rights crimes were brought to justice.
For rights groups, the removal of the portraits of the former dictators
from the walls of the Military School and the hand-over of ESMA were
two victories in their long struggle for justice.
There were a few signs of resistance by the military to Wednesdays
events. The portraits of the former dictators, which were removed by
General Roberto Bendini in the military school, were actually amplified
photos in gold frames put up hastily Tuesday after the original oil
paintings mysteriously vanished.
The ceremony itself, in which Kirchner stated that the democratic order
in Argentina must never again be subverted, was boycotted
by a small group of officers.
Although Bendini had suggested taking down the pictures prior to the
anniversary of the coup, and in private, the president insisted on making
it a public event to mark Mar. 24.
In addition, despite the fact that Navy chief, Admiral Jorge Godoy admitted
this month for the first time that aberrant acts were
committed in ESMA during the dirty war, several Navy officers
opposed the hand-over of the naval school.
The center-left Kirchner, who belongs to the Justicialista (Peronist)
Party, has taken a proactive stance on human rights since he took office
last May.
The president, who was himself an activist in the Peronist Youth and
who belongs to the generation of many of the disappeared leftists, said
at his inauguration that he was coming to the government as a
son of the Mothers and Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo.
I form part of a decimated generation, which was castigated with
painful absences, said the president, who was himself briefly
imprisoned twice during the dictatorship, and who saw many of his friends
and fellow activists disappear.
On his first day in office, on May 26, Kirchner ordered 27 army generals,
13 admirals and 12 brigadier-generals into retirement, in an unprecedented
purge of the military brass.
He later overturned a decree that blocked the extradition of former
members of the military wanted by foreign courts in connection with
the disappearance in Argentina of citizens from Spain, Italy and other
countries.
At the presidents behest, Congress annulled last August the amnesty
laws that in the late 1980s put an end to prosecutions of junior officers
and soldiers who were deemed to be following orders
when they committed human rights crimes.
After the amnesty laws were revoked, the courts reopened human rights
cases that had been closed in the late 1980s.
Last Monday, a federal judge declared unconstitutional the 1990 pardons
granted by then-president Carlos Menem (1989-1999) to the former members
of the dictatorships ruling junta, who had already been tried
and sentenced.
Thailands anti-privatization protesters
show their strength
By Marwaan Macan-Markar
Bangkok, Thailand, Mar. 28 (IPS) -- Thailands rapidly
expanding movement against privatization is placing its faith in democracy
to prove it has the edge over the government of Prime Minister Thaksin
Shinawatra.
At a public rally over the weekend here, which drew close to 10,000
supporters, activists reiterated a demand that has converted the governments
planned privatization of the state-owned power utility into a political
hot potato.
The government should seek public approval of the privatization of the
Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) by holding a referendum,
say the leaders of EGATs trade union, which has been at the vanguard
of the anti-privatization drive.
If Thaksin is averse to a referendum, he can test the popularity of
his privatization drive by making it an election campaign pledge, says
the president of the EGAT union, Sirichai Mai-ngam.
If the government is confident that it is doing the correct thing
for the country, it should seek peoples support for its privatization
policy at the next election, Sirichai told IPS. But
we dont think it will get public support, since more and more
people are with us.
Thaksins Thai Rak Thai (Thais Love Thai) party, which came to
power in January 2001 following a massive victory at the polls, is due
to face a national election in less than a year. During the past three
years, Thaksin has continued to enjoy high levels of popularity despite
a slew of government polices that faced a battery of criticism.
The demand for public participation in the decision to privatize EGAT
appears to resonate beyond the world of labor unions, as demonstrated
during Saturdays rally that was held in a field close to one the
countrys symbols of political and civil liberties, the Democracy
Monument.
Throwing his weight behind the unionists is Sulak Sivaraksa, one of
Thailands champions of grassroots causes and a trenchant critic
of the political establishment.
The public should decide at a referendum if the privatization policies
of the Thaksin administration are healthy for the country, Sulak asserted
at the rally, which was held under the banner, To Sell Or Not
To Sell: Let the Public Decide.
That the government can ill afford to ignore this snowballing issue
stems not only from the fact that an election is coming up, but that
the EGAT labor union has succeeded in sustaining the momentum of its
drive against privatization for over a month, which is significant in
the Thai labor scene.
Following its first show of strength on Feb. 23, when it took to the
streets with close to 10,000 people, the union has held daily, unbroken
protests, with one gathering attracting as many as 50,000 people. Support
for the EGAT union has also come from the unions of 41 other state enterprises,
labor rights activists from the private sector and representatives from
an estimated 130 civil society organizations, ranging from consumer
groups to environmentalists.
Even academics, students and non-governmental organizations championing
the concerns of Thailands rural poor have lined up with the EGAT
union.
Since Feb. 23, the government has issued mixed messages about its EGAT
plans that are under fire. Thaksin, for instance, went from striking
an uncompromising stance that he would not meet with union leaders to
sitting with them for a 20-minute meeting in mid-March. But that brief
encounter failed to resolve the growing differences between the two
sides.
Bangkok has not budged from its declared motive to privatize EGAT, which
not only monopolizes the countrys power sector but it is also
the most profitable of Thailands state ventures. For the government,
privatizing EGAT is part of a plan to convert state enterprises to private
entities. By registering it as a public company in the stock market,
the government was hoping to raise 1.8 billion US dollars.
That money, officials have argued, will go to pay for new projects to
meet the countrys power needs, rather than having the state borrow
money if EGAT remains a state utility. Retaining the status quo would
only burden taxpayers and increase the public debt, their argument goes.
But up against that are the counter-arguments. Critics say that consumers
will be hit when the price of electricity goes up, that the new company
will be a monopoly in the hands of private owners and that select people
connected to the government will be able to gobble up the lucrative
EGAT shares.
There is no independent regulatory body in place to check on this
EGAT deal, Chuenchom Sangarasri Greacen, an energy researcher,
pointed out during an interview. A regulatory body is important
to monitor possible manipulation of share prices and other abuses that
can take place.
Attempts by the government to project itself as an appropriate alternative
to an independent regulator are unacceptable, she said, because
we cannot trust the government.
Such suspicion arises from the backroom deals that enabled a few people
with close links to the government to buy up large amounts of shares
when another state-owned utility, the Petroleum Authority, was privatized
earlier. Further objections to privatization range from the fate of
the hydroelectric power plants currently under EGAT -- which if privatized
would go to the new company that would now have the power to control
water in the dams and its having the power to infringe on private
property to pursue its work.
The government has been forced on the defensive due to the show
of strength by the EGAT union and the arguments against privatization,
a foreign labor rights activist who spoke on condition of anonymity
told IPS. There appears no way out at the moment.
The governments attempt to isolate the unions has thus far failed,
he added. Unless the government offers a deal, I dont think
the unions will stop their campaign. They are well organized and determined
to stand their ground.
Darfur, worlds greatest
humanitarian disaster -- UN official
Nairobi, Kenya, Mar. 22-- The war-torn Darfur region of western
Sudan is the worlds greatest humanitarian crisis,
comparable to the Rwandan genocide of 1994 in terms of human rights
abuses, according to a top UN official.
Mukesh Kapila, the UN Humanitarian Coordinator for Sudan, told reporters
in Nairobi that the vicious war in Darfur had led to violations
on a scale that was comparable in character to the Rwandan situation.
The only difference between Rwanda and Darfur now is the numbers
involved, he said.
The pattern of organized attacks on civilians and villages, abductions,
killings and organized rapes by militias was getting worse by the day,
he said, and could deteriorate even further. One can see how the
situation might develop without prompt [action]...all the warning signs
are there.
I think some people are using the term ethnic cleansing and I
would say that is not far off the mark, he added. I think
the term is being used by certain people because its one group
of people organizing themselves to do away with another group of people,
and thats a definition of ethnic cleansing.
Kapila added that the systematic depopulation of the Darfur region resembled
a scorched earth policy. This is more than just a conflict, it
is an organized attempt to do away with a group of people.
In an attack on Feb. 27 in the Tawilah area of northern Darfur, 30 villages
were burned to the ground, over 200 people killed and over 200 girls
and women raped -- some by up to 14 assailants and in front of their
fathers who were later killed. A further 150 women and 200 children
were abducted.
Since a rebellion in the region emerged in February 2004, about 700,000
people have been displaced while another 110,000 have fled to neighboring
Chad. Over 10,000 are estimated to have lost their lives.
For the last six weeks the refugees in Chad have been attacked almost
daily by militias, known as Janjawid, who cross the porous border to
steal their cattle. Within Darfur the Janjawid regularly steal humanitarian
aid given to displaced people.
About three thousand Darfurians, mostly women and children, who managed
to escape to Khartoum were subjected to shooting and tear gas by riot
police two days ago. By Thursday, the 3,000 had disappeared
from the camp they were staying at on the outskirts of the city, forced
to flee once again.
Kapila urged UN member states to exert pressure to bring the perpetrators
of the crimes in Darfur to justice. The Member states of the UN
should be heavily engaged in not only seeking political settlement in
Darfur but also exerting pressure to bring justice. What is going on
in Darfur today is tantamount to war crimes.
Those who are doing these sorts of things should be brought to
justice....Sooner or later it is not just bringing the war to an end
in Darfur that is required, but also bringing justice and redress for
the victims.
The government of Sudan has admitted arming Arab militias to fight the
regions two rebel movements, who are using the opportunity to
get rich by stealing cattle and taking over the regions grazing
lands and scarce water sources from the Fur, Massalit and Zaghawa ethnic
groups.
Meanwhile the militias, some of whom wear army uniforms, are reportedly
being assisted by the army and paramilitary units known as the Popular
Defense Forces.
Just this week Amnesty International said this is not a situation
where the central government has lost control. Men, women and children
are being killed and villages are burnt and looted because the central
government is allowing militias aligned to it to pursue what amounts
to a strategy of forced displacement through the destruction of homes
and livelihood of the farming populations of the region.
AI said it had received information indicating that the Sudan
government is encouraging the actions of the Janjawid.
Kapila warned that the Darfur situation threatens a Sudanese peace deal
between the government and the Sudan Peoples Liberation Movement/Army,
who are currently negotiating in Kenya. How can a new settlement
be found when a huge region of the country is up in flames? he
asked.
Source: UN Integrated Regional Information
Networks
Violence still plagues Haiti one month
after the ousting of Aristide
Compiled by John Lapp
March 31 (AGR) Nearly one month after ousted president
Jean-Bertrand Aristide was forced to flee Haiti under amid a suspicious
coup , many of his followers say theyre still being harassed,
threatened, and killed. This week, the bodies of five people who backed
Aristide were found dumped in the capital -- some said as part of a
brutal crackdown against those faithful to the fallen leader.
Among them was Joel Lafrance, 21, whose mother said she would like to
remember him as the shy, handsome young man he was, not the morgue photographs
of his blood-splattered corpse, wrists bound with steel wire. His
face was completely ripped apart. I was only able to recognize him from
a birthmark on his foot, said Marie Carmelle Saint-Hilaire in
the teeming La Salines slum.
Five police officers are being held on suspicion of killing Lafrance
and the four other slain Aristide supporters, though no charges have
been filed, said the National Coalition for Haitian Rights.
Meanwhile, residents of La Salines, a traditional Aristide stronghold
and home to about 40,000 people, are hoping they can halt future violence
by cooperating with authorities. On Saturday, they turned over about
200 weapons -- mostly old and rusted rifles and pistols -- to French
troops and local police as a peace gesture. But just a few meters away,
three women broke into song, swaying their arms in the air and stomping
as they sang: Five more years for Aristide and Aristides
blood is our blood.
During a Friday funeral procession for the five slain men, several police
officers opened fire on mourners, injuring five, according to Sonia
Nozan, a 31-year-old community leader. The incident could not be confirmed.
These attacks come as Haitis new US-backed government wages its
own score-settling with the old regime, announcing Friday it will block
dozens of former Aristide officials from leaving the country. Those
barred from leaving Haiti include former Prime Minister Yvon Neptune,
ex-police chief Jocelyne Pierre, and the former head of the Central
Bank Venel Joseph.
New Justice Minister Bernard Gousse told Associated Press the move was
an insurance policy that will make sure the officials are
available for investigations into embezzlement and other alleged crimes.
Some Caribbean leaders said they were angery with Latortue, who was
not invited to the summit, because he was allowing rebels who include
convicted assassins to walk free.
CARRICOM denies recognition to new government
The 15-nation Caribbean Community (CARRICOM) withheld recognition from
Haitis US-backed interim government Saturday as leaders closed
a summit renewing calls for a United Nations (UN) investigation into
the ouster of President Jean-Bertrand Aristide. Leaders said they would
take up the issue of whether to recognize the government again at a
summit in July in Grenada the carribian island of Grenada.
Several officials said the regional bloc was under enormous US pressure
to recognize the new government, which was appointed after Aristide
was forced to leave on Feb. 29 amid a popular uprising. The leaders
also lamented recent statements by Haitis Prime Minister Gerard
Latortue hailing rebels as freedom fighters and saying he
was freezing participation in the regional bloc for its stance in bringing
Aristide to Jamaica for temporary exile.
The participating Caribbean leaders issued a statement early Saturday
saying no action should be taken to legitimize the rebel forces.
They said while Haiti remains a welcome partner in the Caribbean
Community, there has been an interruption of the democratic process.
We do not give comfort to thugs and rebels, said Ralph Gonsalves,
the prime minister of St Vincent and the Grenadines. What we have
done is to recognize a state, but we do not recognize governments and
interim administrations.
The leaders said they would ask the UN General Assembly or Secretary-General
Kofi Annan to oversee an investigation into Aristides claims he
was abducted at gunpoint by US agents when he left Feb. 29 as rebels
threatened to attack Haitis capital. Delegates said the bloc wants
the General Assembly to investigate Aristides departure rather
than the Security Council, where the United States or France could veto
the proposal.
US officials claim they organized his departure on a charter to Central
African Republic at his own request and probably saved his life.
US threatens Jamaica over Aristides stay
Randall Robinson, author and founder of Tran Africa; is a close friend
of Aristede and was on the delegation that returned the ousted president
to the Caribbean. Robinson revealed on Amy Goodmans Democracy
Now! radio program that Security Adviser Condoleeza Rice is telling
the Jamaican government that if Aristide is not immediately expelled
from the country and if anything happens to American forces in Haiti,
consequences would be exacted against Jamaica in full force by the US.
Aristide is currently staying in Jamaica to visit his family and is
deciding where to take up permanent residence. He has not decided whether
to accept permanent asylum in South Africa, his spokesman said yesterday,
denying reports an asylum deal had been reached.
US State Deaprtment accuses Aristide of drug trafficking
Concern over the Aristide governments involvement in illegal drugs
trafficking has been cited as one of the main reasons why the US was
keen to see the Haitian leader leave.
The annual US State Department report assessing the cooperation of foreign
governments in the war against drug trafficking, published on Mar. 1,
strongly criticizes the Aristide government.
Launching the report, a top State Department narcotics official said
some members of the Aristide government had links to the drug trade.
The state department report quotes frequent allegations that members
of the government and the Haiti National Police, most notably the Presidential
Security Unit and the Palace Guard, were actively involved in drug trafficking.
Another recent US Narcotics Control Report said about eight percent
of illegal drugs entering the United States had passed through Haiti.
Aristide supporters deny this claim and in turn accuse the rebel forces
of being backed by drug money.
The military regime which overthrew Aristide in September 1991 was reported
to be in the pay of Colombian drugs cartel bosses, with the head of
police Michel Francois allegedly controlling the trade.
One of the rebel leaders, Guy Philippe, had his US visa revoked because
of involvement in the drugs trade when he was police commissioner of
the north coast city of Cap-Haitian, and was indited for leading a death
squad. Another prominent rebel, Jodel Chamblain, is known to have been
close to drug lords in the early 1990s, when he was one of the leaders
of the Front for the Advancement of Progress of the Haitian People (FRAPH)
paramilitaries.
Chamblain vows to kill Aristide
Jodel Chamblain, a former army officer convicted of murder, said in
an interview late Saturday at a plush, well-guarded hilltop retreat
just outside Port-au-Prince that he sees himself as a patriotic leader
of the Haitian people on a mission to stamp out Aristides following.
Chamblain, who returned from a decade in exile in neighboring Dominican
Republic to lead last months uprising, accuses Aristide of ordering
thugs to murder his seven-months pregnant wife in 1991 and vows he will
never let another like him lead Haiti.
Chamblain is suspected of taking part in a 1987 election massacre in
which 34 voters were killed. He was convicted in 1995 in absentia of
the 1993 murder of a prominent pro-Aristide businessman who was dragged
out of a church service and shot in the head.
The now defunct FRAPH paramilitary he co-founded in 1993 was blamed
for 3,000 of the estimated 5,000 killings in the three years after a
military junta ousted Aristide in 1991.
Chamblain and rebels in control of swaths of Haitis rural north
are able to move around unhindered by a UN-backed multinational military
force and local police.
Sources: AP, BBC NEWS, Reuters, Democracy
Now!, Nigerian Guardian
Afghanistan puts elections on hold
By Nilima Fox
Mar. 29 President Hamid Karzai postponed Afghanistans
first post-Taliban national elections until September yesterday because
the United Nations urged more time was needed to disarm warlords that
it called a leading threat to democracy.
UN leaders had warned a delay of the vote may be necessary because officials,
security forces, and candidates were ill-prepared to register up to
10.5 million eligible Afghans in time for June elections.
Delaying the vote means Afghanistan can run the presidential and the
parliamentary elections simultaneously, President Karzai said. We
wanted to have both elections together, he added. Thats
also the desire of the people.
Jean Arnault, the UN special representative to Afghanistan, welcomed
the decision, saying it would allow Nato to expand its peacekeeping
operations beyond Kabul. Arnault called on the Afghan government to
guarantee a level playing field for challengers to President Karzai
and a rash of new political parties. He said, these elections
will be free and fair depends on what happens between now and September.
So far, the UN has registered only 1.6 million eligible voters, all
of them in urban centers. It remains unclear how UN workers plan to
execute a planned May push to give a further eight million a chance
to sign up, especially in remote provinces, where President Karzais
government holds little sway and fears of violence are high.
The Afghan government said it will disarm 40,000 irregular Afghan militia
soldiers and round up heavy weapons in time for the vote to reduce the
risk of voter intimidation. More than 200 people have died in violence
around the country this year.
But the UN, the US-led military coalition, and the Afghan government
are still working on plans to protect election workers from Taliban-led
militants plaguing the south and east.
Hamid Agha, a Taliban spokesman, said the delay was a humiliation
and defeat for President Karzai and his US backers and claimed
the elections would be fixed. They want to divert the attention
of Afghans from the importance of jihad, he siad.
Source: Independent (UK)
Congolese troops snuff out coup attempt
By Nilima Fox
Mar. 29 Kinshasa, the Congolese capital, awoke to gunfire
yesterday when forces loyal to Mobutu Sese Seko, the former dictator,
launched a coup attempt against the government of President Joseph Kabila.
Government forces took on the attackers at military installations and
television headquarters across the capital, and arrested 15 men. Many
of the attackers were dressed in civilian clothes and sporadic gunfire
continued into the night, diplomatic sources said.
Theophile Mbemba Fundu, the Interior Minister, said: It was an attack
by armed military personnel seeking to undermine the internal security
of the Congolese state.
It was the first major threat to a year-old power-sharing government which
is trying to unify Africas third-largest nation after a five-year-old
war that is conservatively estimated to have killed some three million
people. Fighters loyal to the Democratic Republic of Congos (DRC)
recent dictator were among those behind the attempt, said Jim Atkinson,
the British ambassador to Kinshasa.
The coup attempt began in the morning and lasted for four hours; by noon,
it was apparently contained by loyalist troops. Kabila was believed to
be out of the city yesterday, but his whereabouts were still unclear.
Atkinson insisted: I have it on good authority that hes safe.
The simultaneous pre-dawn attacks targeted an army camp near Kabilas
offices, a military airport, a naval shipyard on the Congo River, and
the national radio and television headquarters. Vital Kamerhe, the government
spokesman, said that untold numbers of the civilian-clothed attackers
disappeared into the city with their weapons. He said the battle killed
one Congo soldier and injured two others.
Kamerhe refused to comment on the diplomats accounts of the attack,
which they said was linked to the recent discovery of an arms cache buried
in Kinshasa. We have the situation under control, Kamerhe
said after the fighting subsided.
Congo officials said the attempt did not harm a government of national
unity aiming to move Congo beyond its ruinous 1998-2003 war, which saw
foreign-backed rebels take control of the east and much of the north.
Mbemba Fundu said: This event will not destabilize the government.
Everybodys still working together.
Diplomats believed the attempt was the work of soldiers loyal to Mobutu,
Congos three-decade ruler. Thousands of Mobutu soldiers fled across
the river Congo to Brazzaville, the capital of the neighboring Republic
of Congo, after the ousting in 1997 of Mobutu, who died of prostate cancer
in September 1997, while in exile in Morocco.
Atkinson said: Theyve infiltrated into Kinshasa with weapons,
presumably over the past days and weeks. This morning they began attacking
at various places.
Shooting was heard around Kinshasas Congo river port, directly across
from Brazzaville. A Congo army officer, speaking on condition of anonymity,
said some of the attackers had come from Brazzaville overnight, passing
a security post where soldiers were asleep on duty.
Kabila has been in power since January 2001, when bodyguards assassinated
then-ruler Laurent Kabila, Josephs father. The United Nations has
some 10,800 peacekeepers in the DRC, helping the transitional government
regain control of its territory and prepare for elections in less than
two years.
Source: Independent (UK)
Chiracs PM faces the sack after
voters
turn against center-right
By John Lichfield
Paris, France, Mar. 29 President Jacques Chiracs center-right
party suffered a catastrophic defeat in the second round of the French
regional elections yesterday, increasing the pressure on him to sack his
prime minister, Jean-Pierre Raffarin.
Less than two years after they painted the map blue in parliamentary elections,
French voters painted France red from north to south and east to west.
The socialist-led center-left humiliated by voters in 2002, looked likely
to capture 20 of the 22 regions in mainland France.
Only Alsace and, possibly, Corsica, stood against the red and green tide
as French voters turned out in large numbers to reject Chiracs and
Raffarins policies of moderate economic and social reform.
Defeat for the government was expected after poor results in the first
round of the elections last week, but no one had forecast a calamity on
this scale. The center-left - Socialists, Communists and Greens -
took 49.8 percent of the vote nationwide. The center-right scored 37 per
cent. The far-right National Front, not able to stand in all regions,
took 13.2 per cent.
The center-left controlled seven regions before yesterdays vote.
They seemed certain to capture 20 of the 22 regions in mainland France
as well as the four regions in French overseas departments. Corsica, which
has slightly different voting rules, was teetering between right and left.
Laurent Fabius, the former Socialist prime minister, said that it was
a very, very spectacular result which punishes the government for
ruling on behalf of a clan.
Raffarin, whose popularity stood at record levels only 12 months ago,
suffered from the resurgence of unemployment but mostly from the perversity,
skittishness and reform-phobia of a French electorate which has alternately
punished left and right at roughly two-yearly intervals for the past 15
years.
The relatively modest reforms attempted by Raffarin - of the pension
and education and unemployment pay systems, with health policy still to
come - have raised deep fears that the French model of
social protection is being dismantled.
François Fillon, the Social Affairs Minister, said: This
is an extremely serious defeat which raises a grave question. The left
suffered a similarly total rejection only 20 months ago. In such circumstances,
how can any government carry out the program of reforms needed to allow
France to keep up with a changing world?
Whether or not he decides to sack Raffarin, Chirac faces a doleful second
half of his second term as president. Although the results of the regional
elections have no direct impact on the center-rights large majority
in parliament, the resurgence of the left will make it risky for the government
to push through the remainder of its reform program.
A large government reshuffle is inevitable. If Chirac decides to sack
Raffarin - brought from obscurity as a man of the people
two years ago - he faces an agonizing decision on who should be the
next prime minister.
The obvious choice would be the popular Interior Minister, Nicolas Sarkozy,
but this might bolster his position as a challenger to the Presidents
hopes of winning a third term in the Elysées Palace in 2007.
Source: Independent (UK)
|