|
Pressure on Cheney over smears, outing
of CIA wife
By Andrew Buncombe
Washington, DC, May 2 Vice-President Dick Cheney was under
mounting pressure last night after he and his senior officials were
accused of smearing a former ambassador and outing his wife as an undercover
CIA officer in a deliberate act of revenge hatched inside the White
House.
In a row which began with off-the-record comments he made to The Independent
on Sunday last year, a former diplomat, Joe Wilson, said Cheney oversaw
a group of neo-conservatives who decided to try to damage his reputation.
Because of Wilson, the White House was forced to admit that a key claim
in President Bushs 2003 State of the Union address that
Iraq was seeking uranium for nuclear weapons - should not have been
made.
The controversy over what happened next could prove to be the most damaging
yet to engulf the Bush administration. A criminal inquiry is investigating
the unveiling in the press of Wilsons wife, Valerie Plame, as
a CIA agent -- a serious felony under US law. If one of Cheneys
senior officials were charged, the damage would be huge.
Should the vice-president be personally implicated which Wilson
believes he is the outcome would be devastating for both Cheney
and Bush as they campaign for re-election.
Wilson has made his allegations in a newly published book, The Politics
of Truth, subtitled Inside the lies that led to war and betrayed
my wifes CIA identity. In it he writes: I am told
... that the office of the vice-president either the vice-president
himself or more likely his chief of staff, Lewis Scooter
Libby chaired a meeting at which a decision was made to do a
work-up on me. As I understand it, this meant they were going to take
a close look at who I was and what my agenda might be.
The former diplomat has claimed elsewhere that it was also at this meeting
that the issue of his wifes identity and her role as a covert
CIA operative was discussed. Wilson said he believed it was very unlikely
that Cheney was not aware of this.
In an exclusive interview in his office in Washington, just a quarter
of a mile from Cheneys, he said: I find it difficult to
believe that a chief of staff would be undertaking something like this
without at a minimum the vice-presidents knowledge.
Wilson stopped short of asking for Cheneys resignation, but said:
If he [did not know] about it, he should be saying so. The leak
took place at the nexus of national security, policy and politics.
His struggle with the White House dates to a mission in early 2002,
at the request of Cheneys office. He was sent to the west African
state of Niger, where he was once ambassador, to investigate claims
that Iraq was seeking to purchase uranium to develop nuclear weapons.
The claims were based on a document obtained by Italian intelligence
services, which had passed the information to Washington.
In less than a week, Wilson proved that the claim was false and that
the document must be a fake. Returning to Washington, he reported this
to a debriefer from the CIA. Later, experts from the UN nuclear watchdog,
the International Atomic Energy Agency, confirmed the document was a
crude forgery.
But when Bush and his senior officials continued to make the claim
first publicized in the British Governments September 2002 dossier
on Iraq he felt it was his duty to speak out. In an interview
with The Independent on Sunday, in which he asked that he not be identified,
and subsequently in a signed piece in The New York Times, Wilson pointed
out that it was inconceivable that senior US and British officials were
not aware of his findings.
After he went public, his wife was identified as a CIA operative by
the syndicated right-wing columnist Bob Novak, a veteran Washington
journalist with close links to the Republicans. It was her suggestion
to send Wilson to Africa, claimed Novak, who said in his column he had
been provided with the information by two senior administration
officials.
The leaking of an intelligence officers identity is a criminal
offense. An FBI team is investigating the leak and has called a grand
jury to hear evidence and question potential witnesses. Earlier this
year it was reported that Libby and numerous other officials from Cheneys
office had been questioned by the FBI. Wilson alleges that it was Bushs
senior political adviser, Karl Rove, who was responsible for pushing
the story of Plames CIA position, and that a senior national security
council official, Elliott Abra, may also have been involved.
The White House has been very careful in its remarks on the affair,
insisting that Rove, Elliott and Libby were not involved in leaking
classified information. It has stopped short of an outright denial.
One reason the White House may have been keen to smear Wilson is because
it knew his allegations would be taken seriously. In the run-up to the
first Gulf War he helped to secure the release of US citizens taken
hostage by Saddam Hussein. He was the last US official to meet Saddam
while he was in power.
Wilson told the IOS that his wife still worked for the CIA, but that
her work had been severely disrupted. He said that she might also be
at risk from anyone who wished to harm her because of her previous undercover
work.
It has been irredeemably changed, he said, adding that his
wife felt she had been a victim of the political ambitions of senior
officials within the administration.
Source: Independent (UK)
White supremacist leader found guilty
of murder solicitation
Compiled by Shawn Gaynor
May 4 (AGR) White supremacist leader Matthew Hale, whose
gospel of racial holy war was linked to a followers
deadly shooting rampage five years ago, was found guilty Apr. 26 of
trying to have a federal judge killed.
Hale was convicted on three charges of obstructing justice and one count
of soliciting the murder of U.S. District Judge Joan Humphrey Lefkow,
a federal judge, who ruled against him in a trademark case.
He was acquitted of a second count of soliciting the murder of a federal
judge.
Hale never testified during the two-week trial, and chief defense counsel
Thomas Anthony Durkin called no witnesses, saying the prosecutions
evidence was the weakest he had seen in a major case.
The defense argued that Hale never asked anyone to kill the judge and
that the FBI used an informant to draw him into a murder plot.
In the trial, prosecutors focused on one tape of a brief, veiled exchange
recorded Dec. 17, 2002, when FBI informant Anthony Evola, posing as
a follower, showed up unannounced at Hales East Peoria home. Lefkow
had issued her order a month earlier.
Are we gonna exterminate the rat? Evola can be heard asking
Hale on the tape, which Evola testified meant Lefkow.
Well, whatever you want to do, basically, Hale replied.
Moments later, Hale added: My position has always been that, you
know, Im going to fight within the law and, but, ah, that informations
been provided if you wish to, ah, do anything, yourself, you can. So
that makes it clear.
Consider it done, Evola said.
During the trial, jurors heard more than a dozen tapes of Hale using
racial slurs, including one in which he laughs about the 1999 shooting
rampage by one of his followers, Benjamin Smith. Smith targeted minorities
and killed two people, including former Northwestern University basketball
coach Ricky Byrdsong.
Ben Smith, a former member of Hales group, traveled in Illinois
and Indiana shooting blacks, Asians and Jews during the 1999 Independence
Day weekend. Smith killed two people and wounded nine others before
killing himself.
The jury found Hale, 32, had solicited Anthony Evola, his security chief,
to kill Lefkow because she had ruled against his organization, the former
World Church of the Creator, in a trademark infringement lawsuit. But
the jurors acquitted Hale of charges alleging he solicited Jon Fox,
a former member of the World Church, to kill Lefkow.
The obstructing justice counts state Hale obstructed justice when he
solicited Lefkows murder, when he sent her a letter falsely claiming
he did not possess materials bearing the trademarked terms Church
of the Creator and when he instructed his father on what to say
when testifying before a federal grand jury.
U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald said during a news conference Todays
message is that we will not wait for the trigger to be pulled,
he added.
Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weisman said he believed jurors saw that
Hale knew much about the law and was being careful not to step over
the line, which shows he meant it when he wanted a federal judge killed.
As for possible retaliation by Hales followers following the verdict,
Fitzgerald responded, We will take action should anyone try to
do anything violent.
Sherialyn Byrdsong, widow of Northwestern University basketball coach
Ricky Byrdsong, who was killed during Smiths 1999 rampage, released
a statement on behalf of the foundation named after her late husband:
We are thrilled about the verdict in the case against Matthew
Hale. We are all human beings, created in Gods image, placed together
on this planet to love, respect and esteem one another. I hope that
the lesson and message of this trial is that peaceful co-existence should
be all of our goals.
Hale, who renamed his organization the Creativity Movement, has been
held at the Metropolitan Correctional Center since his January 2003
arrest.
Hales group follows the The White Mans Bible,
written by the groups founder decades ago, which prosecutors say
preaches racial holy war and urges followers to take the
law into their own hands if the government intervenes. Hale often shortened
racial holy war to RAHOWA in signing off letters
to followers.
Those followers have largely scattered since Hales arrest 15 months
ago. Under an order issued by Lefkow, any members of the group who can
be identified will be held responsible for a $200,000 fine for flouting
her order to stop using the name World Church of the Creator.
No sentencing date has been set in Hales case. Solicitation of
murder carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison. Hale could also
get a maximum of 10 years on each of three counts of obstruction of
justice.
Federal prosecutors in Chicago say the conviction in white supremacist
Matthew Hales murder-solicitation trial sends an important message.
Just a few days after Matt Hales conviction, the FBI says its
keeping a closer eye on hate groups that communicate on the Internet.
Agents tracking the groups say theyre just making sure the fine
line between free speech and inciting violence isnt crossed.
Monitoring the Internet is nothing new for law enforcement who insist
its all in an effort to stop violence before it starts.
Sources: AP, ABC, NBC
ACLU discloses documents in challenge
to PATRIOT Act
New York, New York, Apr. 28-- The American Civil
Liberties Union and New York Civil Liberties Union today disclosed
documents in an extraordinary sealed case in federal court involving
the PATRIOT Acts expanded National Security Letter
power. The ACLU lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of a provision
that allows the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to demand sensitive
customer records from businesses without judicial oversight.
The ACLU said it was forced to file the lawsuit about the National
Security Letter power under seal to avoid penalties for violating
a strict gag provision, which it is also challenging on First Amendment
grounds. The case was filed in the Southern District of New York on
Apr. 6.
It took nearly three weeks to reach an agreement with the government
that allowed the ACLU to disclose anything about the case without
fear of penalty. Certain details about the lawsuit remain under seal.
The National Security Letter provision allows the FBI to demand
the sensitive records of innocent people in complete secrecy, without
ever appearing before a federal judge, said Jameel Jaffer, an
ACLU staff attorney.
Before the PATRIOT Act, the FBI could use this invasive authority
only against suspected terrorists and spies, Jaffer said. Now
it can issue National Security Letters to obtain information about
anyone at all. This should be disturbing to all of us.
The fact that the government agreed only under pressure to allow disclosure
of parts of the legal complaint, the ACLU said, demonstrates that
the gag order is unnecessarily broad and restrictive.
It is remarkable that a gag provision in the PATRIOT Act kept
the public in the dark about the mere fact that a constitutional challenge
had been filed in court, said Ann Beeson, ACLU Associate Legal
Director. President Bush can talk about extending the life of
the PATRIOT Act, but the ACLU is still gagged from discussing details
of our challenge to it.
In legal papers, the ACLU argues that the National Security Letter
provision violates the First and Fourth Amendments because it authorizes
the FBI to force disclosure of sensitive information without adequate
safeguards. The FBI can issue a National Security Letter without obtaining
prior judicial approval, without demonstrating a compelling need to
justify the disclosure, and without specifying any mechanism that
would allow a recipient to contest the demand.
The lack of such safeguards, the ACLU said, allows the government
to unmask anonymous speakers, violating a tradition of anonymous speech
that goes back to the Federalist Papers. Protecting this right is
especially critical given the large number of Internet users who use
pseudonyms to engage in legitimate political speech.
The ACLU first obtained information about the use of National Security
Letters last March through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Information
about that lawsuit, including some of the records the ACLU obtained
from the FBI, are posted at www.aclu.org/patriotfoia.
The ACLU has led opposition to controversial portions of the PATRIOT
Act, filing a challenge to Section 215, another provision that allows
the FBI to gain access to sensitive records, and filing briefs before
the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to oppose expanded
wiretaps. With support from a broad right-left coalition, the ACLU
has also encouraged passage of approximately 300 local resolutions
against anti-civil liberties portions of the law, and has urged Congress
to leave in place the sunsets for PATRIOT Act provisions
set to expire in 2005.
The defendants in the NSL lawsuit include Attorney General John Ashcroft
and FBI Director Robert Mueller. The case is assigned to Judge Victor
Marrero.
Source: American Civil Liberties Union
|