No. 295, Sept. 9 - 15, 2004

SECCIÓN EN ESPAÑOL

CULTURE



To read an article, click on the headline.

Learning anarchy: radical books for kids

"As ye sow, so shall ye reap"

Billionaires for Bush





Learning anarchy: radical books for kids

By Egg Syntax and Radym

We’re certain that most anarchists can remember at least one book that first introduced them to anti-authoritarianism, political engagement, gender-role-bending, or other topics of lasting importance. But such books are hard to find amid the morass of boring, mainstream kid-lit that reinforces the same capitalist and authoritarian values which are fed to adults (can you say “Disney”?). Here, then, we present a highly subjective and idiosyncratic guide to some of the best work out there. Undoubtedly, we’ve left off your favorite author; we’re sorry, and we meant to check with you before we wrote this, but there are thousands of great children’s books out there, and our guide could easily have taken up the whole of this issue if we’d let it. Our selection is ordered, loosely, by age of target reader.

Willis, Jeanne. I want to be a Cowgirl. Illustrated by Tony Ross. Henry Hold and Company, 2001. Leave the city. Throw down that tea set. Fight back against the education system. Dump your penthouse upbringing. Forget cooking and cleaning and become a cowgirl. What’s so wrong with that?

Cronin, Doreen. Click, Clack, Moo: Cows That Type. Illustrated by Betsy Lewin. Simon and Schuster, 2000. With factory farms and worsening conditions for farm animals world-wide, it’s only a matter of time before the animals start fighting back. Actually, the wait is over. In Cronin’s genius children’s book Click, Clack, Moo, the animals fight back against the oppressive farmer by going on strike.

Gosney, Joy. Naughty Parents. Millbrook Press, 1999. While I don’t know if the author meant the book to be explicitly political, it’s anarchist in the way it portrays two parents as free souls. In Naughty Parents, a young girl must keep a sharp eye on her parents as they make their way through puddles, down slides, and more.

McMullan, Kate. I Stink! Illustrated by Jim McMullan. Joanna Cotler Books, 2002. Well, if you haven’t told your little one lately about how important garbage trucks and the people who pick up your garbage are, then you better pick up this book. From dirty diapers to rotten radishes, your local garbage workers are doing the under-appreciated (and stinky) job that very few people want from dusk ‘til dawn.

Sheldon Epstein, Vivian. The ABCs of What a Girl Can Be. VSE Publisher, 1980. If you knew the ABCs of what a girl can be, you’d have just a small idea of the possibilities! This is a very cute book, with retro drawings and the wildest ideas of what a person can be when they grow up (P is for Parachutist). This is a great book to show your children what they’re not learning in school -– that girls kick ass!

Yarbrough, Camille. Cornrows. Illustrated by Carole Byard. Coward-McCann, Inc., 1979. This Coretta Scott King Award winner tells the story of hair in Africa and for African-Americans during slavery and to the present day through the stories of Mama and Great-grammaw. Together, they teach Sister and Brother (aka MeToo) about the power of pride and cornrows... from Robeson to Malcolm, from Richard Wright to Langston Hughes, from Mary Bethune to Aretha.

hooks, bell. Happy to be Nappy. Illustrated by Chris Raschka. Hyperion Books for Children, 1999. This is hooks’ first children’s book, and it makes the reader shiver with excitement. Children will love this book not only for its words, but for Raschka’s beautiful illustrations.

Baylor, Byrd. The Table Where Rich People Sit. Illustrated by Perter Parnall. Scribner’s Sons, 1994. Like all of the beautifully-illustrated collaborations between Baylor and Parnall, this story teaches the value of the natural world. Unlike others, though, this one is explicit about the relative value of money and freedom, suggesting that money “shouldn’t even be on a list of our kind of riches.”

Silverstein, Shel. Lafcadio the Lion. HarperCollins, 1963. Lafcadio is a lion raised as a human. He learns to be a sharpshooter and eventually goes on a hunting expedition and encounters his lion kin. Forced to choose between the lions and the hunters, he puts down his gun and walks away to forge his own path.

Lindgren, Astrid. Pippi Longstocking. Viking Penguin, 1950. This indispensable inspiration for young anti-authoritarians features Pippi, age nine, who lives without adults and does whatever she likes because “in the whole wide world there was not a single police officer as strong as she.”

Dahl, Roald. Danny, the Champion of the World. Knopf, 1975. A charming, less-well-known work by Dahl about a boy who lives with his father in a gypsy caravan and learns to poach pheasants. Includes a lucid, class-based defense of poaching.

Gaiman, Neil. Coraline. HarperTrophy, 2003. While Gaiman’s charmingly scary children’s book is not explicity political, his protagonist’s survival depends on her unwillingness to trust self-proclaimed authority figures and her trust in her own intuition and agenda.

Pinkwater, D. Manus. Lizard Music. Yearling, 1976. In quintessential Pinkwater style, Lizard Music skewers cultural sacred cows left and right. The protagonist finds himself embroiled in marvelous adventures by rejecting all received truth in order to think for himself.

Bartoletti, Susan Campbell. Kids on Strike! Houghton Mifflin, 1999. A history of labor conditions and labor resistance a century ago. Both an excellent introduction to labor issues and movement and a paean to the possibility of political engagement by young people. Includes wonderful photos as well.

Tolan, Stephanie S. Welcome to the Ark. Morrow Junior Books, 1996. The first in a trilogy following four kids who are involuntarily committed to a youth “rehabilitation” center because of their inability to fit into or accept society. This book poignantly portrays, among many other things, the abuse of power in the mental health system, the importance of communication with the land and the devaluing of kids in our society.

Allende, Isabel. City of the Beasts. HarperCollins, 2002. A wonderfully written book for adolescents that denounces the rapacity of those who want to destroy the Amazon rain forest by exploiting its riches for profit, killing any of the Native population that interferes with their plans. Very funny at times, the book never preaches and the reader learns about the Native peoples and the problems they’re confronted with through the eyes of a 15 year old boy who unwillingly accompanies his eccentric photographer grandmother on a magazine expedition.

Llewellyn, Grace. The Teenage Liberation Handbook. Lowry House, 1991. Very possibly the most radical book on this list, this fiery guide encourages kids to really think for themselves, drop out of school, and start making their own decisions once and for all.

Some material we omitted includes: Dr. Seuss (our hero!), Lewis Carroll (our other hero!), James Loewen’s The Truth About Columbus, and the now tragically out-of-print Suzuki Bean and Radical Red.

Source: The Fifth Estate

"As ye sow, so shall ye reap"

On the Justice of Roosting Chickens: Reflections on the Consequences of US Imperial Arrogance and Criminality
by Ward Churchill
AK Press

Review by Faith Attaguile

On the matter of 9/11, Ward Churchill takes no prisoners. “As ye sow, so shall ye reap” is the message urgently advanced in On the Justice of Roosting Chicken’s first section, “The Ghosts of 9-1-1.” The rest of the book effectively jams the same message into the reader’s consciousness, although in a very different way. In the end, he fully exposes – in all its “imperial arrogance and criminality” – the thieving, murderous hulk lurking behind 225 years of American “law-abiding” pretensions. No one is absolved from responsibility for ending these crimes.

In the next section, “That Most Peace-Loving of Nations,” Churchill offers a year-by-year chronology of military violence and borders from 1776 to 2003. Even though Churchill describes it as an abridged list – “the barest tip of the American militarist iceberg” – it remains one of the most comprehensive narratives I’ve encountered. As a backdrop, Churchill quotes one Major General Smedley Butler:

“I spent 33 years and 4 months in active service as a member of our country’s most agile military force – the Marine Corps… And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street, and for bankers. In short, I was a racketeer for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect money in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street… In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I feel I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was operate in three city districts. We Marines operated on three continents.”

Any remaining illusions the reader may have about the legality of US activities will not survive the book’s third and final section, “A Government of Laws?” A chilling 172-page “chronology of criminal comportment” documents the true underpinning of US legalistic pretensions between 1945 and 2003 and exposes the lethal, mind-numbing efficiency with which the US has repeatedly violated international law in the past, and continues to do so in the present. Churchill writes:

“If, as US Defense Secretary Rumsfeld has observed, the world continues to be an exceedingly ‘rough neighborhood,’ it is mainly because he and his ilk have insisted – indeed guaranteed – for their own purposes that it be so. And this, notwithstanding the insufferably smug delusions afflicting the great and mostly mindless mass of ‘law-abiding Americans,’ is the signature characteristic of the variety of criminal enterprise commonly referred to as an ‘outlaw’ or ‘rogue’ state.”

He is uncompromising in his criticism of the seemingly unstoppable propensity of Americans across the political spectrum to dodge responsibility for the “hideous human costs” attending US actions around the world by claiming “innocence” or ignorance of the facts. Asserting that most Americans engage in “willful and deliberate ignoration,” Churchill writes that he “feels obliged to try and deny them of the option of such pretense.” In that respect, the book is a triumph.

Churchill asks which of us, left horrified in the wake of 9/11, stopped to consider how many US citizens would have had to die in order to achieve parity with the Iraqis dead from US-imposed sanctions after the first Gulf War. For those who haven’t (and that’s most of us), the figure, assuming a 15-to-1 US-to-Iraq population ratio – is 7.5 mission children and 22.5 million adults. This is mind-boggling in its implications. As Churchill notes, we’d run out of people long before we ran out of “compensatory obligation” if we were “forced to compensate proportionally and in lives for the damage… wrought upon other peoples over the past two centuries.”

“The Ghosts of 9-1-1” was originally published in a short form soon after 9/11, and caused quite a stir amongst some US leftists. Intent on seeing themselves and their loved ones as “innocents” in the wake of the attack, they flinched at Churchill’s description of the majority of those who died as “little Eichmanns.” But Churchill’s description of “little Eichmanns” as a “cadre of faceless bureaucrats and technical experts who had willingly (and profitably) harnessed themselves to the task of making the United State’s genocidal world order hum with maximal efficiency” is certainly an apt parallel. Eichmann was a mere mid-level officer in the SS, by all accounts a good husband and devoted father, apparently quite mild-mannered, and never accused of having personally murdered anyone at all. His crime was to have sat at several steps removed from the holocaustal blood and gore, behind a desk, in the sterility of an office building, organizing the logistics — train and “cargo” schedules, mainly — without which the “industrial killing” aspect of the Nazi Judeocide could not have occurred. His most striking characteristic, if it may be called that, was his sheer “unexceptionality.”

Although it is easy to see why many of us might wish to define ourselves as out of this category, the fact remains that in the eyes of the world, today’s Good Americans are ultimately just as responsible for the state terror perpetrated in their name as were yesterday’s Good Germans. To those who counter Churchill’s argument with “we’re doing all we can,” he replies simply that it doesn’t matter if the crimes don’t end. If they don’t, and the US continues pushing the rest of the world around, don’t be surprised to find that the ones who finally push back aren’t “nice guys.” He continues, “whoever they might otherwise have been or become, the sheer and unrelenting brutality of the circumstances compelling their response is all but guaranteed to have twisted and deformed their outlooks in some truly hideous ways.”

Churchill is right. Until we take responsibility for terrorism perpetrated in our name, and until we end it, we can’t stop the terror returned. Indeed, the people who live in “the seething, bleeding psychic wastelands spawned by the unspeakable arrogance of US imperial pretension” will continue to feel the need to push back to the extent that people of the US -– all of us -– continue to wallow in delusions of innocence and exceptionalism. Standing as, in Churchill’s term, “moral witnesses” to these crimes is not enough.

To some, Churchill is a “howling, shocking nuisance.” But we desperately need people like him to shake us to our roots.

Source: LiP Magazine

Billionaires for Bush

By Rebecca Fox

On a breezy Saturday night in late May, New York’s youngest Billionaires were six-week-old twins dubbed “Cash” and “Carry.” They were proudly toted around by their mother and father, both in evening gowns, while other Billionaires, bedecked in their own ballroom finery, cooed over the infants in elevator lines on the three floors of Chelsea’s City Stage.

The occasion for the duo’s arrival — about 15 years ahead of schedule — was the Billionaires’ Ball: a Spring Bling K’Ching Thing, a night-long party put on by the street theater-cum-protest group Billionaires for Bush. “Founded during the 2000 Presidential election, Billionaires for Bush (B4B) was designed to be a strategic, grassroots media campaign that spreads like a virus” to denounce the negative effects of wealth on politics, according to the Billionaires’ online DIY guide to becoming a Billionaire, available at their web site (www.billionairesforbush.com).

Newly mobilized, strategically planned, and garnering more media attention than many of their more official and better-funded counterparts on the (anti-)campaign trail, “Billionaires for Bush is a do-it-yourself street theater and media campaign,” according to Pam Perd, the group’s National Director for Public Relations (who provided only her Billionaire identity, “for separation reasons”). Perd’s effort at separation seems to be in name alone, as she typically devotes 40 hours per week to the Billionaires on top of working full-time.

The creation of a Billionaire identity is but a preliminary step in casting oneself as a Billionaire. Billionaires for Bush’s Web site lists snarky names for acolytes to assume, and encourages them to emerge from “behind closed limo doors” to engage in an intensely media-savvy combination of protest, street theater, organization, and activism. Role-playing generalities may pepper the web site, but the DIY guide to becoming a Billionaire is 45 pages long and provides instructions for everything from developing a Billionaire personality (encouraging newbies to create “Your Persona & Portfolio”) to planning one’s own Billionaire actions (including the inside-out approach of “Counter-Demonstrating at Anti-Bush Events”).

The Billionaires bank upon the creativity of their membership to embrace their story-within-a-story approach to ousting Bush, inverting typical models of protest and demonstration by subversively appearing to support that which they wish to alter. Billionaire street actions are typically peaceable ones in which it’s not uncommon for actual Bush supporters, confused about the Billionaires’ real intentions, to append themselves to the group in a show of mistaken solidarity. According to Perd, the Billionaires’ collective straight face and singularity of focus is what keeps it so effective in “using a heaping spoonful of humor, savvy political messaging, grassroots participation, and the Internet to flush out the truth about how the Bush administration’s economic policies have been a disaster for most Americans.”

May’s Billionaires Ball raised money for the group’s summer “Swing State Limo Tour” and its upcoming actions, currently in the planning stage, in conjunction with the Republican National Convention’s arrival in New York City at the end of August.

Back in January, at B4B’s inaugural event — which was to kick off the presidential election year of actions, fundraising, and demonstrations — B4B had only two chapters and a Ball with 450 attendees; May’s event boasted approximately 1,100 guests while 50 new chapters have sprung up nationwide, according to Emily Wynns (a.k.a. “Lucinda Regulations”), Deputy Director of Public Relations.

Given the rapidly devolving situation in Iraq, when every passing day seems to provide anti-Bush activists with a new reason to rally to unseat him, and in an increasingly charged election season, the Billionaires’ success in building membership and popularity stems from the fact that “people are looking for change,” according to Perd. “People are very unhappy with the administration at this time and they’re looking for a way to lend their hand to changing that.” As Perd sees it, the Billionaires provide a droll, creative roadmap to effecting such change. “Billionaires for Bush works because of our tight messaging and savvy delivery,” she said. “We know our facts, and we are witty. Plus, it’s fun to be a Billionaire!”

At the spring fundraiser, Billionaires of all ages appeared to agree. Throughout the night, party-goers in tuxedos, opera gloves, and evening gowns streamed into City Stage to watch Billionaire performers convey the group’s message through singalongs, brief speeches defending the rich, and skits in which mock corporation heads and moneyed old-boy networks fought to protect their sizeable political interests.

One of its major successes is that, unlike many other protest groups, the Billionaires have been able to attract participants of all ages and backgrounds with their grandeur. Though Cash and Carry were the youngest Billionaires at the Ball, others ranged in age from seven to seventy. Ariel Willner, aged seven, was wearing a white wedding dress, and answering to “Mary Rich.” According to her mother, Toby Willner, a petite dark-haired woman only slightly less bedecked than her offspring in nuptial attire, their involvement in the Billionaires arose from their participation in the Radical Cheerleaders (defined on its Web site as “activism with pom-poms and middle fingers extended”). “I’m divorced, so when Bush got elected, I would bring Ariel with me to the Radical Cheerleaders practice because I didn’t have a babysitter. She wound up learning the cheers better than me,” said Willner.

Dark-haired Ariel streamed layers of tulle as she shyly circled her mother, who said “I think it’s really rubbed off on [Ariel]. At school they had the students draw pictures of the flag and she wound up drawing two — one was an American flag and the other was a peace flag. It was a golden mothering moment for me,” Willner said with a laugh.

Of her own political involvement, Willner said, “I’ve been doing activist stuff my whole life. Back when I started, you did it because it was the right thing to do, not because it was fun. I think Billionaires for Bush is a great concept — it’s really fun,” she said, gesturing to the throngs of people in their finery. “A lot of people who have progressive sentiments don’t end up getting involved, because they think this is drudgery. If it’s more fun, like this, people want to get involved.”

Source: Clamor Magazine