|
Abortion ship heads back
home after stand-off with Portugal
By Mario de Queiroz
Lisbon, Portugal, Sept. 10 (IPS) The so-called abortion
ship belonging to the Dutch pro-choice foundation Women
on Waves (WoW) is on its way home after spending two weeks in
international waters off the Portuguese coast.
The Borndiep, a converted tugboat, set off Sept. 10 for the Netherlands,
the Portuguese news agency LUSA reported. The crew, led by Dr. Rebecca
Gomperts, the head of WoW, had been planning to stay until Sept. 12
but decided to leave early.
Portugals international image has been badly hurt by the case
of the Borndiep, which was forced by two Portuguese warships to remain
at least 12 nautical miles from the shore since late August. The ship
was invited to Portugal by local pro-choice groups with the aim of reigniting
the debate on womens reproductive rights.
Whatever was achieved by the publicity campaign portraying Portugal
as a modern country fully immersed in the European Union (EU), launched
during the June 12-July 4 2004 European football championship held in
this south European nation, has been buried under countless articles
in the foreign press presenting the image of a backwards country.
The Borndiep, which is now known around the world as the abortion
ship, was to dock on Aug. 29 in the port of Figueira da Foz, 125
miles north of Lisbon, to provide advice on abortion and contraceptives.
But it was repeatedly blocked from entering Portugals territorial
waters, and was forced to stay in international waters, where Dutch
laws would apply to the vessel and it would not be breaking Portuguese
laws by offering the RU-486 or abortion pill to women in the earliest
stages of an unwanted pregnancy.
Portuguese legislation allows the termination of pregnancy only in cases
of rape; when a womans life is in danger or she is at risk of
suffering permanent harm to her physical or mental health; or there
is a risk of malformation of the fetus.
Defence Minister Paulo Portas ordered the Portuguese navy to block the
entrance of the ship, on the argument that the government had to enforce
respect for national laws and prevent a risk to public health
and social peace. The government did not even allow the
ship to refuel at a national port.
The measure was unprecedented in cases involving boats from EU member
countries.
On Thursday, the crew was given permission from the harbor master to
enter the port of Aveiro, in northern Portugal, to stock up on fuel
to return to the Netherlands. But it was blocked from doing so by the
Baptista de Andrade warship.
Activists and analysts said it was difficult to see the tiny Borndiep
as a threat to another European country, since it sails under the Dutch
flag, has a crew made up of six gynecologists and nurses, and carries
a cargo consisting of boxes of condoms, oral contraceptives, IUDs and
ultrasound equipment.
Opposition parties and the Portuguese womens and pro-choice organizations
that invited WoW accused Portas, the leader of a small nationalist far-right
party with ties to the governing conservatives, of imposing his retrograde
ideas on Prime Minister Pedro Santana Lopes, who without that
partys support would not have the strength in parliament to govern.
Even many Portuguese who are not pro-choice say the governments
measures were totally out of proportion. Francisco da Cunha, a practicing
Catholic and womens rights activist, said that from a moral standpoint
he does not support the interruption of a life in gestation,
but added that I cannot agree with authoritarian attitudes.
Da Cunha said the use of military force can only remind us of
Salazarismo an allusion to dictator Antonio de Oliveira
Salazar, who ruled Portugal from 1926 to 1974.
Activist Joao Machado criticized the governments arrogant,
domineering and anti-democratic blocking of the ships entrance
into Portugals territorial waters, in which it repressed
as a crime something that had not yet taken place.
The head of the opposition Socialist Party and president of parliament,
Antonio de Almeida Santos, told the press Sept. 10 that the government
placed the country at the center of an absolutely unnecessary
controversy, where shades of the ridiculous were not lacking.
The government not only blocked the ship from docking in the port
of Figueira da Foz, but it deployed two warships to the limits of our
territorial waters, with the heroic mission of keeping it from passing
that limit, he added.
The Catholic Church largely steered clear of the controversy. But out
of concern for Portugals international image, Januario Torgal
Ferreira, bishop of the armed forces, actually recommended that the
government allow the ship to dock.
An estimated 40,000 clandestine abortions a year are practiced in Portugal.
But it is poor women who must resort to abortions in substandard conditions,
because those who can afford to do so take a plane to London, for example,
where they have their pregnancies terminated in a modern, legal clinic.
No one says abortion is good for women, but WoW advocates
safe abortions instead of those carried out in clandestine, dangerous
conditions, said Gomperts, who unsuccessfully attempted to get the governments
decision overturned in court in Portugal.
According to Professor Boaventura de Sousa Santos at the University
of Coimbra, the court ruling upholding the governments ban on
the entrance of the ship was not surprising, because little can
be expected from the Portuguese justice system, given its lack of experience
in confronting the political powers that be and its atavistic lack of
courage in the sphere of human rights.
No one could imagine that an EU country would threaten, with warships
and its pathetic naval blockade of the Borndiep, a European non-governmental
organization dedicated to raising public awareness on abortion,
he added.
Portugal is the only EU country that takes women to court for undergoing
an abortion.
In countries like Ireland and Poland, where the Catholic Church has
a direct influence on the governments and which also have restrictive
abortion laws, the practice is penalized, but those involved in terminating
a pregnancy are not sent to prison, as occurs in Portugal.
Nor did Ireland and Poland bar the ship from entering their waters on
its respective visits there in 2001 and 2003, when both countries made
an attempt to present an image of themselves as tolerant and open-minded.
But in Portugal, we are once again breathing the air of a retrograde,
hypocritical country, said de Sousa Santos.
The ultraconservative Portuguese group Motherhood and Life lodged an
official complaint, asking that Gomperts be arrested for incitement
to abortion.
Gomperts had appeared on television in Portugal to explain how to carry
out a self-induced abortion safely.
She announced that the groups struggle will continue, and said
the next step will be to file a complaint against the Portuguese government
in the European Court of Human Rights, and to denounce Lisbon in the
European parliament and commission for violating EU agreements on free
circulation.
But she said WoWs mission successfully contributed to making the
problem of abortion visible in Portugal.
Last weekend, Gomperts was visited by two Dutch lawmakers, who traveled
to Figueira da Foz to express their support for WoW. They accused Minister
Portas of illegal, unjustified and disproportionate action.
Lousewies Van der Laan, of the Democrats 66 party, which forms
part of the Dutch ruling coalition, said that when freedom of expression,
association and information are violated, the European Commission has
an important role to play.
She also wondered whether former conservative Portuguese prime minister
José Manuel Durao Barroso, as president of the EU Commission
(the EU executive arm), would defend the European treaties, or
will he merely be a Portuguese politician looking out for the national
interests of his country in Brussels?
Syria, Lebanon reject foreign interference
Sept. 12 Syria and Lebanon rejected on Sept.
12 any foreign interference in shaping their relations, just one day
after a senior US official said that Syria must withdraw its forces
from Lebanon.
Syrian Information Minister Ahmad al-Hasan and his Lebanese counterpart
Michel Samaha denied media reports that claimed changes in their relations
or a redeployment of the 17,000 Syrian forces in Lebanon.
All those who wish to tackle the issue of ties, from outside these
two states, should know that they would be interfering in a Lebanese
issue of sovereignty, Samaha told a news conference that he held
with Hasan in Damascus.
On Sept. 11, US Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs
William Burns said after meeting Syrian president, Bashar Al Asaad,
that it was time for Syria to leave Lebanon.
He also expressed deep concern over Syrian intervention
in its neighbors political process.
Hasan said that pressure on Syria and Lebanon was aimed at infringing
their sovereignty and the unity of their policy tracks.
Samaha said that Burns statement in Damascus would not affect
prospects for any Syrian forces redeployment, which would be determined
by the security needs and sovereign decisions of both countries.
He added that Lebanon might even call for greater Syrian troop deployment
in case of a foreign security threat.
In that case we shield ourselves through a sovereign decision
for redeployment in another way, he said.
UN resolution questioned
Hasan questioned the legitimacy of a UN Security Council resolution
adopted earlier this month demanding that all foreign
forces quit Lebanon, that rebels disarm, and that foreign governments
respect Lebanese sovereignty.
Hasan said that the US and French-backed resolution did not give anyone
the right to impose decisions on Lebanon or to ignore its agreements
with Syria.
The resolution was amended to ensure that it would pass. The word Syrian
troops was changed to foreign troops.
Although the resolution did not mention Syria by name, it was seen as
an attempt to end the Syrian military presence in Lebanon.
The Lebanese parliament defied the UN resolution by voting shortly afterwards
to extend the term of President Emile Lahoud. The US claimed that Damascus
was behind this move.
Last May, the United States imposed unilateral sanctions on Syria after
accusing it of backing anti-Israeli groups and seeking to develop weapons
of mass destruction. Washington also claimed that Damascus was not doing
enough to prevent anti-US rebels from crossing into neighboring Iraq.
Syria denied all the US charges.
In response to Burns comments that Syria must curb the activities
of anti-Israeli groups to allow progress in Arab-Israeli peacemaking,
Hasan said that violence resulted from Israeli occupation of the Palestinian
territories.
The resistance of the Palestinian people is a legitimate right
that is guaranteed by the United Nations pact, therefore there should
be a definition for terrorism that differentiates between it and legitimate
struggle against occupation, he said.
Securing Iraqi border
Hasan praised Washingtons willingness to talk saying that it is
a positive development in relations and reiterated that Syria would
cooperate with US security experts to try to stabilize Iraq.
Also Burns said that the United States and Syria were considering ways
to secure Syrias border with Iraq in order to stop the alleged
rebels from slipping into the war-torn country.
Burns described his talks with President Bashar al-Assad as thorough
and candid.
We talked about ways in which we might explore cooperation with
regard to Iraq and our concerns about border security as well as the
activities of groups operating out of Syrian territory, who threaten
efforts to ensure stability and security in Iraq, he said.
When asked about the potential for joint Syrian-US patrols, Burns said:
We talked about mechanisms through which we can talk about practical
ways in which we can help ensure border security, which is in the mutual
interest of Iraqis as well as Syrians.
On the other hand, Syrian Information Minister described the initial
talks as a positive development that will have consequences on
the regional situation.
He added that Both parties want to pursue dialogue in order to
resolve these problems. He also said that Burns had not made any
specific demands of Syria.
Samaha said that Burns had not issued a warning to Damascus.
He said that Burns statement was prepared in advance and
did not reflect discussions with Assad, describing current talks
as constructive, positive, and stimulating.
Meanwhile, Israel accused Syria of destabilizing the Middle East by
allowing rebels to cross its borders into Iraq, the latest in a long
line of attacks by Israel on the Syrian regime.
Syria does not prevent the passage of terrorists into Iraq,
Israels armed forces chief, General Moshe Yaalon, alleged.
In practice, Syria supports the terrorists in Iraq by cooperating
with the former regime. This policy threatens regional stability,
he added.
Source: aljazeera.net
Peace activist held as danger
to Israel
By Chris McGreal
Jerusalem, Israel, Sept. 7 Tali Fahima served her time
in the Israeli army, voted for Ariel Sharon as prime minister, and
took it as given that her country was struggling for survival against
terrorism.
Then last year, the 29-year-old legal secretary from Tel Aviv picked
up a newspaper and read about Zakariya Zubeidi, the Jenin leader of
the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, the group responsible for killing hundreds
of Israelis in suicide bombings and shootings. Fahima decided she
would ask Zubeidi why he killed Jews.
On Sept. 5, the military placed Fahima in detention without trial
using a law applied to thousands of Palestinians over the past four
years of intifada but rarely to Israelis.
The authorities declined to reveal the precise reasons but the defense
minister, Shaul Mofaz, who signed the order, described her as a
clear and present danger to all Israelis.
Intelligence sources told the Israeli press that Fahima had a hand
in bombing an army checkpoint last month, and that she was planning
attacks inside Israel.
But Fahimas lawyers and friends accuse the government of using
draconian security laws to silence her because she has broken a taboo
against befriending and explaining the enemy.
Fahima started visiting Zubeidi in Jenin a little more than a year
ago, despite an Israeli ban on its citizens traveling to Palestinian
towns. She said she wanted to find out what motivated him to kill.
I had to ask why a man goes ahead and does this, she told
Israeli television this year. There is a reason for this. A
man doesnt wake up one morning and decide, OK, Im
going to carry out an attack.
The army describes Zubeidi as one of its most-wanted terrorists. It
has tried in vain to kill him five times.
After several meetings with the al-Aqsa brigades commander,
Fahima described him as a freedom fighter and a kindhearted
person whom I was lucky to meet. She said she would be a human
shield to protect him from Israeli assassination attempts.
It is hard for a 28-year-old girl who was brought up on certain
values to find out one day that they are all wrong, she told
the Jerusalem Post in June. Who causes the occupation? The Palestinians?
No. It is the Israelis and who am I? A Jew and an Israeli and by sitting
at home and doing nothing I am also responsible.
Zubeidi is not a terrorist, rather he is fighting against the
occupation. Suicide bombers are also fighting the occupation. Put
yourself in their place and see what happens. They are denied basic
rights and freedom.
Those views have infuriated many Israelis who have denounced Fahima
as a traitor and terrorist sympathizer. Her religious parents refuse
to speak to her, and she was sacked from her job.
Fahimas lawyers say that if there were evidence she was involved
in violence, the authorities would have laid charges, not place her
in the limbo of administrative detention.
The justice minister, Yosef Lapid, said the activist has not been
charged due to the need to protect intelligence sources.
There is very, very concrete evidence in the material indicating
that she acted in a manner that endangers the security of Israel.
Until there is a trial, the relevant officials believe that it would
be better from the point of view of the security of Israel that she
remain in detention, he said.
But Fahimas lawyer, Smadar Ben-Natan, says her client was detained
last month after refusing to inform for the Shin Bet.
[The intelligence services] are attempting to prove to her that
she is politically mistaken, they are giving her history lessons,
debating with her whether this should be described as occupation,
whether Palestinian fighters should be defined as freedom fighters
or as terrorists, she said.
One of Fahimas friends, Lin Dovrat, a peace activist, said the
political motives behind her detention were clear from the authorities
claim that information against her was too sensitive to be made public
in court while the Shin Bet leaked accusations to the press.
They tried to kill Zubeidi five times and failed and she got
to him and was able to talk to him and was able to connect with him
on a very basic human level and I think that drives them nuts,
she said.
Ben-Natan says that when Fahima refused to collaborate with the Shin
Bet, it sought to discredit her by telling journalists she was sleeping
with Zubeidi, who is married. It is an accusation widely given credibility
in the Israeli press, and denied by Fahima.
Source: Guardian (UK)
School atrocity may reignite conflict
in Russian republics
By Carolynne Wheeler
Prigorodny, Russia, Sept. 10 On the surface it is an
unlikely battleground: fields dotted with broken-down buildings, cows
and chickens surrounding a sleepy town with faded brick buildings
and dusty streets.
But Prigorodny, where neighboring Russian republics fought in 1992,
is preparing for another conflict, this time provoked by the school
hostage-taking in nearby Beslan. It is the Muslim Ingush here who
fear reprisals, and they would be easy targets for the mainly Christian
Ossetians, who seem determined on avenging the more than 350 people
killed and 700 wounded last week.
Some have already fled; others are digging in, saying that they will
fight if needs be.
[The terrorists] shouldnt have done that, said Alekhan
Akhilgov, 27, an ethnic Ingush living on the edge of Prigorodny district.
Theyve got lots of people of different nationalities in
trouble, including Ingush. Those that are guilty, they should suffer
the revenge.
Zena Doskieva, 50, said: When we walk out of our houses people
stare at us strangely. People say there were Ingush terrorists among
them.
Weve lived our whole life here. Our children go to school
here. The terrorists should run away. They are not Ingush or Ossetian;
they are terrorists.
Angry young Ossetian men loitering on a street corner did not seem
to see it that way.
What would you do if this happened to your child? You would
do the same. Its been the same here for ages, said Alan,
a boxer, who gave his age as 29, though he looked much younger. The
patience of the people is going to run out one day ... I think there
will be war, not a large-scale war but war will happen.
Many families fled across the border to Ingushetia as soon as they
heard about the occupation of the school, not even waiting for the
end of the siege, expecting the backlash which began at the weekend.
The Russian media reported that as many as 1,000 Ossetians surrounded
Prigorodny on the night of Sept. 5, though the attack was thwarted
by police blockades.
The situation is very tense. People are really upset; the whole
area is basically in shock and also very scared because the situation
is so uncertain, said Ekaterina Sokirianskaya of the human rights
group Memorial in the Ingushetian capital, Nazran.
There are other signs of trouble: many Ingush patients in Ossetian
hospitals have transferred themselves to Nazran hospitals.
Kazbek Sultygov, head of the Ingushetian state commission on refugees
and displaced persons, said: They didnt feel comfortable
after what happened. They were afraid that some anti-Ingush movement
might start. Thats why people dont want to provoke anything,
and they behave in a very cautious way.
Ingush students at medical and agricultural colleges in the North
Ossetian capital, Vladikavkaz, were asked by the university rector
to take indefinite academic leave, and there were buses ready to take
them, Memorial said.
It is very dangerous to stay here. The situation is very dangerous
and very flammable, said Madina, a young English teacher with
a three-year-old son, who said she and her husband were making plans
to leave the small Ossetian town of Maysky to stay with her parents
in Nazran. Peoples moods are very bad. They are very cruel;
I dont know what they will do with us. Kartsa, on the
border, was set upon by about 200 Ossetian men on the night of Sept.
4, although local police stopped the attack.
Bad blood between the Ossetians and the Ingush dates back centuries,
but in modern times the tension in the area between Vladikavkaz and
the Ingushetian border has been rooted in Stalins forced deportation
of the Ingush during the second world war, and their return a decade
later to homes which had been given over to Ossetians.
During the fighting of 12 years ago, 50,000 or so Ingush fled the
district. About 20,000 have returned, and many are now rebuilding
their houses with the help of government compensation. But the resentment
has been quietly growing, fed by the Ossetians fear that Ingush
militants were aiding the separatists in Chechnya.
The police have seized caches of weapons in the area in recent months,
and ethnic Ingush and Chechen fighters were reported to be among those
who attacked Russian government buildings in Nazran in June.
If war begins, it may ignite the Caucasus, Sergei Artuniov, head of
the Caucasus department of the Moscow institute of ethnology, said.
Ruslan, 45, an Ossetian driver living in Prigorodny, agreed. [The
Ingush] should have the conscience to understand that Ossetians would
never live with them together. If they dont leave themselves,
we will ask them to, as in 1992.
Source: Guardian (UK)
Housing revolution attempted in Venezuela
By Robin Nieto
Caracas, Venezuela, Sept. 2 Across the country, the
Venezuelan government, via the Ministry of Infrastructure (MINFRA)
and other housing institutions, is opening new housing projects, providing
homes for the poorest of Venezuelans.
Housing projects to benefit the poor are not new in Venezuela and
not restricted to President Hugo Chavezs government. In the
state of Miranda, adjacent to the district of Caracas, opposition
Governor Enrique Mendoza also provides homes for Venezuelas
poor. Both leaders have been accused of political grandstanding by
using housing projects and social programs as a method to win votes
during election periods.
However, unlike Mendoza, Chavez has based his political platform on
his Bolivarian Revolution, which is essentially a new deal
for an estimated 80 percent of Venezuelans who live in poverty. His
social revolution is comprised of new social programs in health, education,
and housing, fueled by the countrys oil income. Venezuela is
the 5th largest exporter of oil in the world.
Tapping into the countrys previously impenetrable oil fund,
which was once controlled by a tiny oiligarchy, has made
Chavezs social programs possible. Recently, the Chavez government
dedicated more than $500 million for what he calls a revolutionary
mission to deal with the housing crisis in Venezuela. There
is a deficit of almost 1,800,000 houses in the country, according
to MINFRA, and the ministry in charge of housing has set a goal to
build 130,000 houses before the end of the year.
Chavez recently appointed a new housing minister and announced by
Dec. 31 the new housing mission will become its own ministry. While
details of how the new mission and the new ministry will be organized
or why the new ministry is necessary have not been provided, it is
clear that the current government system, based on the pre-Chavez
era of providing housing through a complex system of numerous semi-independent
housing institutions, has been less than effective in many parts of
the country.
In Miranda state, on the outskirts of a beachside town called Higuerote,
two hours northwest of Caracas, MINFRA, along with housing institute
Fundabarrios, teamed up to build a housing community from scratch
in a place ironically called Isla Fantasia, or Fantasy Island.
The project started more than a year ago, providing brand new three
bedroom bungalow homes for people who lived in dirt floor shacks that
were regularly flooded during the rainy season by surrounding creeks
and rivers.
A year later there are mixed reactions among residents who are still
grateful to Chavez for the houses they have received, but are also
asking what happened to the supporting infrastructure and the landfill
for their most pressing problem, flooding.
Romulo Salas, president of the residents association, says that
the government has built homes, but that infrastructure problems persist.
Thirty-four houses have been built during the past year along
with four housing foundations, Salas said. But our biggest
problem is the rain. When it rains, the area is flooded and the resources
we need to resolve the problem have not arrived. While the community
struggles to deal with constant flooding with little in the way of
resources, Salas said there are 500 children who live in Isla Fantasia.
We hope President Chavez will build a school for us soon,
Salas said. He also explained that the town electricity system has
been extended to Isla Fantasia, but that payment methods have yet
to be formalized. This means that people are living in a permanent
blackout under brand new power lines until that issue is resolved.
43-year-old Zoraida Camacho has piled up landfill in large mounds
in front of her shack made of corrugated steel sheets. We are
missing everything here, Camacho says. We need sewage
lines, potable water, pavement for the street. When it rains here
this place is a mud puddle. We cant keep waiting [for the government]
to come, so we do what we can to get by, but we are in a critical
condition here, Camacho said, adding that she is waiting for
her own house that she applied for last year. Her shelter stands less
than three yards from one of the creeks that floods the area. She
has lived this way for the last 12 years.
Along with missing infrastructure, residents agree that the grim reality
they face is unemployment. Here we do not have employment,
says Luis Alvarez, president of a local cooperative that wants to
provide services for the neighborhood. What we have here is
survival, says Alvarez, adding that people in Isla Fantasia
are not waiting for the government to provide them with everything
but rather they are asking to participate in the development of their
neighborhood. We have skilled workers here who can build the
infrastructure we need, Alvarez says. So why did the government
send in outside private contractors that did a poor job, at least
on my house, and who we have never seen again? Alvarez asked.
Through the local co-op, Alvarez and eleven others presented a community
work plan to the national government and to the previous Minister
of Infrastructure, Diosdado Cabello, (now running for governor against
Enrique Mendoza), which outlined how the community can participate
in building the roads, the sewage lines, the potable water system,
the houses, and filling in the creeks, to alleviate unemployment in
the neighborhood. The co-op submitted the proposal a year ago and
to date they have not received a word from the national government.
We do not know why, Alvarez said.
Calls to both MINFRA and to Fundabarrios at their headquarters in
Caracas revealed that both government institutes had no information
on the housing development at Isla Fantasia this despite a
large sign at the entrance to the neighborhood that says Fundabarrios
in large print across a three meter wide sign, as well as the blue
MINFRA logo that designates the housing project as their program.
President Chavez said that while government housing institutions have
done a good job, they have to deepen. He added that housing
projects will include integration with supporting infrastructure such
as schools, medical clinics, green spaces, and even small industry
created by cooperatives. For the residents of Isla Fantasia, Chavezs
vision is exactly what they are missing and exactly what they are
calling for.
With upcoming elections for state governors and mayors, the race in
Miranda state will be close, since the state was almost equally divided
during the presidential referendum last August 15, between those who
wanted to end Chavezs term in office at and those wanted him
to continue as president.
Source: Venezuelanalysis
Iran insists on peaceful
nuclear development
Sept. 12 Iran rejected on Sept. 12 limitations
on its right to develop peaceful nuclear technology,
amid mounting pressure from UN nuclear watchdog to suspend all uranium
enrichment-related activities.
Foreign ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi also said on Sept. 12
that the Islamic republics supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei,
had issued a verdict banning the use of nuclear weapons, reiterating
that nobody in Iran was seeking the bomb.
When asked if Iran was offering concessions on building centrifuge
components during talks with the European Union, he said: Nothing
official from the Islamic republic has been said or announced in
this regard so far.
We have more important issues and this is a marginal issue,
Asefi told reporters.
If the Europeans and the international community want assurances
that nuclear technology will be used for peaceful purposes, we are
ready to give assurances within the framework of the additional
protocol, he said.
But if the issue is that we cannot master nuclear technology
for peaceful purposes, that is out of the question because we have
already reached that point, he asserted.
It is not clear if Asefi was referring to Irans attitude to
the resolution due to be considered by the International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA), which was due on Sept. 13 to resume its discussions
over Irans nukes.
Prepared for the Sept. 13 start of a key meeting of the International
Atomic Energy Agency, the document suggests a trigger mechanism,
warning of possible further steps which diplomats
defined as shorthand for referral of Irans case to the UN
Security Council.
The US has claimed that Iran was covertly trying to develop nuclear
weapons, however Iran has denied the allegations more than once
and asserted that it was merely trying to generate electricity.
We are ready to give assurances, because from the beginning
we said using nuclear weapons is haram (forbidden in Islam). The
supreme leader (Khamenei) has issued a fatwa on this. No group in
this country is thinking of acquiring nuclear weapons, Asefi
said.
No further details regarding Khameneis edict were immediately
available.
The US wants Iran referred to the UN Security Council, but Asefi
challenged this wont happen.
Irans dossier will not be sent to the UN Security Council
because there is no reason for it, he said.
France, Britain and Germany have agreed to set a November deadline
for Iran to dispel concern that it is secretly developing a nuclear
bomb.
The draft of resolution was formally submitted to the board of governors
of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) meeting on Sept.
13.
The resolution urges Iran to halt all uranium enrichment related
activities and sets a November deadline for Iran to allay accusations
it is secretly developing nuclear weapons.
The draft says the board will probably consider whether
further steps are needed after receiving IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradeis
next report on Iran in November.
The document brings the three European countries closer to the US
hard-line regarding Irans nuclear program.
Source: aljazeera net
Mercenary Mann sentenced to
seven years in jail over coup plot
By Terry Kirby
Sept. 11 A former Special Air Service (SAS) officer
accused of planning a coup in Equatorial Guinea was sentenced to
seven years in Zimbabwe Sept. 12 for arms offences.
Simon Mann, 51, who was arrested in March when a team of mercenaries
he led landed in the Zimbabwean capital, Harare, admitted two weeks
ago that he had illegally tried to buy weapons. The 65 other men
on the plane were each sentenced to 12 months for immigration offences;
the two pilots were given 16 months.
The sentences came amid fresh claims about the funding of the operation,
which allegedly included a contribution from Sir Mark Thatcher.
The military operation is said to have been aimed at unseating President
Teodoro Obiang Nguema of Equatorial Guinea, Africas third-largest
oil producer.
Relatives broke down in tears when the jail terms were announced
by a magistrate in a makeshift court inside Chikurubi maximum-security
prison, where the men have been detained since their arrest. Observers
said the sentences were stiffer than expected.
Mishrod Guvamombe, the magistrate, said: The accused [Simon
Mann] was the author of the whole transaction. He was caught while
trying to take the firearms out of the country. The
magistrate said the offences were well planned and well executed
and that must be reflected in the penalty.
The court ordered the seizure of Manns $3 million Boeing 727
and $180,000 found on board. The men claimed the weapons were intended
to provide security at a diamond mine in the Democratic Republic
of Congo.
Funding for the coup attempt is said to have come from a group of
businessmen in South Africa and London who aimed to take over the
country and make millions from its oil wealth. All of those named
have denied involvement. They have been identified by the so-called
Wonga list, information given to the South African authorities by
two ex-colleagues of Mann who have agreed to give evidence.
According to reports yesterday, Ely Calil, the secretive London-based
Lebanese oil millionaire, contributed $750,000, while Greg Wales
and Gary Hersham, also London-based, and David Tremain, a Briton
based in South Africa, each contributed about $500,000.
Mann himself is said to have given $500,000 but demanded a $18 million
payment for leading the operation, as well as $81,000 to purchase
the arms and a contract to provide security for the planned new
head of state, said to have been Severo Moto, an exiled opposition
politician.
Another figure allegedly involved in funding is Thatcher, son of
the former prime minister, who was arrested last month by the South
African authorities and charged with taking part in foreign military
activity. His lawyer says his client has been accused of providing
financing for a helicopter to be used in the coup attempt. Thatcher,
who denies the allegation, has been ordered to appear before a magistrate
on Sept. 22.
The name A J H Archer the initials of the disgraced
peer Lord Archer of Weston-super-Mare is said to appear on
documents which suggest that Mann was paid $133,000 by credit transfer
four days before his arrest. Archer, who is said to be close to
Calil, has denied all knowledge of any plot.
David Hart, a millionaire businessman who advised Thatchers
mother during the miners strike, was named by Mann in a letter
sent from jail, asking for help from his friends. Hart has also
denied any involvement.
Nick du Toit, an associate of Manns, is among 15 others on
trial for their lives in Equatorial Guinea, accused of taking part
in the coup plot; he has admitted involvement. The country has also
applied for international arrest warrants for Mann, Thatcher and
others.
Unless Zimbabwe agrees to Mann being deported, he is likely to serve
his sentence in Chikurubi prison, which has been condemned by human
rights organizations. Prisoners are confined to shared cells for
most of the day, fed a meager diet and live in unsanitary conditions.
Mann and his companions have complained about conditions at the
prison and claim they have been beaten.
Stephen Jakobi, director of the pressure group Fair Trials Abroad,
said: There is a very real problem in countries where nobody
gets a fair trial, because they do not observe international standards,
and I am afraid we are dealing with one here. British
embassy staff have attended the trial and visited Mann in prison.
Mann, who has six children and a home in Hampshire, has had a colorful
career. The son of an England cricket captain and heir to the Watneys
brewing fortune, he was educated at Eton and Sandhurst, joined the
Scots Guards and then the SAS. After leaving the Army in 1981 he
became involved in private security companies specializing in conflict
zones in Africa.
Henry Bellingham, the Tory MP, said he had known Mann since their
schooldays. Bellingham, who called on the Government to press for
his return to the UK, said: I find it very difficult to believe
the allegations. He has always been an adventurer, but a thoroughly
professional one. This just isnt his style.
Any sentence from a court in Zimbabwe, where the whole legal
system has been discredited, is something the British Government
must take a close interest in.
Source: Independent (UK)
US tries to cover up $10 million
given to Venezuelan opposition
By Eva Golinger-Moncada
Sept. 9 According to the Venezuela Solidarity Committee
in New York, documents recently obtained from the US Department
of State under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by www.venezuelafoia.info
demonstrate that during the past two years more than $5 million
annually was given by the United States Agency for International
Development (USAID) to various organizations in Venezuela, many
of which are aligned with the opposition.
One of the key groups collaborating with USAID is Sumate, the organization
that promoted the recall referendum campaign against President Hugo
Chavez and which is now rejecting results certified by the most
credible international observers and even by the US government.
Sumate, despite its numerous undemocratic positions and actions,
has also been a recipient of US government funds from the National
Endowment for Democracy (NED) in 2003.
However, new documents obtained by Venezuelafoia.info have all been
censored by the US government despite the use of the FOIA, which
is intended to ensure transparency in US government operations.
The Department of State has withheld the names of the organizations
receiving financing from USAID by misapplying a FOIA exemption that
is intended to protect personnel and medical files of
individuals.
Such clear censorship indicates that USAID and the US government
clearly have something to hide regarding their collaborations with
the Venezuelan opposition. Despite USAIDs ongoing crusade
to encourage transparency in foreign governments, the withholding
of information that does not fall under any available exemptions
clearly demonstrates a double standard applied by the US government
in this case.
USAID is financed by the US Congress and controlled by the US Department
of State. Founded by President John F. Kennedy in 1961, USAID was
established as a fund dedicated to humanitarian intervention around
the world. Despite Kennedys humane intentions, USAID has more
recently been used, in many instances, as a mechanism to promote
the interests of the US in strategically important countries around
the world.
In the case of Venezuela, USAID maintains a private contractor in
Caracas monitoring and facilitating its projects and funds and also
has a local operating center, the Office of Transition Initiatives
(OTI) that was established in 2002, after the failed coup detat
against President Chavez. The private contractor, Development Alternatives,
Inc. (DAI), manages and supervises grants approved by USAID to Venezuelan
organizations.
Under a program entitled Venezuela: Initiative to Build Confidence,
DAI has awarded 67 grants to Venezuelan organizations in various
sectors and areas of interest. These grants equal $2.3 million,
just during 2003. In total, DAI s program in Venezuela counts
on $10,000,000 in funding for the period August 2002 through August
2004 - $5 million annually to focus on common goals for
the future of Venezuela.
According to the documents obtained under FOIA and DAIs project
description none of the project grants or programs have been in
collaboration with the Venezuelan government.
In fact, many of the same recipients of US government funds through
the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) have received USAID funding
through DAI. Despite the illegal withholding of names on the USAID-DAI
grants, one document apparently was skipped, at least in part. The
name Sumate appears on a grant intended to encourage
electoral participation in the recall referendum, citing
$84,840 as the total grant amount.
Combined with the NED grant of $53,400 given to Sumate in 2003-2004,
the organization that is now crying fraud about the recall referendum
against President Chavez -- the results of which have been recognized
as absolutely credible by the Carter Center and the US Department
of State -- has received, at minimum, more than $200,000 in just
one year for promoting its attempts to remove Venezuelas President
from office.
Other recipients of USAID funds through DAI which are apparent in
the censored documents include the organization Liderazgo y Visión
for its project, Un Sueño para Venezuela, (A
Dream for Venezuela) a project created in 2002-2003 with the
intent of offering an alternative vision and agenda for those opposing
President Chavez administration. Liderazgo y Visión
has also been a recipient of NED funds over the past few years.
More than six organizations have been given funding for political
and social formation and development in Petare, a poor neighborhood
in the outskirts of Caracas, in Miranda State. The work in Petare,
and the more than $200,000 that have been funneled into that neighborhood
in the past year, appear to have been aimed at converting a community
that was traditionally pro-Chavez into one that supports the opposition.
The recall referendum results from August 15, 2004 show the opposition
gaining substantial numbers in Petare, and Miranda State was one
of only two states in the entire nation that gave victory to the
opposition in the referendum.
One grant from USAID/DAI focuses on the creation of radio and television
commercials during the December 2002-February 2003 strike imposed
by the opposition, during which the private media dedicated its
airwaves 24/7 to opposition propaganda.
One of the most striking aspects of the medias dedication
to the strike was the use of anti-Chavez commercials to indoctrinate
viewers opinions on Venezuelas political situation.
The USAID/DAI grant shows funding originating from the US government
for some of these anti-Chavez commercials, collaborating with former
Fedecamaras President Carlos Fernandez, who was one of the leaders
of the strike, in the project.
These new documents from USAID evidence a clear focus on two major
projects in Venezuela: The Recall Referendum and the Formation of
a National Agenda that would serve as a transitional government
post-Chavez (assuming the referendum was won by the opposition).
Source: Vheadline.com
|