No. 296, Sept. 16-22, 2004

SECCIÓN EN ESPAÑOL

WORLD NEWS



To read an article, click on the headline.

‘Abortion ship’ heads back home after stand-off with Portugal

The Borndiep off the coast of Portugal.

Photo by Nadya Peek, courtesy Women on Waves

Syria, Lebanon reject foreign interference

Map of Syria and surrounding countries courtesy CIA World Factbook

Peace activist held as ‘danger to Israel’

Zakariya Zubeidi and Tali Fahima.

Photo courtesy Maariv International

School atrocity may reignite conflict in Russian republics

Map of Russia’s autonomous regions in the caucuses.

Images courtesy AGR

Housing revolution attempted in Venezuela

Iran insists on ‘peaceful’ nuclear development

Mercenary Mann sentenced to
seven years in jail over coup plot

US tries to cover up $10 million
given to Venezuelan opposition

 





‘Abortion ship’ heads back home after stand-off with Portugal

By Mario de Queiroz

Lisbon, Portugal, Sept. 10 (IPS)— The so-called “abortion ship” belonging to the Dutch pro-choice foundation “Women on Waves” (WoW) is on its way home after spending two weeks in international waters off the Portuguese coast.

The Borndiep, a converted tugboat, set off Sept. 10 for the Netherlands, the Portuguese news agency LUSA reported. The crew, led by Dr. Rebecca Gomperts, the head of WoW, had been planning to stay until Sept. 12 but decided to leave early.

Portugal’s international image has been badly hurt by the case of the Borndiep, which was forced by two Portuguese warships to remain at least 12 nautical miles from the shore since late August. The ship was invited to Portugal by local pro-choice groups with the aim of reigniting the debate on women’s reproductive rights.

Whatever was achieved by the publicity campaign portraying Portugal as a modern country fully immersed in the European Union (EU), launched during the June 12-July 4 2004 European football championship held in this south European nation, has been buried under countless articles in the foreign press presenting the image of a backwards country.

The Borndiep, which is now known around the world as the “abortion ship,” was to dock on Aug. 29 in the port of Figueira da Foz, 125 miles north of Lisbon, to provide advice on abortion and contraceptives.

But it was repeatedly blocked from entering Portugal’s territorial waters, and was forced to stay in international waters, where Dutch laws would apply to the vessel and it would not be breaking Portuguese laws by offering the RU-486 or abortion pill to women in the earliest stages of an unwanted pregnancy.

Portuguese legislation allows the termination of pregnancy only in cases of rape; when a woman’s life is in danger or she is at risk of suffering permanent harm to her physical or mental health; or there is a risk of malformation of the fetus.

Defence Minister Paulo Portas ordered the Portuguese navy to block the entrance of the ship, on the argument that the government had to enforce respect for national laws and prevent a risk to “public health” and “social peace.” The government did not even allow the ship to refuel at a national port.

The measure was unprecedented in cases involving boats from EU member countries.

On Thursday, the crew was given permission from the harbor master to enter the port of Aveiro, in northern Portugal, to stock up on fuel to return to the Netherlands. But it was blocked from doing so by the Baptista de Andrade warship.

Activists and analysts said it was difficult to see the tiny Borndiep as a threat to another European country, since it sails under the Dutch flag, has a crew made up of six gynecologists and nurses, and carries a cargo consisting of boxes of condoms, oral contraceptives, IUDs and ultrasound equipment.

Opposition parties and the Portuguese women’s and pro-choice organizations that invited WoW accused Portas, the leader of a small nationalist far-right party with ties to the governing conservatives, of imposing his “retrograde ideas” on Prime Minister Pedro Santana Lopes, who without that party’s support would not have the strength in parliament to govern.

Even many Portuguese who are not pro-choice say the government’s measures were totally out of proportion. Francisco da Cunha, a practicing Catholic and women’s rights activist, said that from a moral standpoint he does not “support the interruption of a life in gestation,” but added that “I cannot agree with authoritarian attitudes.”

Da Cunha said the use of military force “can only remind us of Salazarismo” — an allusion to dictator Antonio de Oliveira Salazar, who ruled Portugal from 1926 to 1974.

Activist Joao Machado criticized the government’s “arrogant, domineering and anti-democratic” blocking of the ship’s entrance into Portugal’s territorial waters, in which it “repressed as a crime something that had not yet taken place.”

The head of the opposition Socialist Party and president of parliament, Antonio de Almeida Santos, told the press Sept. 10 that the government “placed the country at the center of an absolutely unnecessary controversy, where shades of the ridiculous were not lacking.”

The government “not only blocked the ship from docking in the port of Figueira da Foz, but it deployed two warships to the limits of our territorial waters, with the heroic mission of keeping it from passing that limit,” he added.

The Catholic Church largely steered clear of the controversy. But out of concern for Portugal’s international image, Januario Torgal Ferreira, bishop of the armed forces, actually recommended that the government allow the ship to dock.

An estimated 40,000 clandestine abortions a year are practiced in Portugal. But it is poor women who must resort to abortions in substandard conditions, because those who can afford to do so take a plane to London, for example, where they have their pregnancies terminated in a modern, legal clinic.

“No one says abortion is good for women,” but WoW advocates safe abortions instead of those carried out in clandestine, dangerous conditions, said Gomperts, who unsuccessfully attempted to get the government’s decision overturned in court in Portugal.

According to Professor Boaventura de Sousa Santos at the University of Coimbra, the court ruling upholding the government’s ban on the entrance of the ship was not surprising, because “little can be expected from the Portuguese justice system, given its lack of experience in confronting the political powers that be and its atavistic lack of courage in the sphere of human rights.”

“No one could imagine that an EU country would threaten, with warships and its pathetic naval blockade of the Borndiep, a European non-governmental organization dedicated to raising public awareness” on abortion, he added.

Portugal is the only EU country that takes women to court for undergoing an abortion.

In countries like Ireland and Poland, where the Catholic Church has a direct influence on the governments and which also have restrictive abortion laws, the practice is penalized, but those involved in terminating a pregnancy are not sent to prison, as occurs in Portugal.

Nor did Ireland and Poland bar the ship from entering their waters on its respective visits there in 2001 and 2003, when both countries made an attempt to present an image of themselves as tolerant and open-minded.

But in Portugal, “we are once again breathing the air of a retrograde, hypocritical country,” said de Sousa Santos.

The ultraconservative Portuguese group Motherhood and Life lodged an official complaint, asking that Gomperts be arrested for “incitement to abortion.”

Gomperts had appeared on television in Portugal to explain how to carry out a self-induced abortion safely.

She announced that the group’s struggle will continue, and said the next step will be to file a complaint against the Portuguese government in the European Court of Human Rights, and to denounce Lisbon in the European parliament and commission for violating EU agreements on free circulation.

But she said WoW’s mission successfully contributed to making the problem of abortion visible in Portugal.

Last weekend, Gomperts was visited by two Dutch lawmakers, who traveled to Figueira da Foz to express their support for WoW. They accused Minister Portas of “illegal, unjustified and disproportionate” action.

Lousewies Van der Laan, of the Democrats ’66 party, which forms part of the Dutch ruling coalition, said that when freedom of expression, association and information are violated, the European Commission has an important role to play.

She also wondered whether former conservative Portuguese prime minister José Manuel Durao Barroso, as president of the EU Commission (the EU executive arm), would “defend the European treaties, or will he merely be a Portuguese politician looking out for the national interests of his country in Brussels?”

Syria, Lebanon reject foreign interference

Sept. 12— Syria and Lebanon rejected on Sept. 12 any foreign interference in shaping their relations, just one day after a senior US official said that Syria must withdraw its forces from Lebanon.

Syrian Information Minister Ahmad al-Hasan and his Lebanese counterpart Michel Samaha denied media reports that claimed changes in their relations or a redeployment of the 17,000 Syrian forces in Lebanon.

“All those who wish to tackle the issue of ties, from outside these two states, should know that they would be interfering in a Lebanese issue of sovereignty,” Samaha told a news conference that he held with Hasan in Damascus.

On Sept. 11, US Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs William Burns said after meeting Syrian president, Bashar Al Asaad, that it was time for Syria to leave Lebanon.

He also expressed “deep concern over Syrian intervention” in its neighbor’s political process.

Hasan said that pressure on Syria and Lebanon was aimed at infringing their sovereignty and the unity of their policy tracks.

Samaha said that Burns’ statement in Damascus would not affect prospects for any Syrian forces redeployment, which would be determined by the security needs and sovereign decisions of both countries.

He added that Lebanon might even call for greater Syrian troop deployment in case of a foreign security threat.

“In that case we shield ourselves through a sovereign decision for redeployment in another way,” he said.

UN resolution questioned

Hasan questioned the legitimacy of a UN Security Council resolution — adopted earlier this month — demanding that all foreign forces quit Lebanon, that rebels disarm, and that foreign governments respect Lebanese sovereignty.

Hasan said that the US and French-backed resolution did not give anyone the right to impose decisions on Lebanon or to ignore its agreements with Syria.

The resolution was amended to ensure that it would pass. The word “Syrian troops” was changed to “foreign troops.”

Although the resolution did not mention Syria by name, it was seen as an attempt to end the Syrian military presence in Lebanon.

The Lebanese parliament defied the UN resolution by voting shortly afterwards to extend the term of President Emile Lahoud. The US claimed that Damascus was behind this move.

Last May, the United States imposed unilateral sanctions on Syria after accusing it of backing anti-Israeli groups and seeking to develop weapons of mass destruction. Washington also claimed that Damascus was not doing enough to prevent anti-US rebels from crossing into neighboring Iraq.

Syria denied all the US charges.

In response to Burns’ comments that Syria must curb the activities of anti-Israeli groups to allow progress in Arab-Israeli peacemaking, Hasan said that violence resulted from Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories.

“The resistance of the Palestinian people is a legitimate right that is guaranteed by the United Nations pact, therefore there should be a definition for terrorism that differentiates between it and legitimate struggle against occupation,” he said.

Securing Iraqi border

Hasan praised Washington’s willingness to talk saying that it is a positive development in relations and reiterated that Syria would cooperate with US security experts to try to stabilize Iraq.

Also Burns said that the United States and Syria were considering ways to secure Syria’s border with Iraq in order to stop the alleged rebels from slipping into the war-torn country.

Burns described his talks with President Bashar al-Assad as “thorough and candid.”

“We talked about ways in which we might explore cooperation with regard to Iraq and our concerns about border security as well as the activities of groups operating out of Syrian territory, who threaten efforts to ensure stability and security in Iraq,” he said.

When asked about the potential for joint Syrian-US patrols, Burns said: “We talked about mechanisms through which we can talk about practical ways in which we can help ensure border security, which is in the mutual interest of Iraqis as well as Syrians.”

On the other hand, Syrian Information Minister described the initial talks as “a positive development that will have consequences on the regional situation.”

He added that “Both parties want to pursue dialogue in order to resolve these problems.” He also said that Burns had not made any specific demands of Syria.

Samaha said that Burns had not issued a warning to Damascus.

He said that “Burns’ statement was prepared in advance and did not reflect discussions” with Assad, describing current talks as “constructive, positive, and stimulating.”

Meanwhile, Israel accused Syria of destabilizing the Middle East by allowing rebels to cross its borders into Iraq, the latest in a long line of attacks by Israel on the Syrian regime.

“Syria does not prevent the passage of terrorists into Iraq,” Israel’s armed forces chief, General Moshe Yaalon, alleged.

“In practice, Syria supports the terrorists in Iraq by cooperating with the former regime. This policy threatens regional stability,” he added.

Source: aljazeera.net

Peace activist held as ‘danger to Israel’

By Chris McGreal

Jerusalem, Israel, Sept. 7— Tali Fahima served her time in the Israeli army, voted for Ariel Sharon as prime minister, and took it as given that her country was struggling for survival against terrorism.

Then last year, the 29-year-old legal secretary from Tel Aviv picked up a newspaper and read about Zakariya Zubeidi, the Jenin leader of the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, the group responsible for killing hundreds of Israelis in suicide bombings and shootings. Fahima decided she would ask Zubeidi why he killed Jews.

On Sept. 5, the military placed Fahima in detention without trial using a law applied to thousands of Palestinians over the past four years of intifada but rarely to Israelis.

The authorities declined to reveal the precise reasons but the defense minister, Shaul Mofaz, who signed the order, described her as “a clear and present danger to all Israelis.”

Intelligence sources told the Israeli press that Fahima had a hand in bombing an army checkpoint last month, and that she was planning attacks inside Israel.

But Fahima’s lawyers and friends accuse the government of using draconian security laws to silence her because she has broken a taboo against befriending and explaining the enemy.

Fahima started visiting Zubeidi in Jenin a little more than a year ago, despite an Israeli ban on its citizens traveling to Palestinian towns. She said she wanted to find out what motivated him to kill.

“I had to ask why a man goes ahead and does this,” she told Israeli television this year. “There is a reason for this. A man doesn’t wake up one morning and decide, ‘OK, I’m going to carry out an attack.’”

The army describes Zubeidi as one of its most-wanted terrorists. It has tried in vain to kill him five times.

After several meetings with the al-Aqsa brigade’s commander, Fahima described him as a freedom fighter and “a kindhearted person whom I was lucky to meet.” She said she would be a human shield to protect him from Israeli assassination attempts.

“It is hard for a 28-year-old girl who was brought up on certain values to find out one day that they are all wrong,” she told the Jerusalem Post in June. “Who causes the occupation? The Palestinians? No. It is the Israelis and who am I? A Jew and an Israeli and by sitting at home and doing nothing I am also responsible.

“Zubeidi is not a terrorist, rather he is fighting against the occupation. Suicide bombers are also fighting the occupation. Put yourself in their place and see what happens. They are denied basic rights and freedom.”

Those views have infuriated many Israelis who have denounced Fahima as a traitor and terrorist sympathizer. Her religious parents refuse to speak to her, and she was sacked from her job.

Fahima’s lawyers say that if there were evidence she was involved in violence, the authorities would have laid charges, not place her in the limbo of administrative detention.

The justice minister, Yosef Lapid, said the activist has not been charged due to the need to protect intelligence sources.

“There is very, very concrete evidence in the material indicating that she acted in a manner that endangers the security of Israel. Until there is a trial, the relevant officials believe that it would be better from the point of view of the security of Israel that she remain in detention,” he said.

But Fahima’s lawyer, Smadar Ben-Natan, says her client was detained last month after refusing to inform for the Shin Bet.

“[The intelligence services] are attempting to prove to her that she is politically mistaken, they are giving her history lessons, debating with her whether this should be described as occupation, whether Palestinian fighters should be defined as freedom fighters or as terrorists,” she said.

One of Fahima’s friends, Lin Dovrat, a peace activist, said the political motives behind her detention were clear from the authorities’ claim that information against her was too sensitive to be made public in court while the Shin Bet leaked accusations to the press.

“They tried to kill Zubeidi five times and failed and she got to him and was able to talk to him and was able to connect with him on a very basic human level and I think that drives them nuts,” she said.

Ben-Natan says that when Fahima refused to collaborate with the Shin Bet, it sought to discredit her by telling journalists she was sleeping with Zubeidi, who is married. It is an accusation widely given credibility in the Israeli press, and denied by Fahima.

Source: Guardian (UK)

School atrocity may reignite conflict in Russian republics

By Carolynne Wheeler

Prigorodny, Russia, Sept. 10— On the surface it is an unlikely battleground: fields dotted with broken-down buildings, cows and chickens surrounding a sleepy town with faded brick buildings and dusty streets.

But Prigorodny, where neighboring Russian republics fought in 1992, is preparing for another conflict, this time provoked by the school hostage-taking in nearby Beslan. It is the Muslim Ingush here who fear reprisals, and they would be easy targets for the mainly Christian Ossetians, who seem determined on avenging the more than 350 people killed and 700 wounded last week.

Some have already fled; others are digging in, saying that they will fight if needs be.

“[The terrorists] shouldn’t have done that,” said Alekhan Akhilgov, 27, an ethnic Ingush living on the edge of Prigorodny district. “They’ve got lots of people of different nationalities in trouble, including Ingush. Those that are guilty, they should suffer the revenge.”

Zena Doskieva, 50, said: “When we walk out of our houses people stare at us strangely. People say there were Ingush terrorists among them.

“We’ve lived our whole life here. Our children go to school here. The terrorists should run away. They are not Ingush or Ossetian; they are terrorists.”

Angry young Ossetian men loitering on a street corner did not seem to see it that way.

“What would you do if this happened to your child? You would do the same. It’s been the same here for ages,” said Alan, a boxer, who gave his age as 29, though he looked much younger. “The patience of the people is going to run out one day ... I think there will be war, not a large-scale war but war will happen.”

Many families fled across the border to Ingushetia as soon as they heard about the occupation of the school, not even waiting for the end of the siege, expecting the backlash which began at the weekend.

The Russian media reported that as many as 1,000 Ossetians surrounded Prigorodny on the night of Sept. 5, though the attack was thwarted by police blockades.

“The situation is very tense. People are really upset; the whole area is basically in shock and also very scared because the situation is so uncertain,” said Ekaterina Sokirianskaya of the human rights group Memorial in the Ingushetian capital, Nazran.

There are other signs of trouble: many Ingush patients in Ossetian hospitals have transferred themselves to Nazran hospitals.

Kazbek Sultygov, head of the Ingushetian state commission on refugees and displaced persons, said: “They didn’t feel comfortable after what happened. They were afraid that some anti-Ingush movement might start. That’s why people don’t want to provoke anything, and they behave in a very cautious way.”

Ingush students at medical and agricultural colleges in the North Ossetian capital, Vladikavkaz, were asked by the university rector to take indefinite academic leave, and there were buses ready to take them, Memorial said.

“It is very dangerous to stay here. The situation is very dangerous and very flammable,” said Madina, a young English teacher with a three-year-old son, who said she and her husband were making plans to leave the small Ossetian town of Maysky to stay with her parents in Nazran. “People’s moods are very bad. They are very cruel; I don’t know what they will do with us.” Kartsa, on the border, was set upon by about 200 Ossetian men on the night of Sept. 4, although local police stopped the attack.

Bad blood between the Ossetians and the Ingush dates back centuries, but in modern times the tension in the area between Vladikavkaz and the Ingushetian border has been rooted in Stalin’s forced deportation of the Ingush during the second world war, and their return a decade later to homes which had been given over to Ossetians.

During the fighting of 12 years ago, 50,000 or so Ingush fled the district. About 20,000 have returned, and many are now rebuilding their houses with the help of government compensation. But the resentment has been quietly growing, fed by the Ossetians’ fear that Ingush militants were aiding the separatists in Chechnya.

The police have seized caches of weapons in the area in recent months, and ethnic Ingush and Chechen fighters were reported to be among those who attacked Russian government buildings in Nazran in June.

If war begins, it may ignite the Caucasus, Sergei Artuniov, head of the Caucasus department of the Moscow institute of ethnology, said.

Ruslan, 45, an Ossetian driver living in Prigorodny, agreed. “[The Ingush] should have the conscience to understand that Ossetians would never live with them together. If they don’t leave themselves, we will ask them to, as in 1992.”

Source: Guardian (UK)

Housing revolution attempted in Venezuela

By Robin Nieto

Caracas, Venezuela, Sept. 2 — Across the country, the Venezuelan government, via the Ministry of Infrastructure (MINFRA) and other housing institutions, is opening new housing projects, providing homes for the poorest of Venezuelans.

Housing projects to benefit the poor are not new in Venezuela and not restricted to President Hugo Chavez’s government. In the state of Miranda, adjacent to the district of Caracas, opposition Governor Enrique Mendoza also provides homes for Venezuela’s poor. Both leaders have been accused of political grandstanding by using housing projects and social programs as a method to win votes during election periods.

However, unlike Mendoza, Chavez has based his political platform on his Bolivarian Revolution, which is essentially a “new deal” for an estimated 80 percent of Venezuelans who live in poverty. His social revolution is comprised of new social programs in health, education, and housing, fueled by the country’s oil income. Venezuela is the 5th largest exporter of oil in the world.

Tapping into the country’s previously impenetrable oil fund, which was once controlled by a tiny “oiligarchy,” has made Chavez’s social programs possible. Recently, the Chavez government dedicated more than $500 million for what he calls a “revolutionary mission” to deal with the housing crisis in Venezuela. There is a deficit of almost 1,800,000 houses in the country, according to MINFRA, and the ministry in charge of housing has set a goal to build 130,000 houses before the end of the year.

Chavez recently appointed a new housing minister and announced by Dec. 31 the new housing mission will become its own ministry. While details of how the new mission and the new ministry will be organized or why the new ministry is necessary have not been provided, it is clear that the current government system, based on the pre-Chavez era of providing housing through a complex system of numerous semi-independent housing institutions, has been less than effective in many parts of the country.

In Miranda state, on the outskirts of a beachside town called Higuerote, two hours northwest of Caracas, MINFRA, along with housing institute Fundabarrios, teamed up to build a housing community from scratch in a place ironically called Isla Fantasia, or Fantasy Island.

The project started more than a year ago, providing brand new three bedroom bungalow homes for people who lived in dirt floor shacks that were regularly flooded during the rainy season by surrounding creeks and rivers.

A year later there are mixed reactions among residents who are still grateful to Chavez for the houses they have received, but are also asking what happened to the supporting infrastructure and the landfill for their most pressing problem, flooding.

Romulo Salas, president of the residents’ association, says that the government has built homes, but that infrastructure problems persist. “Thirty-four houses have been built during the past year along with four housing foundations,” Salas said. “But our biggest problem is the rain. When it rains, the area is flooded and the resources we need to resolve the problem have not arrived.” While the community struggles to deal with constant flooding with little in the way of resources, Salas said there are 500 children who live in Isla Fantasia. “We hope President Chavez will build a school for us soon,” Salas said. He also explained that the town electricity system has been extended to Isla Fantasia, but that payment methods have yet to be formalized. This means that people are living in a permanent blackout under brand new power lines until that issue is resolved.

43-year-old Zoraida Camacho has piled up landfill in large mounds in front of her shack made of corrugated steel sheets. “We are missing everything here,” Camacho says. “We need sewage lines, potable water, pavement for the street. When it rains here this place is a mud puddle. We can’t keep waiting [for the government] to come, so we do what we can to get by, but we are in a critical condition here,” Camacho said, adding that she is waiting for her own house that she applied for last year. Her shelter stands less than three yards from one of the creeks that floods the area. She has lived this way for the last 12 years.

Along with missing infrastructure, residents agree that the grim reality they face is unemployment. “Here we do not have employment,” says Luis Alvarez, president of a local cooperative that wants to provide services for the neighborhood. “What we have here is survival,” says Alvarez, adding that people in Isla Fantasia are not waiting for the government to provide them with everything but rather they are asking to participate in the development of their neighborhood. “We have skilled workers here who can build the infrastructure we need,” Alvarez says. “So why did the government send in outside private contractors that did a poor job, at least on my house, and who we have never seen again?” Alvarez asked.

Through the local co-op, Alvarez and eleven others presented a community work plan to the national government and to the previous Minister of Infrastructure, Diosdado Cabello, (now running for governor against Enrique Mendoza), which outlined how the community can participate in building the roads, the sewage lines, the potable water system, the houses, and filling in the creeks, to alleviate unemployment in the neighborhood. The co-op submitted the proposal a year ago and to date they have not received a word from the national government. “We do not know why,” Alvarez said.

Calls to both MINFRA and to Fundabarrios at their headquarters in Caracas revealed that both government institutes had no information on the housing development at Isla Fantasia — this despite a large sign at the entrance to the neighborhood that says “Fundabarrios” in large print across a three meter wide sign, as well as the blue MINFRA logo that designates the housing project as their program.

President Chavez said that while government housing institutions have done a good job, they have to “deepen.” He added that housing projects will include integration with supporting infrastructure such as schools, medical clinics, green spaces, and even small industry created by cooperatives. For the residents of Isla Fantasia, Chavez’s vision is exactly what they are missing and exactly what they are calling for.

With upcoming elections for state governors and mayors, the race in Miranda state will be close, since the state was almost equally divided during the presidential referendum last August 15, between those who wanted to end Chavez’s term in office at and those wanted him to continue as president.

Source: Venezuelanalysis

Iran insists on ‘peaceful’ nuclear development

Sept. 12 — Iran rejected on Sept. 12 limitations on its right to develop “peaceful” nuclear technology, amid mounting pressure from UN nuclear watchdog to suspend all uranium enrichment-related activities.

Foreign ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi also said on Sept. 12 that the Islamic republic’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had issued a verdict banning the use of nuclear weapons, reiterating that nobody in Iran was seeking the bomb.

When asked if Iran was offering concessions on building centrifuge components during talks with the European Union, he said: “Nothing official from the Islamic republic has been said or announced in this regard so far.”

“We have more important issues and this is a marginal issue,” Asefi told reporters.

“If the Europeans and the international community want assurances that nuclear technology will be used for peaceful purposes, we are ready to give assurances within the framework of the additional protocol,” he said.

“But if the issue is that we cannot master nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, that is out of the question because we have already reached that point,” he asserted.

It is not clear if Asefi was referring to Iran’s attitude to the resolution due to be considered by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which was due on Sept. 13 to resume its discussions over Iran’s nukes.

Prepared for the Sept. 13 start of a key meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the document suggests a “trigger mechanism,” warning of possible “further steps” — which diplomats defined as shorthand for referral of Iran’s case to the UN Security Council.

The US has claimed that Iran was covertly trying to develop nuclear weapons, however Iran has denied the allegations more than once and asserted that it was merely trying to generate electricity.

“We are ready to give assurances, because from the beginning we said using nuclear weapons is haram (forbidden in Islam). The supreme leader (Khamenei) has issued a fatwa on this. No group in this country is thinking of acquiring nuclear weapons,” Asefi said.

No further details regarding Khamenei’s edict were immediately available.

The US wants Iran referred to the UN Security Council, but Asefi challenged this won’t happen.

“Iran’s dossier will not be sent to the UN Security Council because there is no reason for it,” he said.

France, Britain and Germany have agreed to set a November deadline for Iran to dispel concern that it is secretly developing a nuclear bomb.

The draft of resolution was formally submitted to the board of governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) meeting on Sept. 13.

The resolution urges Iran to halt all uranium enrichment related activities and sets a November deadline for Iran to allay accusations it is secretly developing nuclear weapons.

The draft says the board will “probably” consider whether further steps are needed after receiving IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei’s next report on Iran in November.

The document brings the three European countries closer to the US hard-line regarding Iran’s nuclear program.

Source: aljazeera net

Mercenary Mann sentenced to

seven years in jail over coup plot

By Terry Kirby

Sept. 11— A former Special Air Service (SAS) officer accused of planning a coup in Equatorial Guinea was sentenced to seven years in Zimbabwe Sept. 12 for arms offences.

Simon Mann, 51, who was arrested in March when a team of mercenaries he led landed in the Zimbabwean capital, Harare, admitted two weeks ago that he had illegally tried to buy weapons. The 65 other men on the plane were each sentenced to 12 months for immigration offences; the two pilots were given 16 months.

The sentences came amid fresh claims about the funding of the operation, which allegedly included a contribution from Sir Mark Thatcher. The military operation is said to have been aimed at unseating President Teodoro Obiang Nguema of Equatorial Guinea, Africa’s third-largest oil producer.

Relatives broke down in tears when the jail terms were announced by a magistrate in a makeshift court inside Chikurubi maximum-security prison, where the men have been detained since their arrest. Observers said the sentences were stiffer than expected.

Mishrod Guvamombe, the magistrate, said: “The accused [Simon Mann] was the author of the whole transaction. He was caught while trying to take the firearms out of the country.’’ The magistrate said the offences “were well planned and well executed and that must be reflected in the penalty.”

The court ordered the seizure of Mann’s $3 million Boeing 727 and $180,000 found on board. The men claimed the weapons were intended to provide security at a diamond mine in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Funding for the coup attempt is said to have come from a group of businessmen in South Africa and London who aimed to take over the country and make millions from its oil wealth. All of those named have denied involvement. They have been identified by the so-called Wonga list, information given to the South African authorities by two ex-colleagues of Mann who have agreed to give evidence.

According to reports yesterday, Ely Calil, the secretive London-based Lebanese oil millionaire, contributed $750,000, while Greg Wales and Gary Hersham, also London-based, and David Tremain, a Briton based in South Africa, each contributed about $500,000.

Mann himself is said to have given $500,000 but demanded a $18 million payment for leading the operation, as well as $81,000 to purchase the arms and a contract to provide security for the planned new head of state, said to have been Severo Moto, an exiled opposition politician.

Another figure allegedly involved in funding is Thatcher, son of the former prime minister, who was arrested last month by the South African authorities and charged with taking part in foreign military activity. His lawyer says his client has been accused of providing financing for a helicopter to be used in the coup attempt. Thatcher, who denies the allegation, has been ordered to appear before a magistrate on Sept. 22.

The name “A J H Archer” — the initials of the disgraced peer Lord Archer of Weston-super-Mare — is said to appear on documents which suggest that Mann was paid $133,000 by credit transfer four days before his arrest. Archer, who is said to be close to Calil, has denied all knowledge of any plot.

David Hart, a millionaire businessman who advised Thatcher’s mother during the miners’ strike, was named by Mann in a letter sent from jail, asking for help from his friends. Hart has also denied any involvement.

Nick du Toit, an associate of Mann’s, is among 15 others on trial for their lives in Equatorial Guinea, accused of taking part in the coup plot; he has admitted involvement. The country has also applied for international arrest warrants for Mann, Thatcher and others.

Unless Zimbabwe agrees to Mann being deported, he is likely to serve his sentence in Chikurubi prison, which has been condemned by human rights organizations. Prisoners are confined to shared cells for most of the day, fed a meager diet and live in unsanitary conditions. Mann and his companions have complained about conditions at the prison and claim they have been beaten.

Stephen Jakobi, director of the pressure group Fair Trials Abroad, said: “There is a very real problem in countries where nobody gets a fair trial, because they do not observe international standards, and I am afraid we are dealing with one here.’’ British embassy staff have attended the trial and visited Mann in prison.

Mann, who has six children and a home in Hampshire, has had a colorful career. The son of an England cricket captain and heir to the Watneys brewing fortune, he was educated at Eton and Sandhurst, joined the Scots Guards and then the SAS. After leaving the Army in 1981 he became involved in private security companies specializing in conflict zones in Africa.

Henry Bellingham, the Tory MP, said he had known Mann since their schooldays. Bellingham, who called on the Government to press for his return to the UK, said: “I find it very difficult to believe the allegations. He has always been an adventurer, but a thoroughly professional one. This just isn’t his style.

“Any sentence from a court in Zimbabwe, where the whole legal system has been discredited, is something the British Government must take a close interest in.”

Source: Independent (UK)

US tries to cover up $10 million
given to Venezuelan opposition

By Eva Golinger-Moncada

Sept. 9— According to the Venezuela Solidarity Committee in New York, documents recently obtained from the US Department of State under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by www.venezuelafoia.info demonstrate that during the past two years more than $5 million annually was given by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to various organizations in Venezuela, many of which are aligned with the opposition.

One of the key groups collaborating with USAID is Sumate, the organization that promoted the recall referendum campaign against President Hugo Chavez and which is now rejecting results certified by the most credible international observers and even by the US government.

Sumate, despite its numerous undemocratic positions and actions, has also been a recipient of US government funds from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) in 2003.

However, new documents obtained by Venezuelafoia.info have all been censored by the US government despite the use of the FOIA, which is intended to ensure transparency in US government operations.

The Department of State has withheld the names of the organizations receiving financing from USAID by misapplying a FOIA exemption that is intended to protect “personnel and medical files” of individuals.

Such clear censorship indicates that USAID and the US government clearly have something to hide regarding their collaborations with the Venezuelan opposition. Despite USAID’s ongoing crusade to encourage transparency in foreign governments, the withholding of information that does not fall under any available exemptions clearly demonstrates a double standard applied by the US government in this case.

USAID is financed by the US Congress and controlled by the US Department of State. Founded by President John F. Kennedy in 1961, USAID was established as a fund dedicated to humanitarian intervention around the world. Despite Kennedy’s humane intentions, USAID has more recently been used, in many instances, as a mechanism to promote the interests of the US in strategically important countries around the world.

In the case of Venezuela, USAID maintains a private contractor in Caracas monitoring and facilitating its projects and funds and also has a local operating center, the Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI) that was established in 2002, after the failed coup d’etat against President Chavez. The private contractor, Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI), manages and supervises grants approved by USAID to Venezuelan organizations.

Under a program entitled Venezuela: Initiative to Build Confidence, DAI has awarded 67 grants to Venezuelan organizations in various sectors and areas of interest. These grants equal $2.3 million, just during 2003. In total, DAI ‘s program in Venezuela counts on $10,000,000 in funding for the period August 2002 through August 2004 -­ $5 million annually to “focus on common goals for the future of Venezuela.”

According to the documents obtained under FOIA and DAI’s project description none of the project grants or programs have been in collaboration with the Venezuelan government.

In fact, many of the same recipients of US government funds through the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) have received USAID funding through DAI. Despite the illegal withholding of names on the USAID-DAI grants, one document apparently was skipped, at least in part. The name “Sumate” appears on a grant intended to encourage “electoral participation” in the recall referendum, citing $84,840 as the total grant amount.

Combined with the NED grant of $53,400 given to Sumate in 2003-2004, the organization that is now crying fraud about the recall referendum against President Chavez -- the results of which have been recognized as absolutely credible by the Carter Center and the US Department of State -- has received, at minimum, more than $200,000 in just one year for promoting its attempts to remove Venezuela’s President from office.

Other recipients of USAID funds through DAI which are apparent in the censored documents include the organization Liderazgo y Visión for its project, “Un Sueño para Venezuela”, (“A Dream for Venezuela”) a project created in 2002-2003 with the intent of offering an alternative vision and agenda for those opposing President Chavez’ administration. Liderazgo y Visión has also been a recipient of NED funds over the past few years.

More than six organizations have been given funding for political and social formation and development in Petare, a poor neighborhood in the outskirts of Caracas, in Miranda State. The work in Petare, and the more than $200,000 that have been funneled into that neighborhood in the past year, appear to have been aimed at converting a community that was traditionally pro-Chavez into one that supports the opposition.

The recall referendum results from August 15, 2004 show the opposition gaining substantial numbers in Petare, and Miranda State was one of only two states in the entire nation that gave victory to the opposition in the referendum.

One grant from USAID/DAI focuses on the creation of radio and television commercials during the December 2002-February 2003 strike imposed by the opposition, during which the private media dedicated its airwaves 24/7 to opposition propaganda.

One of the most striking aspects of the media’s dedication to the strike was the use of anti-Chavez commercials to indoctrinate viewers’ opinions on Venezuela’s political situation. The USAID/DAI grant shows funding originating from the US government for some of these anti-Chavez commercials, collaborating with former Fedecamaras President Carlos Fernandez, who was one of the leaders of the strike, in the project.

These new documents from USAID evidence a clear focus on two major projects in Venezuela: The Recall Referendum and the Formation of a National Agenda that would serve as a transitional government post-Chavez (assuming the referendum was won by the opposition).

Source: Vheadline.com