No. 301, Oct. 21 - 27, 2004

SECCIÓN EN ESPAÑOL

ENVIRONMENT



To read an article, click on the headline.

Soy threatens the Amazon, warn activists

The secret dam: 100,000 Chinese, unique tribes at risk

Global study finds one-third of amphibians face extinction

 





Soy threatens the Amazon, warn activists

By Mario Osava

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Oct. 18 (Tierramérica) — Soybean production, which awakens the ire of environmentalists because of the rapid expansion of transgenic varieties, is the target of yet another criticism: increased pressure on Brazil’s Amazon forests.

Although soybean fields do not directly replace forested areas of the Amazon, their expansion in the surrounding areas drive up land prices and push other less profitable farming practices, like ranching, into the forests, explains Roberto Smeraldi, coordinator of the non-governmental organization Friends of the Earth-Brazil.

Furthermore, soy — now Brazil’s leading export — is advancing in parallel to the creation of transportation infrastructure, which also contributes to deforestation by improving access to the vast Amazon Basin.

Each year the Amazon loses some 10,000 square miles of forest. Soybean farming began in Brazil in the 1960s in Brazil’s southern pampas, where the climate is closer to that of China, where soy originated.

Soy production then began expanding northward, and the Brazilian agricultural research agency, EMBRAPA, developed varieties adapted to more tropical climes. EMBRAPA, a network of 40 specialized research centers, has played a key role in the country’s agricultural development over the past three decades.

The environmental groups denounce the expansion of soybean cultivation in the transition area between what is known as the Cerrado — a savannah ecosystem — and the Amazon, where deforestation is taking a serious toll on the climate and biodiversity of the two biomes.

There has been “explosive growth” of soy in some parts of the Amazon, such as the Santarém region, in the western part of the northern state of Pará, says Ane Alencar, a researcher with the Amazonian Environmental Research Institute.

Santarém, surrounded by secondary forests, in some places logged for the past three centuries, is near a soybean exporting port and is a “pocket of drought,” with a topography ideal for industrial farming, she said.

The cultivated area is still relatively small — around 75,000 acres last year — but is expected to see the addition of another 50,000 this year, “advancing on the native forests... and we don’t know what impact soybean monoculture will have on the ecosystem,” Alencar said.

Friends of the Earth has indicated eight other areas of expansion within the Amazon or along its boundaries, mostly in savannah areas, but which also threaten the tropical forest.

Soybean exports have increased the value of land along the highway between Cuiabá, capital of Mato Grosso, and Santarém, which has spurred the illegal appropriation of public forested lands. The forests are cleared to prove possession, and long-time residents have been pushed out.

But Homero Pereira, president of the Agricultural Federation of the central-western state of Mato Grosso, denies that soybean production is causing harm.

And he goes even further, saying those who grow soybeans are “the biggest environmentalists” and put “conservation into practice,” because the crop grows in areas that were previously deforested or were degraded pastures, and improves them by fixing nitrogen in the soil, thus fertilizing the land.

Nearly all soybean farmer practice “direct planting,” without plowing old plants under, a technique developed in Brazil to reduce erosion and retain moisture in the soil. Soy “is not a monoculture” because it is alternated with cotton, maize and rice, said Pereira.

Mato Grosso state, which has Amazon forests in the north, is today Brazil’s leading soybean producer. This year 15 million tons were harvested — 30 percent of the national total. Ten years ago it produced just five million tons.

Since the 1980s, soybean cultivation has also expanded rapidly in the Cerrado, the savannah of low trees that covers a broad swath of central Brazil, and some “islands” of land within the Amazon.

Because of its relatively infertile and acidic soil, it took longer to be converted into a prosperous farming frontier.

Today it is a prized area, because its productive profile has changed as a result of fertilisers. The Cerrado also has the advantage of “well-defined periods of rain” and a geography that facilitates farm mechanization, Paulo Roberto Galerani, an EMBRAPA expert in soy research, told Tierramérica.

The Cerrado ecosystem and favorable climate allow Mato Grosso farmers to harvest “between 6,800 and 7,000 pounds of soybeans per hectare,” a level of productivity surpassing the national average of 2,200 pounds per acre, said Agricultural Federation president Pereira.

The crop currently is planted over twelve million acres, an area that could double “simply by recuperating degraded pastureland,” such that it would be unnecessary to advance into the Amazon, where “soybeans do not prosper” due to the weak soil and excess humidity, he said.

Geraldo Eugenio de França, superintendent of EMBRAPA research and development, says the country could rationally use 150 million acres of degraded areas, effectively doubling Brazil’s cultivated area.

It would be possible to double the production of food, fibers and other agricultural products without destroying the forests of the Amazon, he said.

EMBRAPA is “the arm of sustainable development,” he added, and rejects both “unfettered agri-business and radical environmentalism.”

The secret dam: 100,000 Chinese, unique tribes at risk

By Jasper Becker and Daniel Howden

Beijing, China, Oct. 16 — In the shadow of the Jade Dragon Snow Peak, deep inside the Tiger Leaping Gorge, Chinese developers are operating in secret to push through a massive dam project that will wash away the section of the Yangtze river valley thought to have been the real location for the fictional Shangri-La.

Local tribesmen have revealed that work is already under way on a massive project that would flood a Unesco world heritage site, displace more than 100,000 people and destroy the way of life of the unique Naxi people, one of the world’s only surviving matriarchal societies. It would also bring an abrupt end to the nascent tourism industry in the remote southwestern Yunnan province.

The battle to save the gorge, one of the deepest in the world, has pitted an alliance of green groups and local tribespeople against the Huaneng Group, China’s biggest independent power producer, working with the Yunnan provincial government. The company is run by Li Xiaopeng, son of the hardline former prime minister Li Peng, who oversaw the massacre at Tiananmen Square. Li was at the forefront of the controversial Three Gorges Dam project that was pushed through despite strident opposition from environmentalists and residents.

“The stakes are extremely high. Chinese environmentalists have decided to make this their next major campaign,” says Ma Jun, a consultant who was the first to produce a study on the dam’s implications. “I’m optimistic they will succeed because this case is a touch-stone of all the big talks on balancing environmental preservation with development.”

Opponents say the reservoir will devastate local cultures, robbing people of their farms and livelihood, and leave tens of thousands of mostly Tibetans, Miao, Yi, Bai, Lisu and Naxi minorities homeless. It would also condemn ancient villages with distinctive architectural styles. Concerns are mounting over the fate of the Naxi with their unusual matriarchal tradition, which has drawn an increasing number of visitors to the area.

The formerly nomadic people thought to have originated in Tibet, passes property to the youngest daughters and forces teenage boys to canvas door-to-door for partners in a system of “walk-in marriages.” They are also the last ethnic group to use a form of hieroglyphics, a tradition which is passed down through tribal shaman, known as Dongbas.

Premier Wen Jiabao agreed this year to suspend plans for 13 dams on the Salween river in response to protests from Burma and Thailand and Chinese environmentalists. Construction was supposed to have been delayed while an environmental assessment was undertaken but this was brushed aside by the promise of a power facility capable of generating 30 percent more electricity than the Three Gorges Dam.

Electricity shortages forced factories on the east coast to close down this summer and economic pressure has seen China’s oil imports grow by more than 30 percent this year. China already has more than 50,000 large and medium-sized dams and is running out of waterways to stem.

Nine NGOs, including Green Earth Volunteers and Friends of Nature, have petitioned Wen hoping to persuade him to save an area recognized by Unesco. “We call on the authorities to fulfil the vision of science-based development ... to balance the human interests against nature, in order to leave our precious world heritage like Tiger Leaping Gorge, the first bend of the Yangtze, to the world and to future generations,” the petition said.

Backpackers had long ago discovered the joys of trekking through a gorge which gets its name from the legend of the tiger, said to have leapt across it at the narrowest point where only 100 feet divide the edges.

The province originally hoped to reserve the area around the historic town of Lijiang for tourism, but the state has designs for eight major dams along a 350-mile stretch of the upper Yangtze. Villagers, worried that they would lose their farmland, staged a rally in Lijiang in July to voice their objections. They are being supported by the state forestry bureau, the seismological bureau and the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

The dam is being pushed by the Yunnan government as a way of dealing with the consequences of earlier environmental disasters. Water from the reservoir is to be diverted to dilute the heavily polluted lake which supplies the provincial capital of Kunming.

The industrial center of the province is being strangled by water shortages despite sitting next to one of the largest fresh-water lakes in Asia. Decades of mismanagement have shrunk the lake and the remaining water is too dirty to drink.

Yunnan’s forests have all been chopped down in the past 50 years so not only has Dian Chi lake silted up but so have several reservoirs constructed to solve Kunming’s water shortage. The danger posed by silt to the Three Gorges Dam has already forced Yunnan to dam the upper reaches of the Yangtze specifically designed to trap soil that would otherwise wash into the Three Gorges reservoir.

Source: Independent (UK)

Global study finds one-third of amphibians face extinction

By Steve Connor

Oct. 15 — They were the first animals with backbones to walk on land. They witnessed the rise and fall of the dinosaurs and were present at the birth of a bipedal ape who went on to become the most destructive species the planet has ever known.

Amphibians -- frogs, toads, newts and salamanders -- are among the longest surviving animals on earth, yet something dramatic now threatens that longevity. And mankind is responsible.

A global study revealed Oct. 14 that almost a third of amphibians face extinction -- and pollution is cited as the biggest cause. The three-year survey, involving 500 scientists from more than 60 countries, has found that a third of the 5,743 known species are threatened with being wiped out and at least 427 are so critically endangered that they could disappear tomorrow.

The animals are so sensitive to the man-made environment that scientists have likened them to the canary in a coal mine -- songbirds that fell silent, killed in the presence of odorless gas. The latest and most comprehensive study of amphibians around the world has shown that for many species of frogs and their nearest relatives the singing has suddenly and inexplicably stopped -- and the same bipedal ape is almost certainly responsible.

“This is a problem way outside what we know,” said Dr. Simon Stuart of the World Conservation Union and leader of the study published in the online version of the journal Science.

Stuart said: “This level of decline is ... extraordinary and serious because amphibians represent a very important part of the overall diversity of life. Since most amphibians feel the effects of pollution before many other forms of life, their rapid decline tells us that one of earth’s most critical life support systems is breaking down.”

The figures in the survey are almost certainly underestimates because more than 22 percent of the known amphibian species are too poorly understood for the researchers to reach a reliable conclusion about what is happening to them.

Populations of almost half of the known amphibian species are in decline. While 32 percent of amphibians are threatened with extinction, only 12 percent of birds and 23 percent of mammals are in the same position. The latest study estimates that up to 122 amphibian species have gone extinct since 1980.

Stuart said that all animal groups undergo a natural “background” rate of extinction but, in the case of amphibians, the actual loss of species is equivalent to the total number of background extinctions for many tens of thousands of years being squeezed into a single century.

“The bottom line is that there’s almost no evidence of recovery and no known techniques for saving mysteriously declining species in the wild. It leaves conservation biologists in a quandary,” Stuart said.

Amphibians are considered uniquely sensitive to man-made changes in the environment. Their moist, porous skins are vulnerable to water-borne toxins and infections, and their reliance on two habitats -- freshwater and land -- means they cannot survive properly without both.

Scientists have suggested many possible reasons for the decline. Pollution of both water and the atmosphere, human exploitation for food and medicine and habitat destruction all pose serious threats.

But it is clear that amphibians are also disappearing from what appear to be pristine habitats. At one protected site in Costa Rica, for instance, some 40 per cent of amphibians disappeared over a short period in the late 1980s. Other losses occurred almost simultaneously in Costa Rica, Ecuador and Venezuela.

It is this so-called “enigmatic decline” that poses the biggest problem for conservationists simply because they have little idea about what needs to be done to address the problem.

The authors of the report say: “Enigmatic decline species present the greatest challenge for conservation because there are no known techniques for ensuring their survival in the wild. Most enigmatic declines have been recorded from the Americas south to Ecuador and Brazil, Australia and New Zealand, but they are spreading, for instance to Peru, Chile, Dominica, Spain and Tanzania.”

Many of these mysterious disappearances seem to take place in tropical habitats involving amphibians living in mountain streams. Some studies suggest they may be linked with the global spread of a fungus called chytridiomycosis, which may be exacerbated by global warming. What is most worrying is that the decline in amphibians is occurring across the world.

Bruce Young, a zoologist who took part in the global amphibian assessment, said: “We already knew amphibians were in trouble, but this assessment removes any doubt about the scale of the problem.” Dr. Achim Steiner, director general of the World Conservation Union, said, “The fact that one third of amphibians are in a precipitous decline tells us that we are rapidly moving towards a potentially epidemic number of extinctions.”

Russell Mittermeier, president of Conservation International, said: “Amphibians are one of nature’s best indicators of overall environmental health. Their catastrophic decline serves as a warning that we are in a period of significant environmental degradation.”

Source: Independent (UK)