WINNER OF NINE PROJECT CENSORED AWARDS

No. 305, Nov. 18 - 24, 2004

SECCIÓN EN ESPAÑOL
To read an article, click on the headline.

Fallujah: Civilian casualties mount, aid groups barred

Iraqi resistance fighters stormed into six Iraqi police stations in the northern city of Mosul, Nov. 11, seizing weapons and torching buildings, according to the AFP news agency. Dozens of resistance fighters were seen fanning out on the city streets; some, hunkered behind sandbags, were seen firing mortar rounds on US and Iraqi forces stationed on four of Mosul’s five main bridges.
Photo courtesy Islamonline.net

Haiti: Latortue orders arrest warrant for Aristide

White House orders purge of CIA ‘liberals,’ sources say

Rights groups worried over Attorney Gen. nomination

Help free the Raleigh Three

Talkin' Woodstock nation blues: 'Days of Rage' revisited
Evidence of election fraud continues to surface
The world hangs on this moment
Minority workers a driving force in SF hotel strike
US states defy Bush with carbon trading plan
Legacies of resistance
Press watchdog 'deeply disturbed' by Iraq's media clampdown
Paises andinos chocan con Washington por patentes




Quote of the Week

“Everyone in Fallujah knew it was coming. I had been taking pictures for days. I thought I could go on doing it.

“Destruction was everywhere. I saw people lying dead in the streets, wounded were bleeding and there was no one to come and help them. Even the civilians who stayed in Fallujah were too afraid to go out.

“There was no medicine, water, no electricity nor food for days. “[On Nov. 9] US soldiers began to open fire on the houses [in my neighborhood], so I decided that it was very dangerous to stay in my house. I wasn’t really thinking. Suddenly, I just had to get out. I didn’t think there was any other choice. “I decided to swim [across the Euphrates River] but I changed my mind after seeing US helicopters firing on and killing people who tried to cross the river…. [I]helped bury a man by the river bank, with my own hands.

“I kept walking along the river for two hours and I could still see some US snipers ready to shoot anyone who might swim. I quit the idea of crossing the river and walked for about five hours through orchards.

“It was a terrible experience in which I learned that life is precious. I am happy that I am still alive after being close to death during these past days.”

— Bilal Hussein, an Associated Press (AP) photographer who stayed in Fallujah to document Operation Phantom Fury, as quoted in a Nov. 14 AP story



Click here for an index of original Asheville Global Report political cartoons.

SUPPORT
INDEPENDENT
MEDIA!



AGR is ON THE AIR!

Tune in for news from the frontlines

103.5 FM WPVM

Mondays 8 am
Tuesdays 11 am
Wednesdays 2 pm
Thursdays 4 pm
Fridays 6 pm

107.5 FM FRA

On throughout the week

OR

Download mp3's of the latest news by clicking on the icon below.



No. 305, Nov. 18 - 24, 2004



Fallujah: Civilian casualties mount, aid groups barred

Compiled by Willy Rosencrans

Nov. 17 (AGR) — Local opposition to the war in Iraq has continued to build steam as US forces battle insurgents in Fallujah and Mosul, and international aid groups described Fallujah as a humanitarian “catastrophe.”

Iraq’s most influential Sunni group withdrew from the govermnment last week and urged a boycott of the upcoming January elections. On Nov. 11 US troops raided the homes and offices of two prominent Sunni clerics after both men made fiery public speeches condemning the offensive in Fallujah and voicing their support for insurgents.

Three days later US forces surrounded the village where one of the men, the Secretary-General of the Association of Muslim Scholars (AMS), lives; as of press time no further developments have been reported. The group said three of their most prominent imams (religious figures) have been arrested in two other cities.

On that same day Baghdad’s highest Shia authority, Shaikh Muhammed Mahdi al-Khalissi, also denounced the military assault on Fallujah and called on all Iraqi religious authorities to “support the Iraqi people.”

US military officials said that at least 200 Iraqi troops deserted their posts in the Fallujah attack; other estimates put the number as high as 500, almost a battalion.

“Those who kill Iraqis are not Iraqis,” said the AMS’s Shaikh Mohammed Bashar al Faidhi. “We told them [collaborators]: You made a terrible mistake in Najaf. Be careful not to repeat this experience because the occupier will leave one day, but the people will stay.”

Phantom Fury vs. the Night of Power

On Nov. 11, two days after Washington said its offensive – codenamed Phantom Fury – had destroyed rebel control in Fallujah, forces there

braced for a significant counteroffensive by Iraqi insurgents — an effort coinciding with the “Night of Power,” an annual Islamic holy day marked by intense spiritual devotion, which is said to cleanse sins and determine destiny.

One armored unit was ambushed by militants who struck with rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs). Those involved in the ambush said a trap had been laid, and that the area was marked with earth berms in defensive posture, and metal-box firing positions.

US forces entered central Fallujah but were fiercely attacked by fighters and withdrew from the area after half an hour, heading for their positions in the northern parts of the city.

Backed by tanks and artillery fire, US troops launched a major attack on Nov. 13 against insurgent holdouts; all of Falluja appeared engulfed in thick, black smoke as the attack began.

The US continued to insist it had taken full control of the city on Nov. 15, a week after the attack began, as US warplanes, artillery and mortars attacked areas across Fallujah.

US military spokesmen said that the assault had claimed the lives of 1600 insurgents as of Nov. 17. US artillery continued to pummel Fallujah and troops hunted guerrillas throughout the day; mortar fire and heavy explosive rounds crashed on areas where insurgents were believed still to be holding out.

‘These children are not terrorists’

The city’s main hospital was the first target captured in the operation; two clinics were subsequently bombed. Once the attack began, power was cut off to the city and some residents said the water supply had also been cut.

An estimated 60,000 civilians remain in the city, including “at least 157 families… who need our help,” said Fardous al-Ubaidi, head of the Iraqi Red Crescent Society. At least 2,200 other families fled to neighboring towns, where they are struggling to survive without enough food, water, or medicine, she said.

But the biggest concern is people in and around Falluja itself -– they cannot be reached because of a wide cordon around the city to prevent anyone from entering and any insurgents from fleeing.

Rasoul Ibrahim, a father of three, fled Fallujah on foot, arriving with his wife and children on Nov. 12 in Habbaniya, 12 miles to the west. “There’s no water [in Fallujah],” he said. “People are drinking dirty water. Children are dying. People are eating flour because there’s no food.” Around 10,000 people have taken shelter in Habbaniya.

Al-Ubaidi said her organization had asked permission from the Iraqi government to deliver aid supplies to people in the city but the request was turned down.

“When we asked for permission, we were only allowed to approach the Fallujah outskirts but had no access to Fallujah itself,” she said. She hoped that the military would make an exception to a no-entry rule when the trucks were allowed as far as the Fallujah general hospital, she said on Nov. 13.

Later that day, the town of Amiriyat al-Falluja — hosting about 4,000 families fleeing Fallujah — was struck by a US aerial assault, which killed five people.

On Nov. 14 US troops directed the Red Crescent convoy into the Fallujah hospital on the outskirts of town, away from the reach of local citizens. US Marine Col. Mike Shupp said he had not heard of any Iraqi civilians being trapped inside the city and did not think that was the case.

Lying next to each other in a hospital in Baghdad on Nov. 16 were Ala’a Farhan, 11, and his brother Nafar, seven. The younger child was missing the lower part of his left leg. He lay on a hospital bed still dressed in a jumper and trousers, watching as blood seeped through the dressing on his leg.

The boys’ father, Farhan Khalaf, said his sons had been injured in a strike on the city in the days before the ground assault began. It came just as the family was preparing to flee to the nearby village of Saklawiya, where many other refugees are sheltering.

His cousin, Falah Hassan, was killed and his two children were badly injured; they were recovering in the same hospital.

“We pray that the government will see all this and do something about it,” said Khalaf. “These children are not terrorists, they are not al-Qaida.”

Iraqi police under fire in Mosul

In the wake of the Fallujah offensive insurgent efforts have redoubled elsewhere, in Samarra, Beiji, Baquba, Tikrit, Ramadi, Hawija, and particularly Mosul.

On Nov. 10, in Mosul, gunmen attacked a convoy of civilian four-wheel-drive vehicles of the kind used by foreign security contractors. The convoy went to a nearby police station, where a gunbattle ensued between insurgents who surrounded the building and Iraqi and US forces. Gunmen also attacked at least one other police station, and fighting spread across much of the city.

A curfew was imposed and all bridges were closed, but insurgents defied the curfew, attacking or setting fire to at least seven police stations as well as government buildings by Nov. 12.

Masked gunmen stole bullet-proof jackets and Kalashnikov rifles from police stations and roamed the city center setting fire to police cars and taking control of bridges.

At one stage a group tried to storm an office of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, one of the two major Kurdish parties, and fought gunbattles with Kurdish guards. The US military admitted the Iraqi police were unable to handle the crisis. Soldiers from the US 25th Infantry Division and a team of Iraqi national guardsmen were called in to launch “offensive operations.”

On Nov. 14 gunmen took over banks and government buildings without interference from either US forces or Iraqi government troops. US warplanes had bombed the city 24 hours earlier and the police chief had been sacked after being accused of colluding with rebels. But there were reports of policemen changing into civilian clothes and joining the insurgents. In other districts, vigilantes set up roadblocks and patrolled neighborhoods.

US forces launched a major assault against Mosul on Nov. 16. Around 1,200 US soldiers were involved in an operation to recapture about 12 police stations that had been abandoned by Iraqi officers. Three police stations under the control of insurgents were blown up before the militants fled.

As the US assault on Mosul was underway, resistance intensified in several other towns.

Fighters in Baquba attacked US forces near a police station and later from a mosque. US troops then called in airstrikes; two 500-pound bombs were dropped. The following day rebels kidnapped 31 policemen and launched bomb and rocket attacks on British and Iraqi forces in Kerbala.

On Nov. 17, as many as 60 Iraqi police recruits were abducted as they returned from training in Jordan. If true, the abduction would be the insurgents’ biggest seizure of US forces. US troops were reclaiming police stations in Mosul at the time.

Sources: Agence France-Presse, Aljazeera, Associated Press, BBC, Christian Science Monitor, The Guardian (UK), The Independent (UK), Inter Press Service, Knight-Ridder, The New York Times, The Observer (UK), Reuters



Haiti: Latortue orders arrest warrant for Aristide

Compiled by Jodi Rhoden

Nov. 17 (AGR) -- Haitian Prime Minister Gerard Latortue has ordered that an international arrest warrant be issued against ousted President Jean-Bertrand Aristide.

Latortue, installed as the head of an interim government after a bloody coup where Aristide was abducted by US forces and taken out of the country in February, made the announcement on Nov. 11 as he formed a committee to investigate misappropriation of public funds by the deposed government.

Latortue and other Haitian officials have publicly accused Aristide of corruption, but no charges have been filed and no evidence against the former president made public.

Aristide is in exile in South Africa.

Also on Nov. 11, human rights group Amnesty International condemned what it said were summary executions by police, serious human rights abuses and an alarming number of illegal detentions in Haiti. After an 18-day visit, Amnesty called on the interim government to investigate the police, and urged it and a UN peacekeeping force to carry out a program of disarmament.

Amnesty officials said they feared the return of death squads, which rights groups blamed for thousands of deaths from 1991 to 1994, when Aristide was exiled during his first term as president and Haiti was ruled by a military junta.

On Nov. 14, Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin met with Latortue, President Boniface Alexandre, and leaders of 14 political parties including Aristide’s Lavalas at the National Palace in downtown Port-au-Prince.

Martin said regarding the upcoming elections that “I think it is absolutely necessary that the opposition party Lavalas participate in the election. You cannot have democratic elections if, really, a substantial portion of the population boycotts it.”

A boycott may be inevitable, however, in light of the recent scandals involving the panel organizing the elections next year to replace ousted president Jean-Bertrand Aristide.

The head of the panel, Roselor Julien, has resigned, warning that other panel members were trying to rig the ballot.

Julien said the council was not capable of ensuring the 2005 election would be free and fair. “I resign because I am not ready to condone an electoral farce, nor am I ready to support an imposture,” she said on Nov. 8.

“I promised to my mother to prefer death to shame and to my pastors not to lose my soul at the council,” said Julien, a Catholic, denouncing threats against her life.

On Nov. 12, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) sent a letter to President Bush, urging him to take action to protect Prime Minister Yvon Neptune, Interior Minister Jocelerme Privert and other Lavalas supporters whose lives appear to be in danger in Haiti. Copies of the letter were sent to Secretary of State Colin Powell, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice.

But the administration remains close to the Latortue Government.

As Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld met with Latin American defense chiefs, the US government prepares to share surveillance information with UN peacekeepers in Haiti, an US official said Nov. 16.

Washington announced its aim to “improve the situational awareness’’ of the peacekeepers in Haiti, the official added in a reference to surveillance sharing. “We can certainly provide them more information than they are getting now.’’

In an earlier meeting, Ecuadorean President Lucio Gutiérrez and Defense Minister Nelson Herrera told Rumsfeld they were considering contributing 400 more soldiers to the Haiti force.

Also, a 250-strong Pakistani police unit has arrived in Haiti to join the United Nations Stabilization Mission (MINUSTAH) there as the operation’s military presence increases. The latest contingent, together with 160 Moroccan soldiers who arrived earlier in the week, brings the force’s total to some 4,750.

Sources: Agence Haitienne de Presse, Alterpresse, Boston Haitian Reporter, Haiti Information Project, Haiti Press Network, Haiti Progres, Miami Herald, Reuters



White House orders purge of CIA ‘liberals,’ sources say

Compiled by Shawn Gaynor

Nov. 17 (AGR) — The White House has ordered the new CIA director, Porter J. Goss, to purge the agency of officers believed to have been disloyal to President Bush or of leaking damaging information to the media about the conduct of the Iraq war and the hunt for Osama bin Laden, according to sources who spoke with the Baltimore Sun.

“The agency is being purged on instructions from the White House,” said a former senior CIA official who maintains close ties to both the agency and to the White House. “Goss was given instructions ... to get rid of those soft leakers and liberal Democrats. The CIA is looked on by the White House as a hotbed of liberals and people who have been obstructing the president’s agenda.”

The former officials described morale within the directorate of operations [the CIA’s most powerful division, who oversees foreign operations] as at the lowest point since the late 1970’s, when Stansfield Turner, the Director of Central Intelligence under President Jimmy Carter, imposed changes that forced many officers at the directorate to retire. They expressed concern that an atmosphere of ill will and apprehension could distract the agency from its work in the fight against terrorism.

One of the first casualties appears to be Stephen R. Kappes, the Deputy Director of Operations. The Washington Post reported Nov. 11 that Kappes had tendered his resignation after a confrontation with Goss’ chief of staff, Patrick Murray.

Murray, who worked at the Justice Department and under Goss during his time in Congress, has a reputation for being highly partisan. When senior managers have gone to Goss to complain about Murray’s actions, one CIA officer said, Goss has told them: “Talk to my chief of staff. I don’t do personnel.”

On Nov. 12 the CIA’s number two officer, Deputy Director Central Intelligence John E. McLaughlin, a 32-year veteran of the intelligence division who served as acting CIA director before Goss took over, announced that he was retiring. The spokesman said that the retirement had been planned and was unrelated to the Kappes resignation or to other morale problems inside the CIA.

But according to an anonymous officials sited by the Washington Post, McLaughlin’s resignation came after he warned that Murray was treating senior officials disrespectfully and risked widespread resignations.

Several other senior intelligence service officers are threatening to leave, current and former agency officials said.

“There’s confusion throughout the ranks and an extraordinary loss of morale and incentive,” said one former senior official with knowledge of the events.

Another former CIA official who retains good contacts within the agency said that Goss (a former congressman from Florida, who chaired the House intelligence committee before recently being appointed Director of Central Intelligence), and his top aides (including Murray), who served on his staff when Goss was chairman of the House intelligence committee, believe the agency had relied too much over the years on liaison work with foreign intelligence agencies and had not done enough to develop its own intelligence collection system.

“Goss is not a believer in liaison work,” said this retired official. But, he said, the CIA’s “best intelligence really comes from liaison work.”

Goss had promised during his confirmation hearing to set aside partisan politics and work to strengthen the CIA clandestine service. But current and former officials have said that his plans have been unclear to the senior clandestine service officials who would be responsible for carrying them out.

Whistle blower leaves agency to expose failures

Some of the most damaging leaks that have lead up to the purge came from Michael Scheuer, former head of the CIA’s Bin Laden unit, who wrote a book anonymously called “Imperial Hubris” that criticized what he said was the administration’s lack of resolve in tracking down the al-Qaida chieftain and the reallocation of intelligence and military manpower from the war on terrorism to the war in Iraq.

In a statement, Scheuer said the CIA had not forced him to resign, “but I have concluded that there has not been adequate national debate over the nature of the threat posed by Osama bin Laden and the forces he leads and inspires, and the nature and dimensions of intelligence reform needed to address that threat.”

Current C.I.A. officials are prohibited from talking to reporters without explicit authorization. The former intelligence officials who agreed to discuss the matter in recent days and weeks would do so only on the condition of anonymity, saying that they did not want to inflame the situation further by speaking for the record.

Scheuer was chief of the CIA Counterterrorist Center’s unit which focused on bin Laden from 1996 to 1999 and remained a CIA analyst after that.

His book said the United States was losing the war against terrorism and that sticking to current policies would only make its enemies in the Islamic world grow stronger.

One whistle-blower expert said that Scheuer’s decision to publicly defy the CIA was unprecedented.

“I’ve never seen someone at that level come forward in the way that he has. It just doesn’t happen,” said Kris Kolesnik, executive director of the National Whistleblower Center.

In a letter obtained by the New York Times, Scheuer alleged that the CIA’s Bin Laden unit had acquired detailed information in 1996 about “the careful, professional manner in which Al Qaeda was seeking to acquire nuclear weapons.” Those findings were suppressed within the CIA, and only disseminated after protest forced an internal review.

Scheuer also told panel members that the unit repeatedly was rebuffed in seeking special operations troops to plan moves against Bin Laden, was denied requests for verbatim transcripts of National Security Agency intelligence and was briefly disbanded in spring 1998.

He also told them that CIA officers gave the government “about 10” opportunities to capture or kill Bin Laden and that the main U.S.-based Bin Laden unit had fewer experienced Al Qaeda experts today than it had on Sept. 11, 2001.

And although the CIA has corrected staffing shortages at its Bin Laden unit, it will take several years to train the new agents and make them effective in the hunt for Al Qaeda, Scheuer says.

“What we are doing now is what we should have been doing since Sept. 12. We’re three years behind the curve,” Scheuer said.

Many intelligence officials believe the C.I.A. has been unfairly blamed by the White House and Congress for what now appear to have been exaggerated prewar depictions of Iraq’s arsenals.

Sources: Baltimore Sun, LA Times, Reuters, New York Times, Washington Post

 

Rights groups worried over Attorney Gen. nomination

By Jim Lobe

Washington, DC, Nov. 11 — The nomination by President George W. Bush of White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales to be the next Attorney General has been greeted with caution and concern by major US human and civil-rights groups that called on the Senate to be especially probing in considering his record and convictions.

Human Rights First (HRF), formerly known as the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, said it was “deeply troubled” by the nomination, asserting that, “in his words and actions, Mr. Gonzales has not demonstrated a principled commitment to upholding core constitutional principles and the rule of law.”

The US section of Amnesty International (AIUSA) echoed that view and called further for the full disclosure of any unpublished measures, directives or memoranda authored by Gonzales or his staff bearing on the legality of “disappearances, torture, or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” of detainees in the administration’s “war on terrorism.”

It also called on Gonzales himself to make a “clear and unequivocal statement that, in accordance with US and international law, he opposes torture and ill-treatment under any circumstances, including war and any other public emergency” and to publicly support the creation of a wholly independent commission of inquiry of US detention and interrogation practices in the terror war.

At the same time, the Leadership Conference of Civil Rights (LCCR), which is the largest US civil and human rights coalition, welcomed what it called the “historic” nomination of a Latino citizen to a top cabinet post but called for careful scrutiny of his role in providing legal justification for torture and other practices that have taken place in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the US naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

“In his role as White House Counsel, Mr. Gonzales oversaw the development and implementation of policies related to the war on terror that raise significant human rights concerns,” said LCCR’s executive director, Wade Henderson. “The Attorney General of the United States has the awesome responsibility to respect the rule of law and to ensure that the rights of all persons under the jurisdiction of the United States are protected.”

If confirmed, Gonzales, a close Bush confidante since 1995 when then-Texas Gov. Bush recruited him as his legal counsel, would be the first Latino to serve in a top Cabinet post.

The second child in a poor Hispanic family of ten whose Houston home lacked hot water and a telephone, Gonzales graduated high school with honors, and spent two years at the Air Force Academy before finishing his Bachelor of Arts degree at Rice University and going on to Harvard Law School.

He became the first minority partner at Vinson & Elkins, Texas’s most powerful law firm, before his selection as legal counsel to the up-and-coming Bush who subsequently appointed him secretary of state and then to the state’s Supreme Court where he gained a reputation as a moderate conservative.

As White House Counsel, however, Gonzales has been associated with a number of controversial positions, among them his expansive claims of “executive privilege” in order to withhold documents from Congress and his defense of some of the more far-reaching provisions of the USA Patriot Act. His office has also played a key role in screening Bush’s judicial nominees, a process that, according to critics, has been aimed at ensuring that they share the president’s rightwing views.

Despite his reputation as a relative moderate, Gonzales’ own legal team, as well those of the outgoing Attorney General, John Ashcroft, Vice President Dick Cheney, and Pentagon Chief Donald Rumsfeld, has been dominated by members of the arch-conservative Federalist Society, a group dedicated to opposing the “liberal ideology” it says dominates the US legal profession and the encroachment of international legal norms on US domestic jurisprudence.

A number of memoranda drafted by Federalist Society associates, cleared by Gonzales, and bearing on the detention and treatment of suspects in Bush’s “war on terrorism” now make up the focus of concern by the civil and human rights groups. Gonzales and his associates have argued for three years that the Geneva Conventions do not protect foreign terrorist suspects seized by US forces overseas.

Thus, in January, 2002, a memorandum signed by Gonzales asserted that “the war against terrorism is a new kind of war” that “renders obsolete Geneva’s strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners and renders quaint some of its provisions.”

Similarly, an August, 2002, Justice Department memo cleared by Gonzales asserted that US laws and international treaties banning torture do “not apply to the President’s detention and interrogation of enemy combatants.”

The same memo defined torture as pain “equivalent in intensity to the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impairment of bodily function, or even death.”

These opinions were strongly opposed by the State Department and military lawyers in the Pentagon and subsequently denounced in particularly strong terms by the American Bar Association (ABA), among other groups.

“This no-rules-apply approach helped lay the groundwork for the widespread incidents of torture and abuse we’ve now seen from Iraq to Afghanistan to Guantanamo Bay,” said HRF’s US Law and Security Program Director, Deborah Pearlstein, who noted that Gonzales’s defense of detaining “enemy combatants” in the United States without access to counsel or an opportunity to contest their detention before an independent tribunal was repudiated by an 8-1 ruling by the Supreme Court last June.

“The nomination of Mr. Gonzales sends the wrong message to our country and to the world,” said Pearlstein, who added that the Senate “must ask (him) if he believes the United States is bound to observe the Geneva Conventions …and whether (he) would uphold legal restrictions under US and international law prohibiting all forms of torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.”

William Schulz, AIUSA’s executive director echoed Pearlstein’s appeals, noting that Gonzales’s confirmation hearings should be used as “an opportunity to examine US policy and practice that helped lead to the scandal of Abu Ghraib, seek testimony on unanswered questions regarding the development of those policies from a key participant, and seek assurances that the future attorney general will vigorously enforce the universal prohibition on the use of torture.”

Schulz also said Gonzales should publicly support the establishment of an independent inquiry into the abuses and their origin as has been demanded by AIUSA, HRF, Human Rights Watch, and the American Bar Association (ABA), among others. Until now, the Pentagon and the White House have refused to heed these appeals, insisting that the Defense Department’s own investigations were sufficient.

Gonzales’s reluctance to apply international law goes back to 1997 when, as then-Gov. Bush’s legal counsel, he wrote a memo justifying Texas’ non-compliance with the Vienna Convention which is supposed to ensure that foreign consulates are informed of the arrests of their nationals in the United States and given an opportunity to provide legal representation to the accused.

Gonzales argued that the treaty did not apply to Texas because it was not a signatory of the Convention. Two days later, the state executed a Mexican citizen in spite of Mexico’s protests that the condemned man’s rights under the Vienna Convention had been violated. Mexico’s position was upheld by the World Court earlier this year.

Source: One World