|

Amazon.com reacts swiftly to
union campaign
Seattle, Washington, Nov. 16— Less than
24 hours after Amazon’s Seattle customer service representatives
announced that they had begun a union organizing campaign, Amazon
management has already launched an aggressive anti-union campaign.
One Amazon executive has called an “all-hands
meeting” for Friday to discuss union organizing efforts with
Seattle customer service workers. In addition, managers have
already met to discuss the union recognition campaign, and learn
how to talk to individual workers regarding a union.
These developments come after Amazon told CNN
on Thursday: “It’s not the first time they have tried to organize.
It’s nothing new,” said company spokeswoman Patty Smith. Amazon’s
public nonchalance is at odds with the concern company executives
are communicating to employees about possible unionization.
Even though the right to join a union is protected
under federal law, and is mentioned as a basic human right in
international accords, it has become common practice in the
United States for companies to vigorously oppose any attempts
by workers to form unions and bargain collectively.
Amazon’s top executives are joining the anti-union
campaign. “I would like to invite you to one of the All Hands
meetings scheduled below to discuss union organizing efforts,”
wrote Bill Price, Amazon’s Vice President of Customer Service,
in an e-mail to Seattle workers today. The e-mail also said
that individuals would be paid if they attended the meeting
if they were not scheduled to work that day.
“I want to know why we are getting paid to attend
this one when we were specifically told we would not get paid
for attending past all-hands meetings,” asked Myrtle Griffiths,
a member of the Amazon union organizing committee.
While Amazon calls this an “all-hands meeting,”
unions call them “captive audience” meetings because workers
usually have to sit through long meetings while the company
gives its perspective on unionization, but workers are given
no opportunity to voice pro-union statements. These meetings
can be very effective in stopping organizing drives as companies
use them to intimidate and pressure workers into not supporting
the union. Captive audience meetings are not illegal under federal
labor law. However, labor organizations have argued that they
are a form of intimidation by management seeking to discourage
workers from joining the union.
Besides holding captive audience meetings, Amazon
is training its managers to tell workers that unions will lead
to strikes, picket lines, and possible job loss. “Inform reps
of the disadvantages of joining a union, including the possibility
of strikes, serving on picket line, fines and dues,” wrote company
executive Laurie Arnold in an email to Amazon supervisors on
Thursday.
Arnold’s email is typical of the anti-union rhetoric
companies send to employees when faced with a union organizing
drive. According to the Communications Workers of America (CWA),
the vast majority of union contract negotiations -- about 97
percent -- are settled without a strike. The CWA also notes
that local union decisions, including any decisions on whether
to approve a contract or strike, are made democratically by
the members of that local union, and not by any so-called “union
bosses.”
Source: WashTech
Mexican oil workers take over
state-run gas plant
Villahermosa, Mexico, Nov. 14— About 300
employees of the state-owned Pemex oil company took over a gas
plant in the Mexican Gulf coast state of Tabasco to demand aid
payments they said they had been promised.
The workers blocked entrances and occupied administrative
offices Tuesday at the Ciudad Pemex natural gas plant about
55 kilometers (35 miles) east of Villahermosa, the state capital.
They demanded that the company give them tax rebates promised
by the federal government as part of an aid package for parts
of Tabasco that flooded last year.
The workers said those rebates -- equivalent to
about 15 percent of their wages -- had never been paid. A local
leader of the oil workers’ union said the money may have been
used by the ruling Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI,
to fund political campaigns.
“The rebates were channeled into vote buying and
campaigns,” said union leader Jorge Chavez.
The PRI won the Tabasco state governorship in
October amid charges of fraud, and the PRI has a history of
campaign finance scandals in the state. Local PRI leaders were
not immediately available for comment.
The Ciudad Pemex plant produces natural gas for
domestic use. The rebates were due to as many as 15,000 Pemex
employees in the region, and workers said they might expand
their protests.
“We will pressure as much as we need to,” Chavez
said.
Carlos Morales Gil, assistant regional director
of the Pemex Exploration and Production division, said the protests
had affected the company’s operations but that “it’s all under
control.”
Morales Gil said Pemex has begun talks with the
federal Treasury Secretariat on the dispute.
Source: Associated Press
South Africans march against
privatization
Johannesburg, South Africa, Nov. 19— More
than 60,000 municipal workers around South Africa on November
15-17 staged strikes and marches to oppose the privatization
of local government services being pushed through by mainly
African National Congress-controlled councils.
In Johannesburg, members of South African Municipal
Workers Union (SAMWU) and the Independent Municipal and Allied
Trade Union picketed the city council’s offices on November
16. An estimated 25,000 workers marched through the city the
following day. SAMWU and IMATU members also went on strike and
marched in Pretoria, Durban, and Northern Cape and Northern
provinces.
In Cape Town, rival ANC and Democratic Alliance
councilors suspended campaigning for the December local government
election and united to apply to the Labor Court to ban the strike.
Workers were extremely angry when they heard that
the water multinational with the worst track record in the world,
Suez-Lyonnaise, had announced in Paris on November 16 that it
had won the contract to privatize Johannesburg’s water. SAMWU
said that unless the contract was withdrawn, strike action was
likely.
Source: Green Left Weekly: www.greenleft.org
NYU grad students vote to unionize
By Beth Gardiner
New York, New York, Nov. 16— Students working
as teaching and research assistants at NYU voted 619 to 551
in favor of unionizing, becoming the first at any private US
university to form a union, according to the final tally.
“This victory has been a long time coming and
we are now ready to speak in a united voice to the university,”
Kimberly Johnson of the Graduate Students Organizing Committee
said in a statement. “It’s time to end long hours at low pay
and inadequate health benefits.”
The students had voted in April, but the tally
was held up for months by the National Labor Relations Board
(NLRB) deliberations. The NLRB and the United Auto Workers,
which helped organize the students, also challenged the eligibility
of some voters.
A Nov. 1 labor board decision gave graduate students
at private institutions the right to form unions, overturning
a two-decade-old precedent. Graduate student workers at public
universities are governed by state labor laws and many are already
unionized.
It remained unclear whether the university would
recognized the new union, however.
NYU spokesman John Beckman said the university
could refuse to abide by the decision, be brought to court on
an unfair labor practices charge and then make its case against
the NLRB decision before a judge. He said officials had not
yet decided whether to do that.
Beckman said NYU officials were troubled by the
exclusion of 140 students from the vote.
The dispute that held up release of the election
results centered on 94 votes from students who the UAW said
did not meet eligibility requirements and 201 from students
who voted despite not being eligible.
Source: Associated Press
|